You are on page 1of 32

CO2 H2S N2

Disadvantages
In the past

 Expensive production cost


 Complex operation
 Short membrane life
APPLICATIONS OF THE
MEMBRANE TECHNOLOGY IN

GAS SEPARATION

Assoc. Prof. Dr. Nguyen Huu Hieu


Nguyen Hoang Bao Tran Tran Ngoc Phung
Nguyen Thanh Phuc Thinh Luu Quan Sam
Le Khai Vinh Hoang Huu Quoc
CONTENT

Abstract
Introduction
Membrane materials for Gas separation
Challenges of Mixed Matrix Membrane
Some Applications
Conclusion
INTRODUCTION

Natural
Gas
Current Gas purification
Membrane
Technologies
separation
• Absorption • Simple modular installation
• Adsorption • Small carbon footprint
• Cryogenic • Low weight
• Easier to maintain
• Low labor intensity
Polymeric membranes

Robeson upper bound limit for CO2/CH4 separation by many polymeric membranes
Inorganic membranes vs polymeric membrane

• Higher permeability
• Higher selectivity
Incorporation of dispersed solids

Zeolite Carbon molecular sieves


Polymeric membranes
The mechanism is based on the property
of material and structural
morphology of the materials.
• Size-selective: bases on size of
components, favor small molecules to pass
through.

• Sorptionselective: bases on
consensability and prefers larger
components
Polymeric membranes

Transport mechanism for gases through porous and dense membranes


Advantages
 Presented reproducibility for large scale
production

 Low cost of fabrication compared to


inorganic membrane

 High permeability and high selectivity

 Endure mechanical in harsh operation

 High surface area and Economically


viable
Advantages Disadvantages
 Presented reproducibility for large scale • Plasticization: Huge number of hypothetical
production gaps and free volume available within the
 Low cost of fabrication compared to membrane matrix
inorganic membrane • Aging: the performance of membrane
 High permeability and high selectivity deteriorates with time
 Endure mechanical in harsh operation • Robeson’s upper bound limit

 High surface area and Economically


viable
Inorganic membranes
Inorganic membranes

Carbon molecular sieve (CMS)


Inorganic membranes

Zeolite ultra selective membrane


Disadvantages
 Difficult to fabricate
 Extremely expensive
 Require advanced technology and

knowledge in handling the issues of


brittleness of inorganic membrane & producing
defect free membrane

 Restricted in industrial application


Mixed-matrix Membrane

Homogeneously interpenetrating polymeric


and inorganic particle matrices.

 Higher Selectivity
 Higher Permeability
 Small loss in membrane flexibility

B. Inorganic particles
A. Polymer phase
Mixed-matrix Membrane

Glassy Polymer
Mixed-matrix Membrane

Optical images of PIM-1 and PIM1/K2B12H12 MMMs


Mixed-matrix Membrane
Mixed-matrix Membrane
Mixed-matrix Membrane
Mixed-matrix Membrane
Challenges of MMM

 Improper dispersibility of inorganic


particles

 Compatibility between 2 phases


 Suitable particle size of inorganic fillers

 Proper interfacial contact


 Restricted in industrial application .
PRISM membrane

Typical membrane PRISM membrane for biogas enhancement


PRISM membrane
Advantages

• High selectivity to impurities


• Various options for size and selectivity.
• Removes water vapor

• Simple to operate
• Great value
Conclusion

• Comprehensive reviews on polymeric,

inorganic, and mixed matrix


membranes & their development process
• Great potential of Mixed-matrix

membrane & its challenges


Suggestions

• Coupling of inorganic filler and polymer to


enhance membrane’s quality and reduce

flaws
• Further research and effort on MMM
development should be studied
THANK YOU

You might also like