Professional Documents
Culture Documents
daily intake
Jason Armanous
FOOD JOURNAL -
-
Time effective
Easy to track
- Can be less accurate, people tend to forget foods they’ve
consumed
- Can be more flexible - Not the best method to improve nutritional
- Small knowledge base needed knowledge/understanding
- Easy to audit
MEAL PLAN -
-
Straight forward
Easy to follow
- Little amount of flexibility can make it hard for some to
adhere
- Not much thinking/deciding required - Can be a poor tool for education if not used well
- Can be very effective - Can leave a person confused if they consume something off
- Great way to build good eating habits the meal plan
- Can be more rigid
- Little knowledge base needed
NUTRIENT TRACKING -
-
Most accurate
Great way to learn about nutrition in food
- Takes a fair bit of competency to use things like MFP
accurately
- Often most reliable when done correctly - Larger time & effort than other methods
- Easy to collect data - Can be ineffective for some populations eg. Those with
- Can be both more flexible or rigid poor eating behaviours
- Decision fatigue
- Can be difficult when eating out
BEHAVIOUR CHECKLIST -
-
Time effective
Great way to build good eating habits
- Can be vague
- Less rigid, can lead to decision fatigue
- Not much additional work -
- Can be more flexible
- Small knowledge base needed
Takeaways
• There are lots of different methods of tracking/recording;
• This should be tailored to individuals depending on their goals, preference,
sustainability & knowledge
• There are pros/cons of each method
• Combining methods is a viable option & can fill in any gaps/limitations
• Tracking our nutrition gives us the opportunity to learn from and
manage our eating behaviors for better outcomes.
• Can be a useful education tool