You are on page 1of 15

LEI 3024:LAW OF EVIDENCE

TOPIC 6:PRESUMPTION
LEARNING OUTCOME
1. Evaluate appropriate legal concepts to aid problem
solving.
2. Appraise and evaluate evidence from appropriate legal
sources to make independent, logical arguments.
PRESUMPTION (ANGGAPAN)
Presumption is an inference of a fact drawn from other
known or proved facts.
An idea that is taken to be true on the basis of

probability.
“Kesimpulan terhadap seseorang atau sesuatu,
pandangan, pendapat, atau sangkaan”
PRESUMPTION
In Court of Law – Prosecution must PROVE or
DISPROVE his case.
But if the case is under “Presumption”, the proof is not

required.
Section 4 of Evidence Act sets out what the court may

presume.
EVIDENCE ACT 1950
PRESUMPTION
Two types of presumption:-
1. Presumption of law (Praesumptio Juris)
2. Presumption of fact (Praesumptio Hominis)
PRESUMPTION OF LAW
 Where the law indicates that inference must be made and an individual
has no discretion to exercise any form of discretion to reject such inference
made by the law.
 Presumption of Law is CONCLUSIVE or IRREBUTTABLE.

 Referred to as presumptions where basically it is a substantive law.

 It is stated in Section 4 (3) of the Evidence Act 1950.


EVIDENCE ACT 1950
PENAL CODE
PRESUMPTION OF FACT

 Inference is made upon the accused through the discretion of the


judge.
 It stated in Section 4 (1) and (2) of The Evidence Act 1950.

 Naturally & Logically

 Not required by the law. But it is allowed.

 Presumption of fact is NOT CONCLUSIVE and it is

REBUTTABLE.
 Can rebut the presumption by giving relevant facts.
CONT..
 Example: Where a man with bloodstained clothes comes out of a room where
another man has been stabbed to death. The inference is that the man coming
out of the room is the murderer.
 Example: the law assumes that a person found in possession of recently

stolen goods is either the thief or has received the goods knowing them to be
stolen, unless he can account for his possession.
 The presumption will subsist in the absence of evidence to the contrary.
EVIDENCE ACT 1950
EVIDENCE ACT 1950
DANGEROUS DRUGS ACT 1952
END OF SLIDES.
THANK YOU!

You might also like