motivating a group of people to act towards achieving a common goal.
The process of encouraging and
helping others to work LEADERSHIP STYLES
Autocratic Democratic
Laissez-Faire Bureaucratic Laissez-faire
Also known as delegative
leadership
A type of leadership style in
which the free rein leader does not lead, but leaves the group entirely to itself and allow group members to make decisions. Laissez-Faire
“Free Rein Style”
Characteristics Of Laissez-Faire Leadership Laissez-faire leadership is characterized by:
Very little guidance from leaders
Complete freedom for followers to make
decisions
Leaders provide the tools and resources
needed Group members are expected to solve
problems on their own
Power is handed over to followers, yet
leaders still take responsibility for the groups decisions and actions. Benefits When team members have the skills to succeed.
When group members are
experts.
When independence is valued.
Pros Can work for motivated teams with high
expertise and skills.
Creative teams may value the independence.
Works well when leader provides needed
information and materials at start of project .
Downsides Lack of role awareness
Poor involvement with the
group.
Low accountability
Passivity and avoidance
Cons Not good for groups lacking skills, motivation, adherence to deadlines. Can result in poor performance and outcomes Leader may appear uninvolved. Confusion over roles in the group. Bureaucratic leadership “ A system for controlling or managing a country, company, or organization that is operated by a large number of officials employed to follow rules carefully” Bureaucratic Leadership
Is the form of leadership that stands by the
rules and has a set system to work.
The leaders strictly adhere to the
organizational rules and policies. Also, they make sure that the employees/team also strictly follow the rules and procedure. Promotions take place on the basis of employees’ ability to adhere to organizational rules.
This leadership style is more suitable when safe
work conditions and quality are required.
This leadership style discourages creativity and
does not make employees self contended. Pros Can be useful when work procedures are necessary for safety, when safety risks are prevalent or when there are large sums of money involved.
The bureaucratic style can be useful when
the work involves very routine tasks. Cons The bureaucratic style isn’t good for teams and is an obstacle to create flexibility and innovation.
Bureaucratic leaders may not have
expertise or real qualifications. They may have gained their position because they conform to, and uphold, rules. This can breed resentment among the ranks. Examples of Leaders Winston Churchill Churchill’s key bureaucratic leader traits where his decisive nature and persistency to follow the plan.
His famous speech:
“Whatever the cost may be, we shall fight on the
beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills; we shall never surrender.” Collin Powell
Powell focused always on the mission and
the task ahead. It wasn’t ever about achieving personal greatness; he knew that great organizations succeed and fail together, not through individual performance He once said:
“ I’ve tried to do my best at
what has come my way…. I’m not without ambition. I’ve had a full and active public life.” Harold Geneen / ITT
He once said:
“Leadership is practiced not so much in
words as in attitude and in actions.”
This quote reflects the bureaucratic
leadership idea of keeping the organization and performance at the centre, not the individual achievements or traits. Alfred P. Sloan / General Motors
He created a hierarchial organization,
which focused on following rules and taking calculated risks. Sloan was a meticulous leader, although sometimes rather ruthless as well. He once said:
“ The greatest real thrill that life offers is to
create, to construct, to develop something useful. Too often we fail to recognise and pay tribute to the creative spirit. It is that spirit that creates our jobs.”