Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Selecting the Right Refrigerant for the Right Product for Each Application
Larry Butz GEA Consulting
Selection Criteria
Environmental
Safety
Compressor Type
HFCs
R-134a R-410A R-407C R-404A
HCFCs
R-22 R-123
Acceptable
HFC-134a HCFC-123 HFC-134a HCFC-22 HFC-134a HCFC-22 HCFC-22 HFC-134a HFC-407C HFC-410A HFC-407C HFC-410A HFC-407C HFC-410A
Recip
Scroll
Acceptable
Scroll
HFC-410A HFC-134a
R-410A
50% higher pressure than R-22 High ambient performance deterioration
R-407C
Zeotropic (glide)
Refrigerant Characteristics
(Water Cooled Conditions)
Refrigerant Atm Life1 ODP1 GWP 100 Yr1 Theor COP
Low Pressure HCFC-123 1.4 Medium Pressure HFC-134a 13.6 1.5 *HFC-152a High Pressure HCFC-22 11.8 HFC-125 32.6 5.6 *HFC-32 Mixtures 410A (32/125) blend 407C (32/125/134a)blend blend 404A (125/143a/134a) Flammable
1. Environmental Data for Refrigerants J. Calm & G. Hourihan HPAC August 1999 2. Tradeoffs on Refrigerant Selections, ASHRAE J. Calm & D. Didion Oct. 1998
Chiller Efficiency
Efficiency
Chillers, 300 tons and above ASHRAE 90.1-1999 [Oct 29, 1999] [Oct 29, 2001] DOE Recommended
Green Seal Environmental Standard GS-31
Refrigerant Characteristics
(Water Cooled Conditions)
Refrigerant Atm Life1 ODP1 GWP 100 Yr1 Theor COP
Low Pressure HCFC-123 1.4 Medium Pressure HFC-134a 13.6 1.5 *HFC-152a High Pressure HCFC-22 11.8 HFC-125 32.6 5.6 *HFC-32 Mixtures 410A (32/125) blend 407C (32/125/134a)blend blend 404A (125/143a/134a) Flammable
1. Environmental Data for Refrigerants J. Calm & G. Hourihan HPAC August 1999 2. Tradeoffs on Refrigerant Selections, ASHRAE J. Calm & D. Didion Oct. 1998
Supermarket Refrigeration
R-12/R-502
1995
2000
2005
2010
CO2
Performance
Good efficiency (lower temperatures) Low charge
If you want the highest environmental performance follow the Responsible Use criteria
HFC-134a can achieve high energy efficiency and is ozonesafe, but refrigerant emissions are potent greenhouse gases. HCFC-123 can achieve high efficiency and is not a potent greenhouse gas, but does have an ozone-depleting potential, albeit low. Energy efficiency is the main environmental consideration in the selection of a chiller
Responsible Use
Right Refrigerant for Application Minimize Emissions Use Life Cycle Climate Protection (LCCP)
Minimize total emissions of refrigerant and global warming gases from the production of power for the chiller over its lifetime
Indirect
Generated at Power Plant by burning of fossil fuels
16000000
Global Comparative Analysis of HFC and Alternative Technologies March 1, 2002 Arthur D. Little, Inc
14000000
12000000
LC C P kg C O 2 e q
10000000
8000000
6000000
4000000
2000000
0 R -123 R -245fa R-134a R-22 R-22 R -134a R -410A R-717 2 s tage LiBr
Centrifugal------------------------------Screw----------------------------------- ABS
An Oil-Free Design:
What Makes It Better?
for oil contamination Improves efficiency and reduces emissions Reduces both maintenance and operating costs Enables a 40%-plus parts reduction
relative efficiency
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
JMC 2001
Oil Contamination
15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4
% Efficiency Loss
Given these assumptions, the estimated annual energy cost would be:
1000 tons x 2000 EFLH x 0.576 kW/ton x $0.08/kWh = $92,160 1000 tons x 0.576 kW/ton x $15/kWh x 6 months = $51,840
$144,000
$144,000 x 8 percent = more than $11,520 per year or, in current dollars over a 30-year lifetime, almost $350,000, which is more than twice the initial cost of the chiller!
Samples
0
10
15
20
25
% of Oil in Refrigerant
Data taken from ASHRAE research project 601
100% Capacity
67% Capacity
Capacity Modulation
Higher SEER Reduced Cyclic Loss Lower Pressure ratio Improved Comfort Less Temperature Variation Enhanced Dehumidification Hotter H/P Supply Air
Cycle Enhancemen ts