The document discusses gaining legitimacy and trust for the Tintaya case through negotiations between communities and the company. It describes the negotiation process, noting that it was initially difficult for communities to take risks in negotiations but they can now openly discuss concerns. The company has made clear that community concerns are important. Lessons from past experiences were applied, such as land-for-land agreements and co-monitoring, and decisions were made publicly at round tables where all parties, including NGOs, communities, and the company, were represented and able to negotiate under established ground rules.
Original Description:
Original Title
Framework of gaining legitimacy and trust for Tintaya case (1)
The document discusses gaining legitimacy and trust for the Tintaya case through negotiations between communities and the company. It describes the negotiation process, noting that it was initially difficult for communities to take risks in negotiations but they can now openly discuss concerns. The company has made clear that community concerns are important. Lessons from past experiences were applied, such as land-for-land agreements and co-monitoring, and decisions were made publicly at round tables where all parties, including NGOs, communities, and the company, were represented and able to negotiate under established ground rules.
The document discusses gaining legitimacy and trust for the Tintaya case through negotiations between communities and the company. It describes the negotiation process, noting that it was initially difficult for communities to take risks in negotiations but they can now openly discuss concerns. The company has made clear that community concerns are important. Lessons from past experiences were applied, such as land-for-land agreements and co-monitoring, and decisions were made publicly at round tables where all parties, including NGOs, communities, and the company, were represented and able to negotiate under established ground rules.
Moritz Eder Marcela Sarmiento Before the Negotiation Table After the Negotiation Table throughout process very hard for them to take risk, but now good consider company now as neighbour communities can openly mention their concerns and make decisions company made clear that communities concerns are important learned from latest experiences land-for-land 90%, co-monitoring not quite sure