Professional Documents
Culture Documents
• Most project managers would agree that cost overruns are the
causes of more frustration than almost any other factor.
• Unfortunately, industry data suggest that overruns are the norm, rather than
the exception. The most significant reasons for this are
• Low initial cost estimates
• Unanticipated technical difficulties
• Lack of or poor scope definition
• Specification changes
• External factors
Cont …
• External factors such as inflation, interest rates,
environmental issues, and currency exchange rate fluctuations
can also escalate actual project costs, particularly in the case
of projects where technical problems and other difficulties
lead to an increase in project duration. In the case of
multinational public sector projects, delays due to politics
among the nations involved can result in significant increases
in actual project costs incurred.
Project based cost classification
Cont …
Cost Estimation Process
• Both initial and detailed cost estimates should be prepared with
diligence.
• Even though insufficient information is available when initial
estimates are prepared, it is imperative that these estimates are
developed carefully, for several reasons. First, they serve as the
basis for future release of funds to the project. Second, they
become standards against which future estimates are compared.
Third, they are used to determine likely overall project costs and
return on investment.
Cont …
• Many project planning software packages can generate a time-
phased cost schedule from the cost structure, project plan, and
work breakdown structure (WBS). This cost schedule can be used
as a task budget against which actual cost performance can be
measured. From the perspective of project control, the most
important advantage of computerized systems is their ability to
generate a cost plan that is linked to the project work plan.
Cont …
Example
2.2.Cost estimation Method and Tools
• Parametric Estimating Method
• The parametric method produces a high-level estimate using
various factors (parameters) developed from past projects,
historical databases, engineering practices, and technologies,
such as:
• cost per lane-kilometre of roadway
• cost per interchange
• cost per square metre of a bridge structure
• cost per intersection.
Cont…
• These methods involve techniques that use historical data to
define the cost using measurements that are easily determined,
such as cost per lane mile, cost per interchange, cost per
square foot, and cost per intersection. Two techniques are
commonly used in parametric estimating: (1) analogous
(similar) projects and (2) historical percentages.
Earned Value Management
Schedule Performance Index (SPI) Between 0.9 and 0.8 or Between 1.1 Less Than 0.8 or Greater than 1.2
and 1.2
Cost Performance Index (CPI) Between 0.9 and 0.8 or Between 1.1 Less Than 0.8 or Greater than 1.2
and 1.2
Example
• At the end of a week, you measure the progress of task X and
find that it’s 25% complete. Now, how do you assess if you are
on track to meet the task budget? First, a project manager
calculates the planned value for this task (at the planning
stage). Let’s say, Task X has a budget of $4000 and is expected
to be 50% complete by the week.
• Planned value (PV) of task X by the week = $4000 * .5 =
$2000
• Earned value (EV) of task X by the week = $4000 * .25 =
$1000
• Now, you also determine the actual cost (AC) of the work,
which involves other variables such as equipment and material
costs (say, $800).
Cont …
• Schedule variance = EV – PV = $1000 – $2000 = -$1000.
• Cost variance = EV – AC = $1000 – $800 = $200.
• The negative schedule variance indicates that the task is
falling behind, but the positive cost variance indicates that it’s
under budget. While dealing with hundreds of tasks in huge
projects, cost control can provide the level of transparency that
decision makers require to respond quickly to the situation.
Cont …
• The schedule performance index (SPI) is a measure of the
conformance of actual progress (earned value) to the planned
progress: SPI = EV / PV. ... When CPI or SPI are greater than
1.0, this indicates better-than-planned project performance, while
CPI or SPI less than 1.0 indicates poorer-than-planned project
performance.
• In the privious example ;SPI= 1000/2000=.5
Project Cost estimation techniques in Practice
A. Expert Judgement techniques
• Expert Judgment is a technique in which judgment is provided based upon a specific
set of criteria and/or expertise that has been acquired in a specific knowledge area,
application area, or product area, a particular discipline, an industry, etc. Such expertise
may be provided by any group or person with specialized education, knowledge, skill,
experience, or training. However, typically expert judgment requires an expertise that is
not present within the project team and, as such, it is common for an external group or
person with a specific relevant skill set or knowledge base to be brought in for a
consultation, Such expertise can be provided by any group or individual with
specialized knowledge or training and is available from many sources, including:
• Units within the organization;
• Consultants;
• Stakeholders, including customers or sponsors;
• Professional and technical associations;
• Industry groups;
• Subject matter experts (SME);
• Project management office (PMO);
• Suppliers.
Cont …
• The delphi technique is the most used tool in securing Expert Judgment. Under this
method the group's estimates are returned to the individual experts for review and a
second round of forecasts is received from the experts. With each round the degree of
consensus improves. The use of the delphi technique helps to reduce biased decisions
Other tools can be used, as:
• Interviews. This tool is best used when knowledgeable, experienced people are
available at an affordable cost and specific information is needed. Interview can be on
a one-to-one or a many-to-one basis wherein conducted by asking a series of questions
that will increase your knowledge of the project or a particular project activity.
• Brainstorming. It’s the kind of expert judgment tool is usually best use when input
from multiple experts is needed or when experienced people aren't available.
Brainstorming works by getting a group to focus on a problem and then coming up
with as many solutions as possible. Once the session has resulted in a number of
solutions, the results can be analyzed.
• Historical data. Is best used when records are accurate and both projects are similar.
Since a variety of documentations in project management matters most, so, it is very
nice to have historical record data in every expert judgment to ensure that you are in
line with what really it should be. Historical data uses the knowledge gained on a
similar past project.
Cont …
• Expert judgment can be applied to both bottom-up and top-down
estimating. Its accuracy depends greatly on the number and
experience of the experts involved, the clarity of the planned activities
and steps as well as the type of the project.
• Two examples of expert judgment are:
• Estimating the rough order of magnitude at the beginning of a project.
At that time, estimates are often performed top-down due to a lack of
team members. more accurate estimation techniques (such as
parametric estimating) may also not be available due to a lack of data.
• (Re-)estimating the efforts needed to generate the deliverables of a
work breakdown structure (WBS) by asking those responsible for
work packages and activities to estimate their resource requirements.
This type of expert judgment can lead to comparatively accurate
results.
Analogous estimating