You are on page 1of 30

MANAGEMENT

AND COST
ACCOUNTING
SIXTH EDITION

COLIN DRURY

Management and Cost Accounting, 6th edition, ISBN 1-84480-028-8


© 2004 Colin Drury
Part Three:
Information for decision-making

Chapter Fourteen:
Capital investment decisions 2

Management and Cost Accounting, 6th edition, ISBN 1-84480-028-8


© 2000 Colin Drury
© 2004 Colin Drury
14.1a
Capital investments with unequal lives

• Machines A and B are two mutually exclusive machines A ’s life =3 years


and B’s life =2 years

• Can we base the decision on the NPV or IRR ’s of each machine? (Only
if the task for which they are required ceases at the end of the project
lives).

• What if the task for which the machines are required is for many years
(say >6 years)?

We are faced with a replacement chain problem and as long as the


common denominator for the project lives is less than the task life we can
use either the lowest common multiple method or the equivalent annual cash flow
method.

• Lowest common denominator method:


Lowest common multiple =6 years (2 replacements of machine A and 3
of B)

Management and Cost Accounting, 6th edition, ISBN 1-84480-028-8


© 2000 Colin Drury
© 2004 Colin Drury
14.1b

Management and Cost Accounting, 6th edition, ISBN 1-84480-028-8


© 2000 Colin Drury
© 2004 Colin Drury
14.2a

• Equivalent annual cost (cash flow) method:

1.The costs are made comparable by converting the cash flows to an


equivalent annual cost (EAC).

2. EAC = PV of costs /Annuity factor for n years at R%

3. EAC for A = £1 796.8/2.4869 (Based on years 0 –3) or


£3 146.8/4.3553 (Based on years 0 –6)
= £722.5 for both time periods

4 EAC for B =£705.7 (calculated as above)

5. The cash flow stream of A is equivalent in PV terms to an annual


cash outflow of £722.5 (£705.7 for B). Therefore choose B

Management and Cost Accounting, 6th edition, ISBN 1-84480-028-8


© 2000 Colin Drury
© 2004 Colin Drury
14.2b

• Assume the task life < lowest common denominator

Task life = 10 years

Machine X life = 6 years

Machine Y life = 8 years

Lowest common multiple is 24 years

Suggest use a 10 year horizon with each machine being


replaced once and incorporate an estimate of machine
realisable values at the end of year 10.

Management and Cost Accounting, 6th edition, ISBN 1-84480-028-8


© 2000 Colin Drury
© 2004 Colin Drury
14.3a

Single period capital rationing

1. Refers to a situation where investment funds are restricted and it is


not possible to accept all positive NPV projects.

2. Where capital rationing exists, ranking in terms of NPVs will normally


result in an incorrect allocation of scarce capital.

3. The correct approach is to rank by profitability index (PI):


PI = PV
Investment outlay

Management and Cost Accounting, 6th edition, ISBN 1-84480-028-8


© 2000 Colin Drury
© 2004 Colin Drury
14.3b

4. Example
Project NPV PI
I0 PV NPV PI ranking ranking
£ £ £
A 25 000 32 500 7 500 1.30 6 2
B 100 000 108 250 8 250 1.08 5 6
C 50 000 75 750 25 750 1.51 1 1
D 100 000 123 500 23 500 1.23 2 3
E 125 000 133 500 8 500 1.07 4 7
F 25 000 30 000 5 000 1.20 7 4
G 50 000 59 000 9 000 1.18 3 5

Funds available for investment are restricted to £200 000.

5. NPV ranking leads to acceptance of C,D and G (NPV = £58 250).


PI ranking leads to acceptance of C,A,D and F (NPV = £61 750).

Management and Cost Accounting, 6th edition, ISBN 1-84480-028-8


© 2000 Colin Drury
© 2004 Colin Drury
14.4a

Taxation and investment decisions

1. Taxation legislation specifies that net cash inflows of companies are


subject to taxes,and capital allowances (writing down allowances)
are available on capital expenditure.

Example
I0 = £100 000, cash inflows = £50 000 for four years
Estimated sale proceeds = Tax WDV at end of year 4
Capital allowances = 25% on a reducing balance basis
Corporate tax rate = 35%

Management and Cost Accounting, 6th edition, ISBN 1-84480-028-8


© 2000 Colin Drury
© 2004 Colin Drury
14.4b

2.Calculation of capital allowances

Annual
Year WDAs WDV
£

0 0 100 000
1 25 000 (25% × 100 000) 75 000
2 18 750 (25% × 75 000) 56250
3 14 063 (25% × 56 250) 42187
4 10 547 (25% × 42 187) 31 640

Management and Cost Accounting, 6th edition, ISBN 1-84480-028-8


© 2000 Colin Drury
© 2004 Colin Drury
14.4c

3. Calculation of incremental taxes arising from the project:

Year Year Year Year


1 2 3 4
£ £ £ £
Incremental profits 50 000 50 000 50 000 50 000
WDAs 25 000 18 750 14 063 10 547
Taxable profits 25 000 31 250 35 937 39 453
Taxes at 35% 8 750 10 937 12 578 13 809

Management and Cost Accounting, 6th edition, ISBN 1-84480-028-8


© 2000 Colin Drury
© 2004 Colin Drury
14.5

Taxation and investment decisions

4. If the estimated sale proceeds exceeded the WDV (say, £45 000)
there would also be an additional balancing charge of £13 360 (£45
000 – £31 640) to deduct from the WDAs in year 4 (taxable profits
would equal £52 813).

5. If the estimated sale proceeds were less than the WDV (say £25 000)
there would be an additional balancing allowance of £6 640 (£31 640
–£25 000) to add to the WDAs in year 4.

Management and Cost Accounting, 6th edition, ISBN 1-84480-028-8


© 2000 Colin Drury
© 2004 Colin Drury
14.6a
Dealing with inflation

• Inflation affects both future cash flows and interest rates


(i.e.RRR /discount rate)

Impact on Cash Flows

• Assume no inflation and estimated cash flows of £100 at time 1 and you can
buy a basket of goods for £1 at time 0

Therefore your cash flow has the potential of buying 100 baskets at time 0 or
time 1.

• Assume now estimated inflation is 10%

Estimated cash flows at time 1 = £110

The cash flows have increased but your purchasing power is unchanged (You
still have the potential to purchase 100 baskets i.e.£110 /£1.10)

Management and Cost Accounting, 6th edition, ISBN 1-84480-028-8


© 2000 Colin Drury
© 2004 Colin Drury
14.6b

• Cash flows can be expressed in monetary units at the time they are
received (i.e.nominal cash flows = £110 at time 1)

or

they can be expressed in today ’s (time zero) purchasing power (i.e.real


cash flows =£110 /£1.10 = £100)

therefore £110 nominal cash flows is equivalent to £100 in real cash flows.

• Nominal CF ’s = Real CF ’s ×(1 + inflation rate)n


= £100 (1.10)1 =£110

• Real CF ’s = Nominal CF ’s = £110 /1.101=£100


(1 +inflation rate)n

REAL CASH FLOWS ARE WHAT THE CASH FLOWS WOULD BE IN A WORLD
OF NO INFLATION

Management and Cost Accounting, 6th edition, ISBN 1-84480-028-8


© 2000 Colin Drury
© 2004 Colin Drury
14.7
Impact of inflation on interest rates (also discount rates)

• Assume the interest rate is 2% in a world of no inflation therefore you require


£102 for an investment of £100 (provides purchasing power to purchase 102
baskets)
• Now assume the anticipated rate of inflation is 10%. You require a NOMINAL
return of 12.2% to maintain your purchasing power (£112.20 /£1.10 =102
baskets)
• REAL RATE OF INTEREST RATE = WHAT THE INTEREST RATE WOULD BE
IN A WORLD OF NO INFLATION

1 +Nominal rate = (1 +Real rate)× (1 +Est.inflation rate)


= (1 +0.02)× (1 +0.10) = 1.122 =12.2%
1 +Real rate = (1 +Nominal rate)/(1 +Est.inflation rate)
= (1 +0.122)/(1 +0.10)=1.02 =2%

• Approximations may suffice 2%real rate +10% inflation rate =12%approximation


• Note that interest rates and RRR ’s on securities are derived from current
financial market data (.they will already be expressed in nominal terms)

Management and Cost Accounting, 6th edition, ISBN 1-84480-028-8


© 2000 Colin Drury
© 2004 Colin Drury
14.8a

Investment appraisal and inflation

• Two correct approaches:


1. Discount nominal cash flows at a nominal discount rate
2. Discount real cash flows at the real discount ate

Example
A company is appraising a project with an investment outlay of £200,000
with estimated annual cash inflows of £100,000 per annum for years 1, 2
and 3.The cost of capital is 9% and the expected rate of inflation is zero.

NPV =100 /(1.09)+100 /(1.09)2+100 /(1.09)3– 200 = 53.1

NOW ASSUME ANTICIPATED RATE OF INFLATION =10%

Management and Cost Accounting, 6th edition, ISBN 1-84480-028-8


© 2000 Colin Drury
© 2004 Colin Drury
14.8b

1. Discount nominal cash flows at the nominal discount rate

NPV = 100 (1.10) + 100 (1.10)2 + 100 (1.10)3 - 200 = 53.1


(1.09)(1.10) (1.09)2(1.10)2 (1.09)3(1.10)3

Management and Cost Accounting, 6th edition, ISBN 1-84480-028-8


© 2000 Colin Drury
© 2004 Colin Drury
14.8c

2. Discount real cash flows at the real discount rate


NPV =100 /(1.09)+100 /(1.09)2+100 /(1.09)3–200 =53.1

• We have assumed that current price cash flows are equivalent to real cash flows
but this only applies if all company cash flows are subject to the general rate of
inflation.

WHAT IF THE CASH FLOWS ARE SUBJECT TO A SPECIFIC RATE OF


INFLATION OF 8% AND THE GENERAL RATE FOR THE ECONOMY IS 10%?

We must calculate real cash flows as follows:

Year 1 =100 (1.08)/1.10; Year 2 =100 (1.08)2/(1.10)2

In these circumstances it is easier to discount nominal cash flows at a nominal


discount rate.

Management and Cost Accounting, 6th edition, ISBN 1-84480-028-8


© 2000 Colin Drury
© 2004 Colin Drury
14.9a

Calculating risk adjusted discount rates

1. The returns which shareholders require from investing in risky securities


= Risk free rate + Risk premium.

2. The greater the risk, the greater the return required by investors.

3. The market portfolio is used as a benchmark for determining risk/return


relationships.The risk of an investment relative to the market portfolio is
measured by beta:

• An investment with identical risk to the market portfolio will have a beta of 1.

• An investment half as risky as the market portfolio will have a beta of 0.5.

• An investment twice as risky as the market portfolio will have a beta of 2.

Management and Cost Accounting, 6th edition, ISBN 1-84480-028-8


© 2000 Colin Drury
© 2004 Colin Drury
14.9b

4. The return that shareholders require (i.e.the opportunity cost of an investment)


is:
Risk free rate + (Risk premium × Beta) = CAPM formula

5. The past average risk premium of 8% (defined as the return on the market
portfolio less the risk free rate) is normally used. If the risk free rate is 4% then
the following returns will be required:

• Security A (Beta of 1) = 4%+(8%×1) = 12%


• Security B (Beta of 0.5) = 4%+(8%×0.5) = 8%
• Security C (Beta of 2) = 4%+(8%×2) = 20%

6. Note the risk premium = (Return on the market – risk free rate)

Management and Cost Accounting, 6th edition, ISBN 1-84480-028-8


© 2000 Colin Drury
© 2004 Colin Drury
14.10

The capital asset pricing model


Required return on a security = Rf +(Rm –Rf) × Beta

Management and Cost Accounting, 6th edition, ISBN 1-84480-028-8


© 2000 Colin Drury
© 2004 Colin Drury
14.11

Weighted average cost of capital (WACC)


1. The CAPM is used to calculate the cost of equity finance.

2. Most firms use a combination of debt and equity finance and both sources of
finance should be taken into account when calculating the discount rate.

3. Where combinations of debt and equity are used, the WACC is used to discount
project cash flows.

Example
Cost of equity capital = 18%
Cost of debt capital = 10%
Projects financed by 50% debt and 50% equity
WACC = (0.5 × 18%)+(0.5 ×10%) = 14%

4.The WACC represents the firm ’s overall cost of capital based on the average
risk of all the firm ’s projects. If the risk of a project differs from average firm risk
the WACC of the firm will not reflect the correct risk-adjusted discount rate.

Management and Cost Accounting, 6th edition, ISBN 1-84480-028-8


© 2000 Colin Drury
© 2004 Colin Drury
14.12 and 14.13

Standard deviations and probability distributions

Use overhead as transparency

Management and Cost Accounting, 6th edition, ISBN 1-84480-028-8


© 2000 Colin Drury
© 2004 Colin Drury
14.14a

Sensitivity analysis

1. Shows how sensitive NPV is to a change in the assumptions relating


to the variables used to compute it (e.g.pessimistic, most likely or
optimistic estimates).Can also be used to indicate the extent to
which variables may change before NPV becomes negative.

Management and Cost Accounting, 6th edition, ISBN 1-84480-028-8


© 2000 Colin Drury
© 2004 Colin Drury
14.14b

Example
Year Year Year
1 (£) 2 (£) 3 (£)
Cash inflows (10 000 × £30) 300 000 300 000 300 000
VC 200 000 200 000 200 000
Net cash flows 100 000 100 000 100 000

I0 =£200 000, cost of capital =15%, NPV =£28 300

2. Sales volume
• NPV =0 when net cash flows are £87 600 (£200 000 / 2.283)
• Total net cash flows can decline by £12 400 p.a.before NPV becomes negative
• Total sales can fall by £37 200 p.a.(i.e.12.4%)or 1240 units
• Note net cash flows are one-third of sales.

Management and Cost Accounting, 6th edition, ISBN 1-84480-028-8


© 2000 Colin Drury
© 2004 Colin Drury
14.14c

3. Selling price

• Total sales revenue can fall to £287 600 (£300 000 – £12 400)before
NPV becomes negative =£28.76 per unit (i.e.4.1% decline)

4. Variable costs

• Can increase by £12 400 p.a.(£1.24 per unit) = 6.2% decline.

5. Initial outlay

• Can increase by £28 300 (14.15%).

Management and Cost Accounting, 6th edition, ISBN 1-84480-028-8


© 2000 Colin Drury
© 2004 Colin Drury
14.15

Sensitivity analysis (cont.)

6. Cost of capital
• IRR =23%(cost of capital can increase by 53%).

7. Highlights those variables that are most sensitive so that their


estimates can be thoroughly reviewed.

8. Limitations
• Considers variables in isolation.
• Ignores probabilities

Management and Cost Accounting, 6th edition, ISBN 1-84480-028-8


© 2000 Colin Drury
© 2004 Colin Drury
14.16

Classification of risk measurement techniques

1. CAPM approach

• Risk is compared relative to the variability with the market portfolio.

• Risk is divided into two categories:


(i) Specific (diversifiable) risk
(ii) Market (non-diversifiable) risk

• CAPM assumes specific risk can be avoided and it is not rewarded.

• CAPM assumes market rewards only non-diversifiable risk.

Management and Cost Accounting, 6th edition, ISBN 1-84480-028-8


© 2000 Colin Drury
© 2004 Colin Drury
14.16

2. Stand-alone risk measurement approach

• Does not distinguish between specific and non-diversifiable risk.

• Does not provide a basis for determining the rates of return required for
different levels of risk.

3. Corporate portfolio risk measurement approach

• Focuses on incremental total risk arising from a project.

• Recognizes that incremental risk may not be the same as the total risk of
the project.

Management and Cost Accounting, 6th edition, ISBN 1-84480-028-8


© 2000 Colin Drury
© 2004 Colin Drury
14.16

Example

SD of project X = £10 000


SD of existing projects = £60 000
SD of existing projects plus project X = £65 000
Incremental risk of project X = £5 000 (not £10 000)

• Does not distinguish between specific and non-diversifiable risk.

• Difficult practical problems in measuring risk of existing projects

Management and Cost Accounting, 6th edition, ISBN 1-84480-028-8


© 2000 Colin Drury
© 2004 Colin Drury

You might also like