Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Alonso SlidesCarnival
Alonso SlidesCarnival
MARKERS
Evaluation of
skeletal age is
needed
Skeletal Maturity
Indicators/Markers
Estimation of growth
potential requires
assessment of the
developmental age of the
individual.
The Basic Concept
Assessment through Assessment through
Radiographs Biochemical markers
● TODD TW 1931
Longitudinal study by
● RANKE 1896 ● ROTCH 1910 starting series of hand
First to study skeletal Weight, Height and wrist radiographs of
development progress tooth eruption were only children in Cleveland,
by means of wrist X- rough estimates of Ohio.
rays. physical maturity But he died in 1938 after
the publication of his 1st
report.
His study was continued
by William Greulich and
Idell Pyle
GREULICH & PYLE’s RADIOGRAPHIC
ASSESSMENT
● Book- Radiographic Atlas of Skeletal
Development of Hand and Wrist (1950)
● Atlas- standards – developed on the basis of
skeletal age as opposed to chronologic age
● Two Specific Steps were involved:
○ Atlas method
○ Bone Specific methods
● Atlas Method- the film is compared to the standard
of same age and sex acc. to chronologic age- then
the film is compared to older and younger standards.
Finally the standard most closely resembling the
film in question is chosen
Stage 1
● Absence of Pisiform
● Absence of hook of
Hamate
● Index finger- proximal
phalanx narrower than
diaphysis
Stage 2 Pre-pubertal Prior to adolescent growth
• Initial oss. of hook spurt
Significant amounts of
of hamate mandibular growth possible.
• Initial oss. of
pisiform
• Index finger-
Proximal phalanx-
epiphysis=diaphysi
s
Stage 3 Pubertal Onset
• Ulnar sesamoid
calcification start
• Increased oss. of all the
bones assessed in stage
Stage 4 Pubertal
• Calcified ulnar
sesamoid
• Middle finger-
middle phalanx-
capping of
diaphysis
INITIATION
Inferior border of 2nd, 3rd, 4th CV Flat
3rd vertebra wedge shaped
Superior border tapered from posterior to
anterior
100% pubertal growth remaining.
ACCELERATION
Inferior border 2nd and 3rd CV show slight
concavity, 4th CV flat
Bodies of 3rd and 4th nearly rectangular
65-85% pubertal growth remains
TRANSITION
Inferior border of 2nd, 3rd CV show distinct
concavity, slight concavity with 4th CV
Bodies of 3rd and 4th nearly rectangular
25-65% growth remains
DECELERATION
Inferior border 2nd, 3rd, 4th –distinct
concavity
Body 2nd and 3rd begin to look more square
10-25% growth remaining
MATURATION
Inferior borders 2nd, 3rd, 4th- marked
concavity
Body 2nd and 3rd almost square
5-10% growth remaining
COMPLETION
Inferior border 2nd, 3rd, 4th- deep concavities
Body- Vertical > Horizontal
Pubertal growth completed.
Modified CVMI- McNamara, Bacetti,
Franchi (2005)
Modified CVMI- McNamara, Bacetti,
Franchi (2005)
• Lower borders • Concavity at
of C2-C4 flat. lower border of
• C3,C4 trapezoid C2
shaped, superior • Lower borders
border tapered of C2-C4 flat.
post. to ant. • C3,C4 trapezoid
• Peak in shaped, superior
mandibular border tapered
growth occurs post. to ant.
on average 2yrs • Peak in
after this stage. mandibular
growth occurs
Class III treatment with maxillary expansion and protraction is on average 1yr
effective in the maxilla only when performed before the peak after this stage.
(CS1 and CS2 and in the mandible during both prepubertal and
pubertal stages.
• Concavity at • Concavity at
lower border of lower border of
C2, C3 C2, C3, C4.
• C3,C4 trapezoid • C3,C4
shaped or rectangular
rectangular horizontal
horizontal. shaped.
• Peak in • Peak in
mandibular mandibular
growth occurs growth ends on
on average average in the
within the same same year or 1yr
year at this before this
stage. stage.
• Ideal stage to
begin functional
• Concavity at • Concavity at
lower border of lower border of
C2, C3, C4. C2, C3, C4.
• C3,C4 • C3,C4
rectangular rectangular
horizontal horizontal
shaped or atleast shaped or atleast
one of them is one of them is
square shaped. rectangular and
• Peak in vertical shaped.
mandibular • Peak in
growth ends on mandibular
average 1yr growth ends on
before this average 2yrs
stage. before this
Tooth Mineralization/ Calcification
1
Mandibular Canine Calcification
2
Mandibular Third Molar Development
Engstrom et al 1983
Correlating the Stages of mandibular 3rd
molar development with skeletal age assessed
by hand wrist R/Gs.
Engstrom et al 1983
GuptaS, Deoskar A, Gupta P, Jain S.Serum insulin-like growth factor-I levels in females
and males in different cervical vertebral maturation stages. Dental Press J Orthod
2015;20:68-75
Parathyroid Hormone- related Protein and
Indian Hedgehog Protein
● Parathyroid hormone- related protein (PTHrP) was
originally established as the primary mediator of
humoral hypercalcemia of malignancy.
● PTHrP is synthesized at the periarticular ends of
bones and affects adjacent chondrocytes carrying
PTHrP receptors to retain their proliferation potential
and slow down differentiation.
● Chondrocytes distant from the influence of PTHrP, however,
differentiate and secrete Indian hedgehog protein (Ihh), which
triggers further PTHrP release.
76
OPG/RANK/RANKL system
● RANKL- Receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa
B ligand
Transmembrane protein
Produced by T-cells- in response to mechanical stress-
expressed on osteoblasts by factors that stimulate
osteoclast formation and activity.
77
● RANK- Receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B
Transmembrane protein on osteoclast precursors.
Increase in RANK implies Increase in osteoclast
formation.
● Osteoprotegrin (OPG)
“BONE PROTECTOR”- limits osteoclast formation
OPG ligand is identical to RANK and hence competes
to bind with RANKL.
78
OPG/RANK/RANKL system
RANKL expressed
on osteoblast surface
by T-cells
80
Biochemical Markers of Bone Turnover
81
Markers of Bone Formation
● Serum Total Alkaline Phosphatase (AP)
● Osteocalcin (OC)
● Procollagen Type I Propeptides
82
Serum Total Alkaline Phosphatase (AP)
● AP is a ubiquitous, membrane-bound tetrameric enzyme
attached to glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol moieties located on
the outer cell surface
● plays an important role in osteoid formation and
mineralization
● In adults with normal liver function, approximately 50% of the
total AP activity in serum is derived from the liver, whereas
50% arises from bone
● in subjects with high liver AP, results of bone AP
measurements may be artificially high, leading to false positive
results
83
Osteocalcin (OC)
86
3-Hydroxypyridinium Crosslinks of Collagen
Pyridinoline (PYD) and Deoxypyridinoline (DPD)
● PYD and DPD are formed during the extracellular maturation of
fibrillar collagens
● During bone resorption, crosslinked collagens are proteolytically
broken down and the crosslink components are released into the
circulation and the urine
● not influenced by the degradation of newly synthesised collagens
and their levels strictly reflect the degradation of mature i.e.
crosslinked collagens
● independent of dietary sources since neither PYD nor DPD are
taken up from food
● the pyridinium crosslinks are currently viewed the best indices for
assessing bone resorption 87
Crosslinked Telopeptides of Type I
Collagen
● The crosslinked telopeptides of type I collagen
are derived from specific regions of the collagen
type I molecule, namely the aminoterminal (NTP)
and the carboxyterminal (CTP) telopeptide.
● provide information on the age-dependent
changes of collagen in health and disease.
88
Bone Sialoprotein (BSP)
● BSP is a phosphorylated glycoprotein
● 5–10% of the non-collagenous matrix of bone.98,99 The
protein has been shown to be a major synthetic product of
active osteoblasts and odontoblasts
● BSP or its mRNA is detected mainly in mineralised tissue
such as bone, dentin and at the interface of calcifying
cartilage.
● he protein is therefore considered to play an important role
in cell-matrix-adhesion processes and in the
supramolecular organisation of the extracellular matrix of
mineralised tissues.
89
Tartrate-Resistant Acid Phosphatase
(TRAP, TRAcP)
● subforms, 5a and 5b are known, and recent research has
shown that TRAP-5b is characteristic of osteoclasts.
● The origin of TRAP-5a is unknown, but may be expressed
by macrophages. The two isoforms 5a and 5b are different
in that 5a contains sialic acid, whereas 5b does not.
● More recently, specific immunoassays for TRAP 5b have
been described and clinical results indicate that this marker
may be useful to assess osteoclast activity
90
Cathepsin K
● Immunocytochemical studies have shown that cathepsin K is
located intracellularly in vesicles, granules and vacuoles
throughout the cytoplasm of osteoclasts and that it is secreted into
bone resorption lacunae for extracellular collagen degradation.
● Recently, a new enzyme-linked immunoassay for measurements of
cathepsin K in serum has been developed.
● Due to the fact that cathepsin K is expressed and secreted by
osteoclasts during active bone resorption, cathepsin K, and
specifically its circulating form, may be a useful and specific
biochemical marker of osteoclastic activity.
91
Conclusion
● Growth modification therapy needs evaluation of
each patients maturational profile individually.
● Both maxillary and mandibular growth can be
closely estimated relative to the timing, amount and
rate of development.
● Skeletal maturity indicators can improve the
diagnostic expertise of the orthodontist.
References
● Julian Singer “physiologic timing of orthodontic
treatment. Angle orthod 1980;50:320-333
● Hagg U, Taranger J. maturational indicators and the
pubertal growth spurt. AmJ Orthod 1982:299-309
● Fishman L.S: Radiographic evaluation of skeletal
maturation
● HasselB, Farman AG. Skeletal maturation and
evaluation using cervical vertebrae. Am J
● Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara Jr. An improved
version of the cervical vertebral maturation method
for assessment of mandibular growth. Angle orthod
2002.
● Ruf S, Pancherz H. Can frontal sinus development
be used for prediction of skeletal maturity at
puberty? Actaa Odontol Scand 1996; 54:229-34.
● Tripathi T, Gupta P, Rai P. Biochemical markers as
● Radiological indicators of bone age assessment in
cephalometric images. Review, Magdalena et al. pol
J Radiol, 2016;81:347-353
● Evaluation of skeletal maturity using maxillary
canine, mandibular second and third molar
calcification, Giedre et al. European journal of
orthodontics, 2016, 298-403
● Reliability of the frontal sinus index as a maturity
indicator, Ajinkya A Patil, Ameet V Revankar. Indian
journal of dental research.
● Midpalatal suture Ossificattion and skeletal
maturation: comparative Ctscan and
Roentgenographiic study, Thadani et al.Journal of
Indian Academy or Oral Medicine and Radiology,
April-June 2010, 81-87.
● Midpalatal suture in young adults. A radiological-
histological investigation, Heirich and Faruk.
European journal of orthodontics 2001, 105-114.
Thank
You!