Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MARINE INSURANCE 3
• Reduce risks
• Share expenses
• Share responsibility/duty
• Create binding laws/regulations
DOCUMENT FOR CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY
SEA-International
– USA Harter’s Act, 1893
– Australian Sea Carriage of Goods Act, 1904
– Canadian Carriage of Goods by Water Act, 1910
– Etc
– 1st attempt to unify carriage document was at the
end of WW1 by USA
– The above attempts and others influenced the
formulation of the H.R.(Hague Rules,1924)
REASONS FOR UNIFICATION
• Shipowners exempted themselves too frequent
from loses and hence contrary to public
policy/void
• Shipowners made rules to favour themselves only
• Cargo-owners/shippers were more at risks of loses
• Different nations differed in rules in the same
trade
• U.K needed free market economy
HAGUE RULE DEFINED
• The Rules governing the contract of Carriage of Goods by Sea
• The contract between the Carrier and the Shipper in ocean
transportation
• An Agreement of carriage of goods that uses a Bill of Lading or
similar document in water transportation
• A contract of carriage of goods by sea between the shipper/cargo-
owner and the ship-owner/carrier with which the terms of carriage
are generally given , accepted and endorsed as evidential
document called BILL OF LADING (B/L)
• HR=International Convention for the Unification of certain Rules of
Law relating to Bill of Lading signed at Brussel on 25/8/1924 (as
amended by Brussel Protocols-23/2/1969,21/12/1979)
HOW H.R.CAME INTO EXISTENCE
At the International Conference on Maritime
Law (ICM) in Brussel in October 1922,delegates
at the conference agreed unanimously to
recommend their respective govts. To adopt as a
basis of a convention a draft for the unification
of certain rules such as; Responsibilities,
Liabilities, Rights and Immunities attaching to
carriers/shippers under the Bill of Lading
Cont.
• In 1923,British govt. gave a draft convention
with a statutory effect and named Carriage of
Goods by Sea (COGSA) ,1924
• Brussel accepted this 1923 draft and signed it
on 25/8/1924
• USA adopted it as H.R. subject to some
modifications in the Carriage of Goods by Sea
Act 1936 but replaced by the Harter Act nor
repealed/dropped
Cont.
• HR is an International Convention to impose
upon commercial carriers of goods by sea
• HR outlines the basic obligations for a
shipper/ocean carrier regarding goods with a B/L
• It tries to prevent dissatisfaction and liability due
to the cargo damage
• 90% of the Maritime Nations used this Rules in
1936 as their guiding principles.
THE HAGUE-VISBY RULES
• Carrier
• Actual carrier
• Shipper
• Consignee
• Contract of carriage
• Bill of Lading
• Writing to include;telegra, telex.
Article 2 ;Scope of application
• A) all contracts of carriage by sea b/w 2 different
states
• -port of loading
• -port of discharge
• -one of the optional port of discharge =actual port
• -use of b/l or other doc. Showing the contract
• -b/l or other doc. As showing same
• B) the rules apply to all nationality of ship, carrier,
shipper, consignee , or any interest person
Cont.
• C) the rules do not apply to charter –party
contract but holds where b/l is issued
• D) rules apply to contracts involving series
carriage in future but not charter-party
contract
Article 3;intepretation of convention&
application
• Include International character
• The need to promote uniformity
PART II; Article 4= liability of carrier on
• A) taking over goods;
• -at port of loading
• -while on transit
• -at port of discharge
• B) when goods are taken from;
• -shipper , agent servant
• -authority , other 3rd party
• C) until the goods are delivered by;
• -hand to consignee
• -if consignee not available , then as directed according to trade at port of
discharge
• -handing over to authority not 3rd party at port of dicharge
• D) hand over at discharge port include consignee, carrier, agent , servant
Article 5; basis of liability cont.
• A) when carrier is in-charge of goods unless reasonable step taken and
proven ia liable to;
• -loss
• -damage
• -delay in delivery
• B) delay exceeding agreed time or non due diligence
• C) consignee may claim total loss if goods are delivered within 60 days after
expiry of delivery date due to;
• -loss by fire
• -negligence of carrier
• D) carrier not liable for live animals loss , damage delay due to specie risk
inherent defect
• E) carrier not liable due to saving of live resulting in delay
Article 6 ;amount liable to pay
• Liability of 835 units of account per package
• Based on other shipping units
• 2.5 units of account per kg of gross weight
• Liability ofr delay, loss/damage=2.5 times the frt.
Payable for goods delayed, but not exceeding the
total frt. Payable in that contract of carriage
• For consolidated goods/
pallet,containers ,package , shipping unit as
contained in the b/l are only involved
Article 7 and application of non contractual
claims
• All liability should be due to the contract of
carriage
• If agent , servant is involve,acting by his
employment then the liability shall fall on the
carrier/principal
Article 8 and loss of right to limit
duty/responsibility
• If loss due to act , omission done with intent to cause loss
• Recklessness , privy to carrier
• Agent , servant be liable on the same as above
• TYPE OF LOSSES;
• -particular loss
• -partial loss
• - total loss:
• Actual total loss
• Constructive/Assumed total loss
• General Average loss
General Average and Declaration
• Who declares the general average? –Master
• GENERAL AVERAGE DEFINED; That which has been given for all shall be replaced by the contribution of all
Conditions for Gen. av. to hold
• There must be a real and common danger but not mere
• There must be need for sacrifice
• The sacrifice must be voluntary
• Something must be saved from the peril due to the sacrifice
• SECONDARY REGISTER
• Claimants name
• Brief detail of claim progress and reason for delay-if any
• Acknowledgement of receipt of entry
• Attention so far given to the claim
• Exclu. 7
• This shall not cover expense/loss/damage due to;
• Strike or lockout
• Labour disturbance
• Civil commotion
• Terrorist act
• Political motive
• Exclusions as contained in B and C
Institute cargo clause B
• The risks covered include those reasonably attributable to;
• Fire /explosion
• Vessel stranding ,grounding , sunk capsized
• Overturning, derailment of land conveyance
• Collision with any external object other than water
• Cargo discharge at port of distress
• Earthquake, volcanic eruption, lightning
• Gen. Average sacrifice
• Minimising Losses;
• -the assured/servant/agent must reasonably try to avert/minimise
loss
• Assured must make sure all rights against carrier bailee 3rd party are
preserved hence the insurer can recover and indemnify the assured
on any charges reasonably incurred
• Any measures taken by the assured /insurer to protect save, or
recover the s.m. Shall not be waived/abandoned
Avoidance of delay
• The assured must act with reasonable
despatch in all conditions within their control.