Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Philosophy PPT 2
Philosophy PPT 2
Philosophy
of the human person
“Why am I here?”
The answer one finds will
determine his/ her choices in
life.
Not to ask a philosophical
question is to go through life
confused and lost.
There are things we
encounter in this world that
are simply puzzling and
settling.
The only solution to such
philosophical questions is to
ask them. The search for
answers only begins the
moment we ask a
philosophical question.
Metaphysics
- one of the main branches
of philosophy and it deals
with the so-called “Being of
beings”.
•THE EXISTENCE
OF EVERYTHING
BEING is the
material or
immaterial
existence of a
thing.
•BEING is a concept
encompassing
objective and
subjective
features of
existence.
The word has its etymology
in Aristotle’s book in Greek,
ta meta physika, meaning
beyond (meta) the physical
(physika) things.
The Universal and
the Particular
A distinction between the
universal and the particular
will further clarify the nature
of philosophical questions.
What is the difference of
Universal from
Particular?
Universal or Particular
1. Car
2. Cellphone
3. 2 pcs. Chicken thigh
4. Red HBW Ballpen
5. 2 umbrella
In dealing with
questions of the kind
cited earlier, the
universal and the
particular is dealth with
in a different way.
Universal or Particular
“Why am I
here?”
Philosophical questions
cannot be taken up in
isolation, that is, from
the very experiences
from which they arise.
Although part of the
reason why we ask
“why am I here?” is due
to some challenges or
struggles we encounter
daily
It will be impossible to
proceed to answering it
while avoiding other
aspects of human
experience that are
relevant to the question.
Thus, to philosophize is
to look at life from a
holistic perspective,
which include who and
what questions.
Martin Heidegger
- he is responsible for the
term “Hermeneutics of
Facticity” which simply
means that people interpret
things as they encounter
them in different ways.
Such is precisely what makes
philosophy different from
science according to
Heidegger. For Heidegger, a
scientific question is always
confined to the particular,
whereas a philosophical
question leads into the totality
of beings, and inquires into
the whole.
Heidegger’s essence of
the human freedom
provides that essence is
that which makes
something what it is.
• However, the pure
essence of freedom
is freeing yourself to
be who you are no
matter who you are.
•To free yourself from
the fear of others
knowing who you are
and respecting
yourself for who you
are, are the most
crucial steps for inner
peace.
Essence of a
HUMAN
PERSON
•Essence is defined
as the core nature
or most important
qualities of a person
or thing.
•An example of
essence is what is
captured of
someone's
personality.
A philosophical
question becomes a
revelation about the
whole reality from past
to present.
When we ask about the
essence of human
freedom, the problem is
not limited to man and
freedom,
Instead, we find that we
cannot avoid asking
about the essence of
man, the essence of the
world, and the essence
of God.
It is not simply a
question of what man is
free to do, or to become
but also requires that we
address the question of
what he is free from.
When we ask
philosophically about
freedom, we venture
into an inquiry about the
whole.
Limits are removed and
the inquiry is
broadened.
It is no longer a
particular problem but a
universal one.
After a philosophical
question is raised, how
does one proceed to
finding an answer?
Philosophy as its own
methods and criteria of
proceeding with its
inquiries.
For now, you have to
understand that every person
engaged in a philosophical
reflection must recognize that
possible answers to
philosophical questions
require adequate or rational
basis.
Answers that sound right
or seem right will simply
not do.
Philosophers have taught
that we can be misled if we
are not careful.
There are numerous
sources we go to for
answers such as books,
teachers, internet,
television, among others.
But philosophical
questions as earlier said
do not have ready or
definite answers.
Plato has warned us that
there are things that
deceive, confuse, or
mislead in this world.
Who is Plato?
Plato
- is one of the famous
philosophers who ever lived.
- He founded a school in
Athens known as the
Academy.
- He wrote Apology and the
Republic
S - socrates
P - Plato
A - Aristotle
A – Alexander the
great
•Socrates was a Greek
philosopher from Athens who is
credited as the founder of
Western philosophy and among
the first moral philosophers of
the ethical tradition of thought.
•Plato was a Greek philosopher
born in Athens during the
Classical period in Ancient
Greece. He founded the
Platonist school of thought and
the Academy.
•Alexander III of Macedon,
commonly known as
Alexander the Great, was
a king of the ancient
Greek kingdom of
Macedon.
•He succeeded his father
Philip II to the throne in 336
BC at the age of 20, and spent
most of his ruling years
conducting a lengthy military
campaign throughout
Western Asia and Egypt.
To know what is real
requires much
intellectual effort and
rational ability.
A person is responsible
for what answer he/she
holds on to.
This means we are to
blame in case we are
fooled into believing a
falsehood.
So how do we guard
against
deceptions?
God did not give us a life
manual but he gifted us
with intellect or mind
(faculty of reason) to
figure things out on our
own.
Faculty of reason
or rational capacity allows
us to pursue our questions
so we can come nearer to
the truth.
It is the best tool we have
that enables us to deal with
problems.
Our mind goes beyond our
instincts and pays attention
to our emotions so we can
effectively pursue meaning
and truth.
Truth and
Dialectics
Philosophers rely on the
human faculty of reason as
they philosophize.
Through this rational
capacity, they arrived at a
technique to resolve
philosophical questions,
which is called
Dialectics.
What is
dialectics?
Dialectics is an art of
refutation that dates back
to the ancient Greek.
Refutation
•the action of proving
a statement or theory
to be wrong or false
Philosophical
discovery is seen as a
result of collaborations
with partners in dialogue
or conversation.
Dialogues illustrates
how dialectics is an
effective means of
examining and evaluating
truth claims
Errors or inconsistencies of
a claim are demonstrated
using rational abilities
Socrates is most
noteworthy in his use of
dialectics. His method of
question and answers
illustrates how views to be
defended with consistency
and clarity.
It is not enough to claim
something as true.
One has to give good
reasons as basis for any
claim and the claim must
be able to withstand
further scrutiny and
examination.
Socrates’ life is a puzzle
because even three recognized
sources on his life presented
differing accounts. However, they
agreed that socrates philosophize
in the marketplace
He left no writings but
conversed with people from
all walks of life using question
and answer as a concrete
living out of his famous
advice – “ Know thyself”.
His commitment to
philosophy was the reason he
was condemned to death.
It is when our views are
challenged that we feel
compelled to defend those
very views.
The rational way to do it is to
give good reasons.
Do we need such hard
questions?
We need to welcome
questions that probe into the
core of what we claim because
it is the best way to reveal
what is not obvious.
In the process, we learn more
about our position or view –
what it assumes, what it truly
means, and what it entails.
An added bonus is that we
also learn more about
ourselves.
Our capacity to reason is
revealed and we may even
gain insight about who we are
at our core.
The dialectics of the ancients
later developed in the modern
era into thesis, antithesis, and
synthesis.
The exchange or confrontation
between differing positions
culminates to a synthesis, that
is a resolution of opposing
views.
Thesis – affirmative
Antithesis – negative
Synthesis – conclusion
GWF Hegel claimed that there
is a dialectical pattern even in
history as reflected in
resolutions of contradictions
through time.
Thus, the interplay of
opposing views is necessary
for progress.
Confrontations of this kind
must be avoided at all. We
need this exchange of ideas so
we can grow.
Even the collective view of
Filipino as a nation may be
interpreted as one that
develops through time
dialectically.
Our views are revised as we
experience turning points in
history.
From bowing to oppressors
and dwelling on sentiments,
we can now recognize
manipulative appeals made to
our emotion by politicians.
We now demand that our
leaders be responsible and
accountable to people whose
interests they swore to protect
and to promote.
Dialectics is indispensable
since it leads closer to truth.
When we inquire about
philosophical questions in
partnership with another, in
some form of debate, we learn
more because we are
challenged to think about the
question rigorously and
exhaustively.
A development or progress in
thought thus occurs.
Philosophy teaches us to be
open as we strive to know
better.
Debating (confrontation
without aggression) amiably
with someone allows us to
discover many things.
It reveals our beliefs and
challenges us to defend those
beliefs.
This rational activity teaches
us to hold on only to those
beliefs we can defend, and to
remain open so we can revise
views through time and in
collaboration with others.
Karl Marx
was trained in philosophy but
later turned to economics and
politics. He introduced
concept of “historical
materialism” which embodies
his theory that societies rise
and fall as a result of class
struggles.
LESSON 2
The Philosophical
Enterprise
“One thing I know is I
know nothing”
-Socrates
Wonder Curiosity
What is the difference between the
two?
Human beings want to
understand the world and to
know the truth for there are so
many things we have not
figured out.
We wonder about so many
things including the working
of the universe, mystery of
human experience, and even
the existence of the Supreme
being.
We wonder about things that
puzzle us.
Plato, claimed that philosophy
begins in wonder.
Wonder is the beginning for it
stimulates us to venture into
philosophy.
Wonder Curiosity
What is the difference between the
two?
It is beyond mere curiosity as
curiosity is usually directed to
a single, fleeting and
momentary object that
captures our interest.
It is beyond mere curiosity as
curiosity is usually directed to
a single, fleeting and
momentary object that
captures our interest.
We are curious on how a new
gadget works, but we may
wonder whether one can live
without the new gadget.
Example?
Our wondering here is
directed toward analogy and
the relationships of the things
We are beyond the
information we can readily get
about a new gadget. We are
wondering a more enduring
question.
Philosophy comes
from Greek term Philo means
love and Sophia means
wisdom
Thus we can consider
philosophers as lovers of
wisdom.
They are engaged in
philosophy because their goal
is to become wise
What is the difference of
knowledge from wisdom?