Some of the important legislations (Acts, Regulations and Notification) for environment protection are as follows: • Constitutional provisions - https://www.advocatekhoj.com/library/bareacts/constitutionofindia/index.php?Title=Constitution %20of%20India,%201949 • Law of Torts • The Environment Protection Act, 1986 - https://www.advocatekhoj.com/library/bareacts/environmentprotection/index.php?Title=Environ ment%20(Protection)%20Act,%201986 • The National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 - • The Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 - https://indiacode.nic.in/handle/123456789/1389?view_type=browse&sam_handle=123456789/1 362 • The Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 - https://www.advocatekhoj.com/library/bareacts/waterprevention/index.php?Title=Water%20(Pre vention%20and%20Control%20of%20Pollution)%20Act,%201974 • The Hazardous Waste Management Regulations - https://vikaspedia.in/energy/environment/waste-management/hazardous-waste/environment-mi nistry-notifies-hazardous-waste-management-rules-2016 Some famous case laws of M C Mehta: • Below is the list of the cases with their case no filed in Supreme Court of India by M.C. Mehta that created an impact not just in India but in many other countries. It led to closure of several pollutant industries and saved the lives of not just many human beings but also animals and plants. • Protecting the Cultural Heritage The Taj Mahal Case M.C. Mehta v. Union of India and Others Writ Petition (Civil) No.13381 of 1984 Taj Mahal, one of the wonders of the world and the pride of India was facing serious threat from pollution caused by Mathura Refinery, iron foundries, glass and other chemical industries. As a result of very high toxic emissions from these industries, the Taj Mahal and 255 other historic monuments within the Taj trapezium were facing serious threat because of acid rain. The Petition was filed in the year 1984. The Supreme Court of India delivered a historic Judgement in December 1996. The apex Court gave various directions including banning the use of coal and coke and directing the industries to switch over to Compressed Natural Gas (CNG). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ab3PxinnE-U#action=share – The Man who saved Taj Mahal Some famous case laws of M C Mehta: • Making industries Accountable • Oleum Gas Leak Case M.C. Mehta v. Union of India and Others Writ Petition (Civil) No. 12739 of 1985 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ab3PxinnE-U&feature=youtu.be This is a landmark judgment in which the principle of Absolute Liability was laid down. The fertilizer plant was situated very close to human habitation and the court held that the carrying on of a hazardous industry in such proximity to population could not be permitted and the factory was relocated. The deep pocket principle was also laid down in the instant case. This judgment also ushered in a period of dramatic legislative progress in India. The Parliament added an entirely new chapter to the 1948 Factory Act, incorporating sections almost verbatim from the Judgment. The Public Liability Insurance Act was passed and the policy for the abatement of Pollution Control was established. Moreover, the Environment Protection Act was passed and the Policy for the Abatement of Pollution Control was established. Some famous case laws of M C Mehta: • Conservation of water from polluting sources • G anga Pollution Case M.C. Mehta v. Union of India and Others Writ Petition (Civil) No. 3727 of 1985 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u595vECX1WI#action=share • Three landmark judgments and a number of Orders against polluting industries numbering more than fifty thousand in the Ganga basin passed from time to time. A substantial success has been achieved by way of creating awareness and controlling pollution in the river Ganges. In this case, apart from industries, more than 250 towns and cities have been ordered to put sewage treatment plants. • Six hundred tanneries operating in highly congested residential area of Kolkata have been shifted out of the City and relocated in a planned Leather Complex in the State of West Bengal. A large number of industries were closed down by the Court and were allowed to reopen only after these industries set up effluent treatment plants and controlled pollution. As a result of these directions millions of people have been saved from the effects of air and water pollution in Ganga basin covering 8 states in India. Some famous case laws of M C Mehta: Protecting the Beas River M.C. Mehta v. Kamal Nath and Others Writ Petition (Civil) No. 182 of 1996 • In the State of Himachal Pradesh, Span motel, owned by the family members of Shri Kamal Nath, Minister for Environment and Forests, Govt. of India diverted the Course of river Beas to beautify the motel and also encroached upon some forest land. The apex court ordered the management of the Span motel to hand over forest land to the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh and remove all sorts of encroachments. • The Court delivered a land mark judgment and established principle of exemplary damages for the first time in India. The Court said that polluter must pay to reverse the damage caused by his act and imposed a fine of Rs Ten Lakhs (Rs 10,00,000/-) on the Span motel as exemplary damages. The Supreme Court of India recognized Polluter Pays Principle and Public Trust Doctrine. Some famous case laws of M C Mehta: • COASTAL AREAS CASE:
Despite Coastal Zone Regulation Notification of February 1991, none of the
coastal states had formulated coastal zone management plan, with the result that haphazard construction and industrial activity was being permitted anywhere in the coast leading to large scale damage to coastal ecology and loss of livelihood to lakhs of fishermen and other indigenous communities dependent on marine resources. A writ petition was filed on behalf of Indian Council for Enviro- Legal Action (ICELA) and the Supreme Court delivered a landmark Judgement banning industrial/ construction activity within 500 mtrs of the High Tide Line and set a time limit for the coastal states to formulate coastal management plans. Some famous case laws of M C Mehta: GROUND WATER DEPLETION CASE: Unsystematic and unscientific tapping of groundwater all over the country had led to alarming fall in the levels of groundwater and data provided by Ground Water Board showed a near crisis situation developing in many areas of the country. Further, the contamination of ground water due to indiscriminate discharge of toxic effluents on the ground and surface water bodies was going on in an unchecked and uncontrolled manner and pollution control Boards were not in a position to either assess the extent of ground water contamination or identify the sources of contamination. The ground water board had no teeth or legal authority to take action against offending parties. This matter was taken up in the Supreme Court and vide an historic Judgement, Ground Water Board had been made into an AUTHORITY invested with legal powers under the Environment Protection Act 1986 to issue licenses and take action against polluters even to the extent of closing down of offending industries. Rule of Strict Liability and Absolute Liability • Rule of Strict and absolute liability.pdf
Reforming Mining Law: A Look at Transnational Corporations’ Activities in the Democratic Republic of Congo Within the Doctrine of Corporate Social Responsibility