Professional Documents
Culture Documents
S T R AT E G I C
MANAGEMENT
Corporate-level strategy’s value is ultimately determined by the degree to which “the businesses
in the portfolio are worth more under the management of the company than they would be under
any other ownership”
A corporate-level strategy is expected to help the firm earn above-average returns by creating
value
For the diversified corporation, a business-level strategy must be selected for each one of its
businesses
SEVERAL
• A diversified firm employs a separate
business-level strategy for each product
market area in which it competes and one
BUSINESS- or more corporate-level strategies dealing
with product and/or geographic diversity
LEVEL
STRATEGIES
University of Technology - Marie Bradford (2021) 5
LEVELS OF DIVERSIFICATION
A firm is related through its diversification when its businesses share links across:
o PRODUCTS (goods or services)
o TECHNOLOGIES
o DISTRIBUTION CHANNELS
The more links among businesses, the more “constrained” is the relatedness of diversification
Value-Creating
Diversification Strategies:
Operational and Corporate
Relatedness
the firm’s intangible resources, such as its know-how, become the foundation of core competencies, over
time.
Corporate-level core competencies are complex sets of resources and capabilities that link different
businesses, primarily through managerial and technological knowledge, experience, and expertise.
Firms seeking to create value through corporate relatedness use the related linked diversification
strategy.
The related linked diversification strategy helps firms to create value in two ways
First, because the expense of developing a core competence has already been incurred in one of the
firm’s businesses, transferring this competence to a second business eliminates the need for that business
to allocate resources to develop it.
Second, Resource intangibility - intangible resources are difficult for competitors to understand and
imitate. Because of this difficulty, the unit receiving a transferred corporate-level competence often
gains an immediate competitive advantage over its rivals
University of Technology - Marie Bradford (2021) 14
Corporate Relatedness: Transferring of Core Competencies
Risks:
Managers may be reluctant to transfer key people who have accumulated knowledge and
experience critical to the business’s success.
Too much dependence on outsourcing can lower the usefulness of core competencies and thereby
reduce their useful transferability
Different incentives to diversify sometimes exist, and the quality of the firm’s resources may
permit only diversification that is value neutral rather than value creating.
Incentives to Diversify
o Incentives to diversify come from both the external environment and a firm’s internal
environment. External incentives include antitrust regulations and tax laws.
o Internal incentives include low performance, uncertain future cash flows, and the pursuit of
synergy and reduction of risk for the firm.
Antitrust laws prohibit mergers that created increased market power (via either vertical or
horizontal integration)
Antitrust laws also referred to as competition laws ensure that fair competition exists in an open-
market economy.
Tax laws make sure that when a firm diversifies it does not pay less taxes as was the case before
1986.
Therefore, if firms have free cash flow to diversify they do not gain any additional value from it.
Diversified firms pursuing economies of scope often have investments that are too inflexible to
realize synergy between business units. As a result, a number of problems may arise. Synergy
exists when the value created by business units working together exceeds the value that those
same units create working independently.
But as a firm increases its relatedness between business units, it also increases its risk of
corporate failure, because synergy produces joint interdependence between businesses that
constrains the firm’s flexibility to respond.
Managerial motives to diversify can exist independent of value-neutral reasons (i.e., incentives
and resources) and value-creating reasons (e.g., economies of scope).
The desire for increased compensation and reduced managerial risk are two motives for top-level
executives to diversify their firm beyond value-creating and value-neutral levels.
Top-level executives may diversify a firm in order to diversify their own employment risk, as
long as profitability does not suffer excessively - as firm size increases, so does executive
compensation