Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Null hypothesis
there is no difference in response rate & survival time of patients with NSCLC
who are taking combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin and
toxicity among patients with NSCLC who are taking combination of paclitaxel and
carboplatin.
Alternative hypothesis
There is difference in response rate & survival time among patients with NSCLC
who are taking combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin and
toxicity among patients with NSCLC who are taking combination of paclitaxel
and carboplatin.
end points
efficacy end point
time to response, time to death (survival time) for 1 year among patients with
NSCLC who are taking combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin.
Safety end points
treatment related toxicity (percentage of patients develop Myelosuppression,non
hematologic toxicity )
Eg Granulocytopenia was most pronounced during the first cycle, during which
57% of patients sustained grade 3 or 4 toxicity.
Sample size
The calculated sample size were adequate(54)
Because phase II trial needs 15- 50 patients
Statistical analysis
• Event-free survival and overall survival were estimated using the method of
Kaplan and Meier.
• Since the investigator interested to determine one year survival after treatment
he/she uses the non parametric survival analysis.
• Confidence bounds on response rates were the usual large-sample estimates for
the binomial distribution were used.