AN ANALYTICAL STUDY OF

INTERNATIONAL TRADE AND

CLIMATE CHANGE

Name : SHER SINGH YADAV

Roll No. : R450217111
SAP ID : 500062660
Introduction
The principle goal of the examination paper is to investigate
about how really the International Trade is corrupting the
earth and how hurtful a weapon it came become sooner rather
than later.
A second factor is increasingly open trade and investment
approaches. Nations have opened up their trade routines
unilaterally, bilaterally, regionally, and multilaterally. Measures
that saddled, confined or precluded trade have either been
wiped out or decreased fundamentally.
Financial analysts have built up specific ideas about how and
for what reason is the International Trade affecting the
environment at such high rate.
Key Takeaways

International trade opens new markets and exposes

countries to goods and services unavailable in their
domestic economies. 
Countries that export often develop companies that
know how to achieve a competitive advantage in the
world market.
Trade agreements may boost exports and economic
growth, but the competition they bring is often
damaging to small, domestic industries.
 The expansion of world trade may be one reason why trade is increasingly being
raised in climate change discussions and may also help to explain why there are
concerns about the impact of trade on greenhouse gas emissions. But to what extent
are the concerns justified.
 The “scale” effect refers to the impact on greenhouse gas emissions from the
increased output or economic activity resulting from freer trade. 
 The Paris Agreement, leaders from around the world collectively agreed that climate
change is driven by human behavior, that it’s a threat to the environment and all of
humanity, and that global action is needed to stop it. It also created a clear
framework for all countries to make emissions reduction commitments and
strengthen those actions over time.
 The World Trade Organization as a team with the United Nation is making all steps
imaginable to check this issue of climate change with and in influence to trade. Be
that as it may, the created countries and superpowers like USA have now begun to
export the much obsolete and rejected technological gear which even they do utilize
by and large. The substantial apparatuses they are manufacture endless supply of
such materials which are hurtful for the general public and the climate too.
Conclusion and suggestion
Effective environmental policies and institutional
frameworks are needed at the local,regional, national,
and international levels. The impact of trade
liberalisation on a country’s welfare depends on
whether appropriate environmental policies are in
place within the country in question (e.g. correctly
pricing exhaustible environmental resources).
The CTE experience is helping governments and
stakeholders consider the environment and
development impacts of trade more precisely.
Lastly my suggestion is that both industrial and developing countries
—will be needed to realize trade's potential as a driving force for
economic growth and development. Greater efforts by industrial
countries, and the international community more broadly, are called
for to remove the trade barriers facing developing countries,
particularly the poorest countries. Although quotas under the so-
called Multifiber Agreement are due to be phased out by 2005,
speedier liberalization of textiles and clothing and of agriculture is
particularly important. Similarly, the elimination of tariff peaks and
escalation in agriculture and manufacturing also needs to be pursued.
In turn, developing countries would strengthen their own economies
(and their trading partners') if they made a sustained effort to reduce
their own trade barriers further.