Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Department of Education
Ph.D Coursework examination 2021
PowerPoint Presentation
as an Assignment/Practicum of coursework for partial fulfillment of Ph.D course
Topic – JEAN PIAGET AND COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT THEORY
Paper- EDNPHD-3 (Computer Application in Research)
Presented by:
Name- Arghya Das
REGN NO.- 0101070011
Roll no- PH.D-07-20010011
Swiss Psychologist, worked for several decades on understanding
children’s cognitive development and Most widely known
Jean Piaget THEORY OF COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT.
Is the usual of continuous interaction between the organism and the
environment .
All three are associated with the formation of schemata and their
modification in order to attain a balanced sense of understanding of the
external world.
Schema or Mental map
Cognitive structure = schema (pl. schemata/schemes).
Schema = your understanding/knowledge of X
A structure that would enable an organism to be aware of and act upon one’s
environment .
A mental framework about something that is created as children interact with their
physical and social environments.
Schemas provide contexts for interpreting new knowledge which Helps children fill
in conceptual gaps and anticipate how new knowledge can be applied.
Schema or Mental map
Critically important building block of conceptual development
For Example: Infants have [schema for grasping +schema for sucking = higher order
schema of action ]
Schema or Mental map
Schemata are constantly being revised and elaborated upon each
time the child encounters new experiences.
Accommodation
The process of accommodation involves altering one's existing schema,
or ideas, as a result of new information or new experiences. New schemas
may also be developed during this process.
Obviously, accommodation influences assimilation, and vice versa. As
reality is assimilated, structures are accommodated.
ADAPTATION = ASSIMILATION + ACCOMMODATION
Equilibration
Process of achieving mental stability when cognitive conflict
occurs.
The process of restoration of harmony between the world and the
individual’s view of the world.
Organization + Adaptation = Equilibrium
Development is triggered by disequilibrium i.e., The human
infant is a self-correcting organism. It doesn’t like being in
disequilibrium.
Development is therefore:
Equilibrium Disequilibrium Equilibrium Disequilibrium
Piaget’s Cognitive Development stages
Experimenting and learning through trial and error. Such exploration might
include shaking a rattle or putting objects in the mouth.
Symbolic thinking
Animism
Understanding transformation
Reversibility
Pre-Operational stage
Classification.
Conservation.
Compensation.
Formal Operational Stage (12-16 years)
Adolescents use symbols related to abstract concepts.
They can think about multiple variables in systematic ways, can formulate
hypotheses
Thought process become quit systematic and reasonably and well integrated.
Reflective thinking
Don’t except the students to be consistent in their ability to see the world
from someone’s else point of view.
Be sensitive to the possibilities that students may have diff meaning for
the same word.
Ask them write paper, then exchange these papers with the opposing side and debate
topical social issues.
Whenever possible teach broad concepts, not just facts, using materials and ideas
relevant to the students lives.
Strengths of Piaget’s theory
Active rather than passive view of the child.
Piaget showed us that infants and children think differently at each stage of development.
Piaget’s sequence of the direction of cognitive development was basically correct, even
though cultural factors may influence the rate of cognitive growth
Criticism to Piaget’s Theory
The children may wanted to please the experimenter therefore changing their
behavior.
Piaget ignored the effect of the social setting upon the child. The way adults use
language and gestures.
He believes development is a universal process but his initial sample sizes were
inadequate, particularly his theory of infant development is based on his three children.
Piaget also probably introduced confounding variables and social desirability into his
observations. May be his children conditioned to respond in a desirable manner.
The sample was also very homogenous, all had a similar genetic heritage and
environment.
Thank You