Yes K No K

• Wakeman (merchants are experts, can define ONLY THROUGH QUANTUM MERUIT
indefiniteness) • Mack I (maybe QM, but you received it, so no
recovery)
• Moran (mutuality of obligation can be implied AND
interpret in best light of non-writing party)
Yes • Lady Duff (exclusivity K = obligation/consideration)
Damages
• US Rubber (same as Moran)

• Cohen v. Woolen (min requirement = consideration)

• Rubber trading (mutual breach = no damages) • McCreery (agreement to agree = no K)

• Mack II (dissolution of partnership = no duty)

• Bluemner (performance, but value too indefinite)

No • Varney (cannot imply intent when too vague)

Damages • Schlegal (requirement w/o min = too indef = no K)

• St Regis (agreement to agree = no K)

• Sun Printing (agreement to agree = no K)