Professional Documents
Culture Documents
FAIRNESS IN LANGUAGE
USE
1.1 Policies 2.1 Policies 3.1 GAD 4.1. GAD policies 5.1 Gender
articulating
support to GAD
Mandates and
Policies issued by the
reflecting the
organization’s
interest for gender
agenda/Strat
egic
Framework
of the organization
resulted in
bridging gender
responsive
policies
replicated by
establishing four
essential organization use
mainstreaming
issued (GFPS,
on GAD
adopted by
gaps clients
(internal and
other
organizations
elements of GAD GMEF Training) the external) as models or
Planning and
Budgeting issued
gender-fair
2.2 Policies
organization
4.2. Policies
standard
images
for consistency (internal and plans the results of
with emerging external) of the integrated gender analysis
GAD issues and organization issued with GAD
issuances (ASHA, VAWC) perspective 4.3 Vision, mission
accordingly and goals of the
2.3 Policies issued 3.3 Sector organization
1.3 Broad by the organization specific GAD integrated with
statements of use gender-fair policies GAD perspective
intentions or language and formulated by
aspirations the
reflecting the
images organization
organization’s
LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 LEVEL 5
Foundation Installation of GAD Application Commitment Replication and
Formation Strategic Enhancement and Innovation
Mechanisms Institutionalization
International/ GAD agenda and/or strategic 3.1 Implementation of GAD 4.1 Implementation and a GAD learning hub
national /local GAD- GAD framework formulated mandates, policies and monitoring of for its notable gender
related events PAPs monitored international, national mainstreaming efforts
observed by the GAD Plan and Budget (GPB)
developed is based on the GAD and local GAD mandates
organization
agenda, emerging issues, new Organization’s GPB and sustained and 5.2 Convergence
international and national GAD GAD AR prepared, timely institutionalized in the model resulting from
GAD orientation mandates and result of gender
and GST conducted submitted and endorsed organization programs partnerships
analysis
for the organization’s recognized and
clients (internal and Existing
2.3 GAD deepening sessions information,
Capacity development
on GAD conducted and
4.2 Sector specific GAD
capacity sessions
replicated by other
organizations
external) based on results of TNA or
Style of Communicating:
Linguistic practices
must change to be gender fair!
SOME SUGGESTIONS ON
HOW
TO USE NON-SEXIST
LANGUAGE
SC ADMINISTRATIVE CIRCULAR, S.
2006
SUGGESTED : The
lawyers use their brief
to guide them.
b. Deleting he, his, and him
altogether. Reword if necessary
SUGGESTED : The
architect uses a
blueprint as a guide.
c. Articles (a, an, the) for his;
using who instead of he
SUGGESTED : The
writer should know
the readers well.
d.Using one, we, or you
SUGGESTED: As one
grows older, one
becomes more
reflective.
e. Using the passive voice
SUGGESTED : The
proposal must be
submitted by the
manager today.
2. Eliminate the generic use of MAN.
Instead,use people, person(s), human(s),
human being(s), humankind, humanity,
the human race.
TRADITIONAL :
ordinary man,
mankind, the
brotherhood of man
SUGGESTED :
ordinary people,
humanity, the
human family
3. Eliminate sexism in symbolic representations
of gender in words, sentences, and texts by:
a. Taking the context of the word, analysing its
meaning, and eliminating sexism in the concept
TRADITIONAL : sportsmanship
SUGGESTED:
I now pronounce you husband and wife.
d. Avoiding language that reinforces
stereotyping images
TRADITIONAL: Mrs. dela Cruz
SUGGESTED : Ms. dela Cruz
TRADITIONAL : Dra. Concepcion Reyes
SUGGESTED : Dr. Concepcion Reyes
you
you
What makes language gender fair?
When do you say that language is not
gender fair?
you