EVALUATION

PRESENTED BY:
SARITA SHARMA
M.Sc. Nursing
 INTRODUCTION
 The term evaluation is derived
from the word valoir‘ which
means ‘to be worth’.
 DEFINITION
 Evaluation is an act or process
that allows one to make a
judgment about the
desirability or value of a
measure.
 PURPOSE
 Evaluation occupies a important
component in the educational
process.
 Evaluation is essential for sound
educational decision making.
 To attain educational goal.
CONTD…
 It clarify the aim of education.
 It helps in the improvement of
curriculum.
 It helps in the developing a
scientific approach to
educational problems.
CONTD…
 It appraise the teacher
/supervisors competence.
 It serve as a method of
improvement .
 It serve as a guiding principle for
the selection of supervisory
technique.
CONTD…
 To determining the level of
knowledge and understanding.
 To determining the level of
clinical performance at various
stages.
 To become aware of specific
difficulties of individual
students .
 PRINCIPLES
 It serve as self checking devices
for a teacher .
 The value of evidence is gained
through careful appraisal of
teaching learning process.
CONTD…
 It is the continuous process.

 The objectives should be

stated in term of behavior and
content.
CONTD…
 It determine the what extent
the objectives of the course are
being met.
 Identifying and defining the
educational objectives for
maximum benefits.
CONTD…
 Method of evaluation should
be selected on the basis of
purpose.
 Proper use of evaluation
technique require.
 Accuracy of experience should
be made in term of excellence.
SELF EVALUATION
 SELF EVALUATION
 Self-evaluation is defined as
looking at progress, development
and learning to determine what
has improved and what areas still
need improvement. Usually
involves comparing a “before”
situation with a current situation.
Riley guide
 Purposeof Self
Evaluation
 • To encourage continuing
self-evaluation and
1. reflection.

• To encourage individual
2. professional growth.

• To improve morale and

3. motivation.
 • To encourage collegiality
and discussion about
4. practices

• To support employees as
they experiment with
5. approaches
 THEORETICAL MODEL
BEHIND SELF-EVALUATION
 The theoretical model for self-
evaluation is given by (Rolheiser,
1996).

 It indicates that self-evaluation

plays a key role in fostering an
upward cycle of learning.
 BENEFITS OF SELF EVALUATION
 Increased confidence in their
own learning.

 Enthusiasm for collaborative

working, despite initial anxieties
about being observed and
receiving feedback.
 Improved team-work and greater
flexibility in their use of their skills.

 Increased awareness of new

techniques and greater insight into
thinking.

 Enhanced planning skills to ensure

more effective task management.
 TOOLS FOR SELF
EVALUATION
1. Staff annual professional
review procedures
2. Peer support
a. Coaching
b. Joint preparation of
materials
c. Planning, Team building
3.Observation
4. Audit checklist.
 PEER
EVALUATION
 DEFINITION
 Peer review is a process by
which employees of the same
rank, profession, and setting
evaluate one another‘s job
performance against accepted
standards.
 TYPES OF PEER
EVALUATION
 Formative.

 Summative.
 Formative
 Formative reviews are focused
on gaining information for the
purposes of the ongoing
improvement of teaching.
Formative review may be
confined to a specific focus
such as the use of questioning
in a classroom setting.
 Summative
 Summative reviews have a
particular endpoint in mind.
They are mainly focused on the
demonstration of quality in
support of processes such as
promotion or program
evaluation.
 METHODS OF PEER
EVALUATION

1. Direct observation

2. Videotaping

3. Evaluation of course materials

 PROCESS OF PEER
REVIEW

I. Establish a policy requiring

peer reviews

II. Establish criteria for peer

evaluations
III. Procedure for conducting
peer evaluations

a. Faculty chosen to conduct peer

evaluations.
b. A written report, addressing
the criteria, shall be prepared and
signed by the evaluator.
c. The department shall archive
the written evaluations for use
in future evaluations.
d. One copy of the peer
evaluation shall be placed in the
permanent personnel file of the
person being evaluated.
e. All reports of peer evaluations
shall be included in the tenure
file, and are to be carefully
reviewed at the department.