Maramag Elementary School

School Monitoring &

Evaluation Adjustment
2nd Quarter (3rd Grading)

July 2, 2021
 2nd Quarter
(3 rd
Grading)
School Monitoring and
Evaluation Adjustment
ACCESS
Enrollment for S.Y. 2020-2021
(Grade 4-Jupiter)

Boys Girls Total

6 6 12
QUALIT
Y
 Pareto Analysis in Math 4 (3rd
Pareto Analysis for Grading)
Mathematics 4 (2nd 180

Grading) 160

140

250
120

200
100

150 80

100 60

40
50

20
0
a b c d e f g h i j k l
0
a b c d e f g h i j k l
Grades % Difference Commulative
% Grades % Difference Commulative %
 Pareto Analysis in English 4 Pareto Analysis in English 4 (3rd Grading)

(2nd Grading)
200

250
180

160
200

140

150
120

100
100

80

50
60

0 40
a b c d e f g h i j k l
20

Grades % Difference
Commulative % 0
a b c d e f g h i j k l

Grades % Difference Commulative %

 Pareto Analysis in Araling Panlipunan 4 (2nd Grading)
200
180
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
a b c d e f g h i j k l

Grades % Difference Commulative %

Pareto Analysis in Araling Panlipunan 4 (3rd Grading)

180
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
a b c d e f g h i j k l

Grades % Difference Commulative %

 Pareto Analysis in Science 4 (2nd Grading)
200

150

100

50

0
a b c d e f g h i j k l

Grades % Difference Commulative %

Pareto Analysis in Science 4 (3rd Grading)

180
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
a b c d e f g h i j k l

Grades % Difference Commulative %

 Pareto Analysis in EsP4 (2nd Grading)
200

150

100

50

0
a b c d e f g h i j k l

Grades % Difference Commulative %

Pareto Analysis in EsP4 (3rd Grading)

180
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
a b c d e f g h i j k l

Grades % Difference Commulative %

 Pareto Analysis in MAPEH 4 (2nd Grading)
200
150
100
50
0 a b c d e f g h i j k l

Grades % Difference Commulative %

Pareto Analysis in MAPEH 4 (3rd Grading)

180
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
QUIRANTE,PETE EMBELLE,REYSON, ALOTA,JANDI ANIKA, TAZARTE,MEGAN VOLOSO,JOANNE, BOCO,ASLY JAKE, DACAYMAT,DONAVIC, BAQUE,JESALYN, VILLARUBIA,JYANNA BAQUE,CELMAR, GILLO,IAN JAMES, - LONZAGA,ZALDY, JR
ANDREI, BAQUE BIANES TAZARTE KYLE, BAQUE CASPE VOLOSO BOCO GUARINO FIETELYN, BOCO CALZADO FABULA

Grades % Difference Commulative %

 Pareto Analysis in FILIPINO 4 (2nd Grading)
180
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
a b c d e f g h i j k l
Grades % Difference Commulative %

Pareto Analysis in FILIPINO 4 (3rd Grading)

160

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

0
a b c d e f g h i j k l

Grades % Difference Commulative %

 Pareto Analysis in EPP 4 (2nd Grading)
200

150

100

50

0
a b c d e f g h i j k l

Grades % Difference Commulative %

Pareto Analysis in EPP4 (3rd Grading)

250

200

150

100

50

0
a b c d e f g h i j k l

Grades % Difference Commulative %

Characterizatio
Based on the n
pareto analysis presented, the academic performance of the
learners has increased significantly. This is because of active involvement of
parents towards the learning activities of the learners.

Learners have also submitted their performance tasks output which helped
their grades increase.

Utilization of clustering the learners have also helped them understood the
lessons in the modules well.
Strategic
Options
Conduct thorough remedial instructions to the learners on th
priority
Conductfocus.
remediation on reading with the implementation
of Project AKTo and clustering
 Numeracy Result
2nd Grading 3rd Grading
Category Number of Pupils Category Number of Pupils
Highly 0 Highly 4
Numerates Numerates
Moderately 4 Moderately 3
Numerates Numerates
Non- 8 Non- 5
numerates numerates
 PHIL-IRI RESULT
2nd Grading 3rd Grading
Category No. of Pupils Category No. of Pupils
Independent 2 Independent 3
Instructional 8 Instructional 7
Frustration 2 Frustration 2
Non-reader 0 Non-reader 0
TOTAL 12 TOTAL 12
Governance
 Parents’ Involvement
2nd Grading 3rd Grading

Pintakasi HRPTA Pintakasi HRPTA

Meeting Meeting

11 6 10 8
Pintakasi
Meetings
Home Visitation
Teachers’ Activities
Limited Face-to-face
Thank You!