METHODS OF SECOND LANGUAGE

ACQUISITION
Lecture 4
Miss. G. Alshubeiki
2017
Applied linguistics/ level 5
Methods of SLA
     Over the past three decades, studies in linguistics
have focused on second language acquisition
investigating how a second language is acquired,
describing different stages of development and
assessing whether second language acquisition follows
a similar route to that of first language acquisition.
More recent approaches designed to promote L2
learning have tended to reflect different theoretical
views on how an L2 might best be learned.
Methods of SLA
There are 3 main methods:
1. Grammar-translation method
2. Audio-lingual method
3. Communicative method
1. Grammar-translation method
 This method is the most traditional one.
 Focus on literature of the foreign language
 Focus on Vocabulary lists and sets of grammar rules for learning
 Focus on memorization
 Focus on written language rather than spoken language.
 This method has its roots in the traditional teaching of Latin and is
described as the grammar–translation method.
 Using this method often leaves students quite ignorant of how the
language
 might be used in everyday conversation.
 Although this method clearly produced many successful L2 users over
the centuries, it is sometimes claimed that students can leave school,
having achieved high grades in French class via this method, yet find
themselves at a loss when confronted by the way the French in France
actually use their language.
1. Grammar-translation method
Learning a foreign language is to be able to read literature written in
it. Literary language is superior to spoken language. If students can
translate from one language into another, they are considered
successful language learners.
The ability to communicate in the target language is not a goal of
foreign language instruction.
The teacher is the authority in the classroom. It is very important that
students get the correct answer.
Learning is facilitated through attention to similarities between the
target language and the native language.
The meaning of the target language is made clear by translating into
the students’ native language. The language that is used in class is
mostly the students’ native language.
2. Audio-lingual method
 It is different from the grammar-translation method
 It emphasizes the spoken language
 This method became popular in the middle of the twentieth century.
 It was strongly influenced by a belief that the fluent use of a language
was essentially a set of “habits” that could be developed with a lot of
practice.
 Much of this practice involved hours spent in a language laboratory
repeating oral drills. And excercises.
 Versions of this approach are still used in language teaching
 It has one weakness that it can be incredibly boring.
3. Communicative method
 This method came as a reaction against the previous two methods:
Grammar-translation method and audio-lingual method.
 Although there are many different versions of how to create
communicative experiences for L2 learners, they are all based on a
belief that the functions of language (what it is used for) should be
emphasized rather than the forms of the language (correct
grammatical or phonological structures).
 Classroom lessons are likely to be organized around concepts such as
“asking for things” in different social settings, rather than “the forms of
the past tense” in different sentences.
 It attempts to provide more appropriate materials for L2 learning that
has a specific purpose, as in “English for medical personnel” or
“Japanese for business people.”
Focus of SLA (second language acquisition)
The most fundamental change in the area of L2
learning in recent years has been a shift from concern
with the teacher, the textbook and the method to an
interest in the learner and the acquisition process. For
example, one radical feature of most communicative
approaches is the toleration of “errors” produced by
students.
How errors are treated in SLA
Traditionally, in the past “errors” were regarded
negatively and had to be avoided.
 Today such errors in learners’ use of the L2 are
accepted. This is due to a fundamental shift in
perspective from the more traditional view of how L2
learning takes place.
Types of SLA errors
When an Arab speaker says “there are three womens” we
can look at this utterance as an indication of the natural
L2 acquisition process instead of saying that his English
is not correct.
An “error,” then, is not something that stops a student’s
progress, but is probably a clue to the active learning
progress being made by the student as he communicate
in the new language. Just as children acquire their L1
produce certain types of ungrammatical forms at times,
so we might expect the L2 learner to produce similar
forms at certain stages
Types of SLA errors
some errors may be due to “transfer”. Transfer means using
sounds, expressions or structures from the L1 when
performing in the L2.
 For example, an Arab(L1) speaker who says “This is a girl pretty”.
This error may happen because the speaker may be trying to
imitate the use of the Arab adjective which comes after the noun.
Therefore, he does the same in English and places the word
“pretty” after the noun, as is typical in Arabic constructions.
It results in negative transfer and it may make the L2 expression
difficult to understand. We should remember that negative
transfer is more common in the early stages of L2 learning and
often decreases as the learner develops familiarity with the L2.
Types of SLA errors
There is a type of “errors” that seem to have no connection to
the forms of either the L1 or L2. For example, the Arab L1
speaker who says in English this sentence: ( She name is
Maria ) is producing a form that is not used by adult
speakers of English, does not occur in English L1 acquisition
by children, and is not based on a structure in Arabic.
Evidence of this sort suggests that there is some in-between
system used in the L2 acquisition process that certainly
contains aspects of the L1 and L2, but which is an inherently
variable system with rules of its own. This system is called an
inter-language and it is now considered to be the basis of all
L2 production.