Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Dev Poster FASEB
Dev Poster FASEB
1
Florida International University , Miami, FL 33199
BACKGROUND RESULTS CONCLUSIONS
ABSTRACT#
Objectives: Effect of family support and education level on Type 2 diabetes, constituting approximately 95% of the cases of diabetes, has Table 1: Reduced Model Predictors of Glycemic Control Family Support was associated with better DSM skills . Patients with
diabetes self management in Cuban Americans (CA) with type 2 been established as a major health threat in developing and developed better family and friends support felt they were better equipped to
diabetes was studied (n=183) (Females=110, Males=72) with nations. handle the disease and had better DSM skills.
type 2 diabetes (T2D). Type 2 diabetes has increased among the general population (NIDDK, 2008)
Methods: Participants were recruited from a randomized and disproportionately among minorities (particularly African Americans and Education was also an important factor predicting DSM. Better education
mailing list in two counties of South Florida. Participants were Regression Models Model 1 Model 2
Hispanics) (NDSS, 2005). translates to better understanding of the disease state and concepts
screened by trained interviewers for heritage and diabetes Outcomes DSM HbA1c about health and Diabetes management. We believe that this translates
status and signed an informed consent form. Statistical analyses Understanding the role social support plays with self-care behavior is vital to Predictors: to better DSM skills as has been shown by our study.
used SPSS. the development of medical standards of care practices. Family Support t=-2.01, p=0.046
Results: DSM was regressed with family support score and Cuban Americans had the highest proportion of diabetes as the underlying
educational levels. Family support (standardized β=.153, cause of death (44%) as compared to Puerto Ricans (39%) and Mexican Education Level
p=0.052) and educational levels (standardized β=.265, p=0.000) t= -2.13, p=0.036
Americans (37%) (CDC, 2008);
were significant in the model and explained 9.6% of the variation LIMITATIONS
in DSM scores (Adjusted =9.6)
Conclusions: The better the family support and higher the The sample cannot be assumed to represent all Cuban Americans in
education level of the patient, the better the diabetes South Florida with type 2 diabetes.
management skills and hence outcomes. Overall model F= 10.2. p<.001 F=7.4, p=.001
Supported by a grant from NIH/SCORE Parameters: R2 = 0.16 R2 = .078
IMPLICATIONS
Promulgation of federal standards of care in managing type 2
r2
DM by involving families in welfare programs.
Table 2: Multiple Linear Regression predictors of Composite Local agencies involved in type 2 DM care should be advised
DSM Score (Best Model) to educate the families of the patients to provide care and support
to the patients in managing type 2 DM.