CRITICAL

APPRAISAL
DALAM PBB
Dr. Retno Lestari
 CRITICAL APPRAISAL
 the process of carefully and
systematically assessing the
outcome of scientific
research (evidence) to judge
its trustworthiness, value and
relevance in a particular
context.
 looks at the way a study is
conducted and examines
factors such as internal
validity, generalizability and
relevance.
PERTANYAAN
 Is the evidence from a known, reputable source?
 Has the evidence been evaluated in any way? If so, how and by whom?
 How up-to-date is the evidence?
 How was the outcome measured?
 Is that a reliable way to measure?
 How large was the effect size?
 What implications does the study have for your practice? Is it relevant?
 Can the results be applied to your organization?
PERTANYAAN
Study design:
 What is the research question?
 How were patients identified and recruited?
 Who was included? Who was excluded?
 Randomization methodology: How was equality of groups ensured?
 Was the sample size adequate to answer the research question?
 PERTANYAAN
Analysis methodology:
 How was the analysis done? Was it appropriate?
 Was subgroup analysis done?
 Was secondary analysis done?
 Did the analysis adjust for multiple testing
 PERTANYAAN
Interpretation of results:
 Did the study answer the research question?
 Are the conclusions supported by the data?
 Is the argument convincing?
 What questions did the study not address?
 What new questions does the study raise?
 Is there possible investigator/author bias?
 Who financed the study, are there potential conflicts of interest?
 How did the authors interact with the study financiers?
CRITICAL APPRAISALS
 CRITICAL
APPRAISAL
TOOLS

 https://jbi.global/critical-apprais
al-tools
CA DALAM
PENELITIAN
KUANTITATIF
CA DALAM
PENELITIAN
KUALITATIF