Professional Documents
Culture Documents
GROUND DAMAGE
PREVENTION
Best practices for preventing
business aircraft ground damage
events
June 2002
Introduction
• Purpose of program - reduce aircraft ground damage risk by providing
“best practices” interventions
• Focused audience - corporate flight and maintenance crews
• Intended use - training and awareness tool
• Self-audit tool - gap analysis, how do we manage these risks? (tbd)
• Incident analysis flow chart -tool to look at human factors issues
• What this is not - a tool to manage FBO’s
• Size of the problem ? Many costs uninsured, estimated at over $100
million/year in direct costs
1. Towing
2. Ramp movements
t o w i ng
R a mp
4. Hangar movements Ha ng a r
0 10 20 30 40 50
Situation/Exposure
• Use of at least 2
wingwalkers while moving
aircraft from or into hangars
along with tug operator
• Team completes an area
risk assessment before
moving aircraft
• Perimeter floor marking that
delineates limits of aircraft
placement near hangar
walls
NBAA Safety Committee
Risk Exposure - Area:
Aircraft Movement In/Out of Hangars/Storage
Situation/Exposure
• Hangar doors - securing
methods to prevent
inadvertent closure due to jet
blast or high winds
• Aircraft wings should not
overlap other aircraft due to
settling hazard
• Hangar doors should be fully
opened before aircraft
movement
• Aircraft should not be moved
through propeller arcs
Situation/Exposure
• A visual inspection of the aircraft
should be completed before any
tow initiates
• The team should complete an
area risk assessment briefing
before moving aircraft - all sides
of aircraft perimeter visually
inspected for hazards
• Towing equipment - tugs/lektro
tugs visually inspected, brakes
checked, correct tow bar verified
Situation/Exposure
• Pilots should communicate
(radio) with unicom or for
taxi in assistance from FBO,
etc.
• Pilots should observe any
hazards related to ground
service equipment
movements or positioning
hazards - plan ahead for
departure routes
NBAA Safety Committee
Flight Crew Precautions
(departure)
• Flight crew should complete
a visual inspection of the
aircraft prior to departure
• Pilots should ensure that
wing walkers are used in
confined areas or areas
where marshalling person
cannot see all positions of
the aircraft.
• Pilots should visually survey
the ramp area for risks
during pre-start and taxi
Situation/Exposure
• The main gear should be
chocked at all ramp parking
situations
• A ground marshler should be
used to aid for taxi in and
departure from parking spots
• Ground air stair mats should
be removed before engine
start
Pilot
Ground crew
Event:
Two ground crew employees were positioning a Falcon 50 into a hangar when the left wing tip struck a golf cart. One
employee was operating the Lektro tug and the other employee was acting as the wing walker. The aircraft was being
nosed into the hangar. There was a golf cart being charged on the left side of the hangar and a car was parked on the
right side of the hangar. As the aircraft was being pulled in, the wing walker was at the rear of the aircraft going between
the right wing and left wing to monitor clearance. As the right wing cleared the car the wing walker started to move back
to the left wing when the left wing tip struck the golf car` `
Event:
A Lear-60 requested a GPU start assist. Upon completion of both engine starts, and proper shut down procedures of the
GPU, the line service technician noticed the GPU cable plug head felt very hot to the touch during disconnect from the
aircraft GPU receptacle. The crew was notified, shut down the engines, and requested a maintenance inspection of the
GPU receptacle and related components. The aircraft maintenance representative discovered a lose wire on the internal
bracket of the GPU receptacle located within the fuselage.
.
NBAA Safety Committee
Case studies of what can go wrong
Aircraft Towing and Hangar Storage
Event:
Two line service employees with the additional assistance of two aircraft crewmembers were preparing to pull an aircraft from a hangar.
The tractor operator misjudged the gear pattern noted on the transmission stick selector, and upon release of the clutch pedal the tractor
lurched forward several inches pushing the aircraft into another aircraft positioned directly behind. The intended tow aircraft suffered a dent
to the right outboard flap, and the other aircraft suffered a scratch to the nose cone.
Event:
The owner of a Mitsubishi MU-2 recently requested his aircraft to be towed from a hangar utilizing the customer owned tow bar. Upon the
initial tow bar inspection, it was noticed the tow bar was not equipped with manufacturer identification tags and the tow bar was bent.
The line crew notified their supervisor of their findings, and the supervisor instructed the crew not to use the tow bar. The supervisor
notified the pilot of the issue and requested the manufacturer labeled tow bar, designed for the aircraft be used. The pilot understood the
concern and had no issue with utilizing the approved tow bar. The approved tow bar was used with no further incident.
Event:
The ground crew was informed by the flight crew that the aircraft ( King Air 200 ) brakes were set in the off position. A tow was initiated
which resulted in damage to the brake and wheel assembly.
Event
An employee used the Lektro 8750 to tow a Cessna 425 Corsair to a hangar. After the employee captured the C-425 he installed the front
gate guard on the bucket of the Lektro. The aircraft was towed to and placed in the common hangar. The operator of the Lektro unit
lowered the bucket and released the winch strap prior to chocking the aircraft. The C-425 rolled backwards into the front gate guard
crushing the nose wheel fender. The nose wheel fender, which covers the rear of the nose wheel, was crushed against the tire and the
fender brackets were broken.
The result of
unauthorized
vehicle operation on ramp
areas
For Each
At-Risk Behavior
For Each UnSafe
Condition Ground damage incident
review process
Yes Did Condition No
Result from a
Behavior?