Professional Documents
Culture Documents
&
Plant/Facility Layouts
Complied by
Prof. Shrinivas Repak
PLANT LOCATION
- Prof. Robertson
Factors that affects ‘Location ’
decision
Labor Productivity
Political / Strategic Considerations
Costs
Infrastructure
Local Community Considerations
Proximity to Markets
Proximity to Suppliers
Proximity to Competitors (Clustering)
Location Decisions
Center-of-Gravity Method
Critical Scores
Success (out of 100) Weighted Scores
Factor Weight Sanand Singur Sanand Singur
Labor
availability
and attitude .25 70 60 (.25)(70) = 17.5 (.25)(60) = 15.0
People-to
car ratio .05 50 60 (.05)(50) = 2.5 (.05)(60) = 3.0
Per capita
income .10 85 80 (.10)(85) = 8.5 (.10)(80) = 8.0
Tax structure .39 75 70 (.39)(75) = 29.3 (.39)(70) = 27.3
Education
and health .21 60 70 (.21)(60) = 12.6 (.21)(70) = 14.7
Totals 1.00 70.4 68.0
Location Break-Even Analysis
–
$180,000 –
–
$160,000 –
$150,000 –
e
–
o s t curv
c
$130,000 – n a gar
m
– Ja
Annual cost
$110,000 – t
c os
– d
a ba
– mad urve
$80,000 –Ah c
– ost
c
$60,000 – kot e
j v
– Ra cur
–
Rajkot Jamnagar
$30,000 – Ahmadabad lowest
lowest lowest cost
– cost
cost
$10,000 –
| | | | | | |
–
0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000
Volume
Center-of-Gravity Method
Product Layout
Process Layout
Mixed Layout
Cellular Layout (Group Technology)
Layout by fixed procedure
Product Layout
Input
A B C D
Output G F E
Features of product layout
A E
C
B D F
Advantages:
Product Layout
Process Layout
Mixed Layout
Cellular Layout (Group Technology)
Layout by fixed procedure
Product
Design
Layout
Design
Schedule Process
Design Design
Input Data and Activities
Analysis
3. Relationship Diagram
Search
7. Modifying 8.Practicle
Considerations Limitations