Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Journal Appraisal
Journal Appraisal
APPRAISE DIRECTNESS
• COMPARE AND CONTRAST HISTO-PATHOLOGY
FINDINGS AND USING PREVENTIVE TOOLS
SUCH AS TOTAL LYMPHOCYTE COUNT AND
NEUTROPHIL COUNT
• CHECK INCLUSION AND EXCLUSION CRITERIA
OF JOURNAL
CLINICAL SCENARIO JOURNAL STUDY
POPULATION NEGATIVE APPENDECTOMY INCIDENCE IS 1.5 TO 1.9
USUALLY SIGNIFICANTLY PER 100.000 AND IS 1.4
SLIGHTLY MALE TO FEMALE TIMES MORE COMMON IN
PREDOMINANCE BUT MEN
HIGHER IN FEMALE
INTERVENTION
OUTCOME
METHOD RETROSPECTIVE STUDY
SAMPLE SELECTION
SAMPLE SELECTION
INCLUSION CRITERIA EXCLUSION CRITERIA
• ALL CASES PRESENTED IN • PATIENTS WITH INTERVAL,
THE EMERGENCY WITH A ELECTIVE OR INCIDENTAL
DIAGNOSIS OF ACUTE APPENDECTOMIES ARE
APPENDICITIS DURING THE EXCLUDED
PERIOD OF STUDY WERE • ALL CASES WITH CO-
INCLUDED. MORBIDITIES SUCH AS
CROHN’S DISEASE, PELVIC
INFLAMMATORY DISEASE,
GASTROENTERITIS, SYSTEMIC
INFECTION, AND PREGNANCY
WERE EXCLUDED
APPRAISE VALIDITY
• Were patient randomly assigned to participate in the
study?
• Was the two preventive tool confirms to be positive in
reducing negative appendectomies?
• Which gender are in risk of emergency
appendectomy?
• What is acute appendicitis in terms of clinical
diagnosis?
• What are the baseline investigations carried out?
• Comparison of True Appendectomy and Negative
Appendectomy
Were patient randomly assigned to participate in the
study?