Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Glend Hubbard
Dr. Wasiaturrahma
Departemen Ilmu Ekonomi
Fakultas Ekonomi Dan Bisnis
Universitas Airlangga
The Federal Reserve’s BalanceSheet and the Money
SupplyProcess
The Monetary Base Currency in circulation Paper money and coins held by the
nonbank public. Vault cash Currency held by banks. Currency in circulation = Currency
outstanding – Vault cash. Bank reserves Bank deposits with the Fed plus vault cash.
Reserves = Bank deposits with the Fed + Vault cash. • Reserve deposits are assets for
banks, but they are liabilities for the Fed because banks can request that the Fed repay
the deposits on demand with Federal Reserve Notes. The Federal Reserve’s Balance
Sheet and the Monetary Base
14.2 Learning Objective Derive the equation for the simple deposit multiplier and
understand what it means.
We now turn to the money multiplier to further understand the factors that determine
the money supply. The money multiplier is determined by the actions of three actors in the
economy: the Fed, the nonbank public, and banks. Multiple Deposit Expansion How a
Single Bank Responds to an Increase in Reserves Suppose that the Fed purchases
$100,000 in Treasury bills (or T-bills) from Bank of America, increasing its reserves that
much. Here is how a T-account can reflect these transactions: The Simple Deposit
Multiplier
Next, Bank of America extends a loan to Rosie’s Bakery by creating a checking account
and depositing the $100,000 principal of the loan in it. Both the asset and liability sides of
Bank of America’s balance sheet increase by $100,000: If Rosie’s spends the loan proceeds
by writing a check for $100,000 to buy ovens from Bob’s Bakery Equipment and Bob’s
deposits the check in its account with PNC Bank, Bank of America will have lost $100,000 of
reserves and checkable deposits: The Simple Deposit Multiplier
How the Banking System Responds to an Increase in Reserves After PNC has cleared
the check and collected the funds from Bank of America, PNC’s balance sheet changes as
follows: Suppose that PNC makes a $90,000 loan to Jerome’s Printing who writes a check in
that amount for equipment from Computer Universe who has an account at SunTrust Bank.
The balance sheets change as follows: The Simple Deposit Multiplier
Suppose that SunTrust lends its new excess reserves of $81,000 to Howard’s Barber
Shop to use for remodeling. When Howard’s spends the loan proceeds and a check for
$81,000 clears against it, the changes in SunTrust’s balance sheet will be as follows: If the
proceeds of the loan to Howard’s Barber Shop are deposited in another bank, checkable
deposits in the banking system will rise by another $81,000. To this point, the $100,000
increase in reserves supplied by the Fed has increased the level of checkable deposits by
$100,000 + $90,000 + $81,000 = $271,000. This process is called multiple deposit creation.
Multiple deposit creation Part of the money supply process in which an increase in bank
reserves results in rounds of bank loans and creation of checkable deposits and an increase
in the money supply that is a multiple of the initial increase in reserves. The Simple Deposit
Multiplier
Calculating the Simple Deposit Multiplier Simple deposit multiplier The ratio of the amount of
deposits created by banks to the amount of new reserves. The Simple Deposit Multiplier
The Simple Deposit Multiplier
· 14.3 Learning Objective Explain how the behavior of banks and the nonbank public affect
themoney multiplier.
· The Effect of Increases in Currency Holdings and Increases inExcess Reserves In deriving
the money multiplier, we made two key assumptions: 1. Banks hold no excess reserves. 2. The
nonbank public does not increase its holdings of currency. In order to build a complete account
of the money supply process, we change the simple deposit multiplier in three ways: 1. Rather
than a link between reserves and deposits, we need a link between the monetary base and the
money supply. 2. We need to include the effects on the money supply process of changes in the
nonbank public’s desire to hold currency relative to checkable deposits. 3. We need to include
the effects of changes in banks’ desire to hold excess reserves relative to deposits. Banks, the
Nonbank Public, and the Money Multiplier
· Deriving a Realistic Money Multiplier Banks, the Nonbank Public, and the Money Multiplier
· Currency-to-deposit ratio (C/D) The ratio of currency held by the nonbank public, C, to
checkable deposits, D. Banks, the Nonbank Public, and the Money Multiplier
· A money multiplier of 2 means that every $1 billion increase in the monetary base will result
in a $2 billion increase in the money supply. Banks, the Nonbank Public, and the Money Multiplier
· There are several points to note about the expression above linking the money supply to the
monetary base: 1. The money supply will change in the same direction of a change in either the
monetary base or the money multiplier. 2. An increase in the currency-to-deposit ratio (C/D) causes
the value of the money multiplier and the money supply to decline. 3. An increase in the required
reserve ratio, rrD, causes the value of the money multiplier and the money supply to decline. 4. An
increase in the excess reserves-to-deposit ratio (ER/D) causes the value of the money multiplier
and the money supply to decline. Banks, the Nonbank Public, and the Money Multiplier
14.3 Solved Problem Using the Expression for the Money Multiplier Consider the following
information: Bank reserves = $500 billion Currency = $400 billion a. If banks are holding $80
billion in required reserves, and the required reserve ratio = 0.10, what is the value of
checkable deposits? b. Given this information, what is the value of the money supply (M1)?
What is the value of the monetary base? What is the value of the money multiplier? Banks,
the Nonbank Public, and the Money Multiplier
· 14.3 Solved Problem Solved Problem Using the Expression for the Money Multiplier
Solving the Problem Step 1Review the chapter material. Banks, the Nonbank Public, and
the Money Multiplier
· 14.3 Solved Problem Solved Problem Using the Expression for the Money Multiplier
Solving the Problem Banks, the Nonbank Public, and the Money Multiplier
· Banks, the Nonbank Public, and the Money Multiplier
· The Money Supply, the Money Multiplier, and the Monetary Base During the 2007–2009
Financial Crisis Movements in the Monetary Base, M1, and the Money Multiplier, 1990–2010 Figure
14.2 Panel (a) shows that beginning in the fall of 2008, the size of the monetary base soared. M1
also increased, but not nearly as much. As panel (b) shows, the value of the money multiplier
declined sharply during the same period.• Banks, the Nonbank Public, and the Money Multiplier
· Why did the monetary base increase so much more than M1? Figure 14.3 helps to solve the
mystery. Figure 14.3 Movements in (C/D) and (ER/D) The currency-to-deposit ratio (C/D) had been
gradually trending upward since 1990, but it fell during the financial crisis of 2007–2009. At the
same time, the excess reserves-to–deposits ratio (ER/D) soared, increasing from almost zero in
September 2008—because banks were holding very few excess reserves—to about 1.3 in the fall
of 2009. Banks began to hold more excess reserves than they had checkable deposits.• Banks, the
Nonbank Public, and the Money Multiplier
· Making the Connection Did the Fed’s Worry over Excess Reserves Cause
theRecession of 1937–1938? Following the end of the bank panics in early 1933, excess
reserves in the banking system soared. Many banks had suffered heavy losses and had a
strong desire to remain liquid. Nominal interest rates had also fallen to very low levels,
which reduced the opportunity cost of holding reserves at the Fed. By late 1935,
unemployment remained high and inflation low. Nevertheless, the Fed’s Board of
Governors worried about a rapid increase in stock prices and some feared an increase in
the inflation rate. The Board of Governors decided to reduce excess reserves by raising
the required reserve ratio. But the Fed’s policy ignored the reasons banks during this
period were holding excess reserves. As bank loans contracted, so did the money supply.
The economy fell into recession again in 1937. Banks, the Nonbank Public, and the Money
Multiplier
· Making the Connection Did the Fed’s Worry over Excess Reserves Cause
theRecession of 1937–1938? The Fed reversed course in April 1938 by cutting the
required reserve ratio. But the damage had been done. Most economists believe that the
Fed’s actions in raising the required reserve ratio contributed significantly to the recession.
Banks, the Nonbank Public, and the Money Multiplier
· In 2010, banks’ enormous holdings of excess reserves left investors, policymakers,
and economists concerned about the implications for future inflation. If banks were to
suddenly begin lending the nearly $1 trillion in excess reserves they held in November
2010, the result would be an explosion in the money supply and, potentially, a rapid
increase in inflation. Fear of this potential for a much higher rate of inflation in the future
drove some investors in 2010 to buy gold. Banks, the Nonbank Public, and the Money
Multiplier
· Making the Connection Worried About Inflation? How Good Is Gold? In 2010, many
investors bought gold because they were worried about the possibility that increases in
reserves and the money supply might lead to much higher rates of inflation in the future.
But how good an investment is gold? Gold clearly has some drawbacks as an investment:
Gold pays no interest or dividend; it has to be stored and safeguarded. Because gold
pays no interest, it is difficult to determine its fundamental value as an investment. Gold’s
value as an investment depends on how likely its price is to increase in the future because
its rate of return is entirely in the form of capital gains. Many individual investors believe
that gold is a good hedge against inflation because the price of gold can be relied on to
rise if the general price level rises. But is this view correct? The record of the past 30
years was not encouraging. Banks, the Nonbank Public, and the Money Multiplier
Making the Connection Worried About Inflation? How Good Is Gold? The real price of gold,
calculated by dividing the nominal price of gold by the consumer price index, shows that even
after the strong nominal price increases of 2009 and 2010, the real price of gold was still 30%
below its September 1980 level. In other words, in the long run, gold has proven a poor hedge
against inflation. Banks, the Nonbank Public, and the Money Multiplier
· Answering the Key Question At the beginning of this chapter, we asked the question: “Why
did bank reserves increase rapidly during and after the financial crisis of 2007–2009, and should
the increase be a concern to policymakers?” As we have seen in this chapter, the rapid increase
in bank reserves that began in the fall of 2008 was a result of the Fed purchasing assets.
Whenever the Fed purchases an asset, the monetary base increases. Both components of the
base increased in 2008, but the increase in reserves was particularly large. Banks were content
to hold large balances of excess reserves because the Fed was paying interest on them and
because of the increased risk in alternative uses of the funds. Inflation remained very low
through mid-2010, but some policymakers were concerned that, ultimately, if banks began to
lend out their holdings of excess reserves, a future increase in the inflation rate was possible.
· AN INSIDE LOOK AT POLICY Fed’s Balance Sheet Needs Balancing Act
WASHINGTON POST, Federal Reserve Hopes Clear Exit Strategy Will Boost Market
Confidence Key Points in the Article • After two years of taking aggressive steps to
stimulate a weak economy, the Federal Reserve had to decide how to phase out its
initiatives in order to reduce the risk of inflation. • Reducing the growth of the money
supply and raising interest rates threatened to slow an economy that suffered from high
unemployment. • Analysts believe that changing the interest rate on reserves will become
a more important tool to control the growth of the money supply. • The Fed had to decide
what to do with its holdings of $1 trillion of mortgage-backed securities. Selling the
securities would pull money out of the economy at the risk of driving up interest rates. •
The key to chairman Ben Bernanke’s strategy is to win the confidence of market
participants in the Fed’s ability to drain cash from the financial system.
Thank You