Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Bench: Chief Justice J.S. Verma, Justice Sujata V. Manohar And Justice B.N.
Kirpal.
WHAT IS THE VISHAKHA CASE ABOUT?
• Bhanwari Devi, a lady from Bhateri, Rajasthan started working under the Women’s
Development Project (WDP) run by the Government of Rajasthan, in 1985.
• In 1992, Bhanwari took up an issue based a campaign against child marriage.
• During this time, the family of Ram Karan Gurjar decided to conduct such a
marriage, of his infant daughter.
• Bhanwari attempted to convince the family not to perform the marriage, however,
she failed and they proceded with the wedding.
• On 5th May 1992, the sub-divisional officer along with the Deputy Superintendent
of Police (DSP) went and stopped the said marriage. However, the marriage was
performed the next day and no police action was taken against it. Later on, the
villagers began blaming Bhanwari Devi for the police visits.
• To seek revenge, on 22nd September 1992, five men, four from the Gurjar family-
Ram Sukh Gurjar, Gyarsa Gurjar, Ram Karan Gurjar, and Badri Gujar along with
another man, Shravan Sharma, attacked Bhanwari Devi’s husband and brutally
gang-raped her.
• The police attempted to play dirty tricks to prevent her from filing a complaint and
delayed in the medical investigation.
• At the police station, she was continuously taunted by the women countable the
entire night.
• Past midnight, she was asked to leave her lehnga as the evidence and go back to her
village.
• In the absence of adequate proof and with the help of the local MLA Dhanraj
Meena, all the accused managed to get an acquittal in the Trial Court.
• However, women activists and organisations chose not to be silent and raised strong
protests and voices against the acquittal.
• A PIL was filed by a women’s rights organisation known as ‘Vishakha’ which
focused on the enforcement of the fundamental rights of women at the workplace.
ISSUES RAISED BY THE CASE
• A request was made at the Supreme Court to frame guidelines for preventing
sexual harassment at the workplace.
• The court held that sexual harassment at the workplace was indeed violative of
the fundamental rights guaranteed under Article 14, 15, 19(1)(g) and 21 of the
Constitution of India.
• The court also defined what sexual harassment at workplace is classified as.
• It made a special mention that “Gender equality includes protection from
sexual harassment and right to work with dignity, which is a universally
recognised basic human right.”
• The Hon’ble Supreme Court outlined the rules to forestall sexual harassment at
the Workplace, known as ‘Vishakha Guidelines’, to be part Article 141 of the
Indian Constitution, to allow time-bound treatment of complaints.
VISHAKHA GUIDELINES
CONCILIATION INQUIRY
COMPLAINTS
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
COMMITTEE MAKES
BETWEEN PARTIES
INQUIRY REPORT
THANK YOU