Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Village
Neighborhood
fFamily complex
intermediate
simple
Aim: to acquire a holistic picture and understanding of ethnic life
ways.
Structures:
1.] Simple social organization [family]
-characterized by relatively few and homogenous social units and
less elaborate cultural forms.
2.] intermediate groups –between the two extremes
Ex. neighborhood
- Made of amorphous [not definite] aggregate of persons who may
not be related to each other.
3.] Complex social organization
-Characterized by greater internal heterogeneity of social units and
more elaborate cultural forms.
- Integration is suprafamilial
Basic Features of Simple Structure [Family –
Campsite]
1. Small groups
2. Absence of stratification
3. Absence of specialization
4. No political center
5. Family as focal point of activities
Basic Features of Intermediate Structure
[ Neighborhood – Settlement]
1. Medium groups
2. Emerging stratification
3. Presence of semi- specialization
4. Loose political center
5. Neighborhood as focal point of activities
Basic Features of Complex Structure
[Village – District]
1. Large groups
2. Marked stratification
3. Institutionalized specialization
4. Defined political center
5. Village as focal point of activities
Criteria for Taxonomic Comparison
1. Settlement Patterns – size of territory, village
structure, residence type
2. Social Structure – size of population, social
stratification, kinship and family system
3. Economic criterion – food quest, production,
distribution and consumption
Criteria for Taxonomic Comparison
4. Socio political criterion – allocation of power,
network of influence, administration of
authority, alliance system
5. Religion and Art – idea of cosmos, ceremony,
ritual behavior, prescription of moral values
and the expression of these in art forms
6. Warfare – head taking, feuds and conflicts,
resolution – peace pacts and custom laws.
“Head-taking” is more appropriate than “head-
hunting.” The people do not go around
hunting for heads; only the enemies’ heads
are taken as symbols of success in warfare or
as “testimonies of manhood” in the male rite
of passage from puberty to adolescence.
• Humans have practiced capital punishment by beheading
for millennia. The Narmer Palette (c. 3000 BCE) shows the
first known depiction of decapitated corpses. The terms
"capital offence", "capital crime", "capital punishment",
derive from the Latin caput, "head", referring to the
punishment for serious offences involving the forfeiture of
the head; i.e. death by beheading.
• Some cultures, such as ancient Rome and Greece
regarded decapitation as the most honorable form of
death. Many European nations continued to reserve the
method only for nobles and royalty. In France, the
French Revolution made it the only legal method of
execution for all criminals regardless of class, one of the
period's many symbolic changes
• The British Empire used beheading and display of severed
heads and other body parts on pikes, etc., as a method to
support conquest, territorial expansion, pillage and looting.
Heads were displayed to terrify various peoples into
submission, such as enslaved Africans and Chinese.
• Historically, beheading was typically used for noblemen, while
commoners would be hanged; eventually, hanging was adopted
as the standard means of non-military executions. The last
actual execution by beheading was of Simon Fraser, 11th Lord
Lovat on 9 April 1747, while a number of convicts (typically
traitors sentenced to drawing and quartering, a method which
had already been discontinued) were beheaded posthumously
up to the early 19th century. Beheading was degraded to a
secondary means of execution, including for treason, with the
abolition of drawing and quartering in 1870 and finally
abolished by the Statute Law (Repeals) Act 1973.
https://minorityrights.org/minorities/indigenous
-peoples-6/
Indigenous peoples - Minority Rights Group
10 THINGS WE ALL SHOULD KNOW ABOUT INDIGENOUS PEOPLES
United Nations Development Programme
By UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME AUGUST
9TH, 2017