Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Presentation Comm1
Presentation Comm1
1
TABLE OF
I.
II.
INTRODUCTION
CONTENTS
TERZAGHI'S THEORY - ASSUMPTIONS AND IMPLICATIONS-
VII. CONCLUSION
INTRODUC
TION
HIGHLIGHTS OF TUNIS SOFT
SOIL’ PROBLEMATIC
01
GEOTECHNICAL INVISTIGATIONS OF TUNIS
SOFT SOIL
very plastic
high proportion
of silt
very low
consistency
El Menzeh
Tunis center
WHAT’S CONSOLIDATION?
TERZAGHI'S THEORY
ASSUMPTIONS AND IMPLICATIONS-
ONE DIMENSIONAL CONSOLIDATION
∆ σ𝒗
STUDIED
OEDOMETER TEST
(kN/)
18.4
(m/s)
1.78E-9
20mm E (kPa) 3955
0.38
0.24
70mm 0.056
Porous stones inage Tunis soft soil * 0.0228
Metallic ring λ* 0.051
ANALYTICAL PREDICTION
CONSOLIDATION
140 kPa PREDICTION ANALYTIQUE DE LA
CONSOLIDATION
Porous stone
∆ 𝒑 ( 𝟎 , 𝒕 ) =𝟎
=1cm
=2cm
Tunis Soft Soil
=1cm
∆ 𝒑 ( 𝟐 𝒅 , 𝒕 ) =𝟎
Porous stone
Isochrone at time factor
NUMERICAL PREDICTION
CONSOLIDATION
PLAXIS 2D
Geometric Model
Boundary conditions
Calculation process
INTIAL PHASE
Geostatic equilibrium
CONSOLIDATION
PHASE
Time dependent of
settelement and
excess pore
pressures
calculation run
RESULTS AND
DISCUSSION
The variation of the interstitial pressure as a function of Tv
The primary settlement of a cohesive soil s(t) results from
the volume of water squeezed out. It tends towards a limit
value s(t = ∞) which represents the maximum value or the
final settlement. Their ratio is called the degree of
consolidation U.
CONCLUSION
The behavior predicted by the soft soil model "SSM" is in good agreement with the analytical values in terms of
An equilibrium between external loading and pore pressure is reached more quickly by the "SSM" model than for