Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1
Noh Amit
Khantzian et al. (2014) acknowledged that the two main arguments posed against
the SMH are: (1) not all who suffer with pain and distress become drug dependent
and (2) there is as much, if not more, suffering [pain and distress ] as a
consequence of drug use.
He subsequently proposed that, in light of these questions and issues raised, it
was necessary to adopt a ‘superordinate or more overarching paradigm of the
addictions as a self-regulation disorder.
(1) and (2) above contribute to concerns that the direction of causality is not
clear-cut, and this shall be analysed through empirical assessment of the temporal
acquisition of substance use and other psychological vulnerabilities.’[the
importance of acknowledging other factors]
CNS Depressants: The hypothesis proposes that alcohol abusers cut themselves
off from awareness of emotions that may be potentially distressing by employing
rigid defences that can result in disaffected states.
Among the key psychological features of alcohol are its relaxing and sedating
effects (Dodgen and Shea, 2000). These effects are thought to relieve emotional
tension as they allow defensive structures to be softened (Khantzian, 1997).
Benzodiazepines, now much more commonly used than barbiturates are thought
to follow a similar course to alcohol but in pill form (Winger et al, 2004).
CNS Stimulants: The psychological effect of cocaine in the short-term is elevated self-
esteem, confidence, mood and energy state (Dodgen and Shea, 2000). This is due to the
increased dopaminergic and noradrenergic activity secondary to decreased vesicular
reuptake and transport of these monoamines (Winger et al, 2004).
The SMH proposes that those drawn to use cocaine will be either ‘high energy’ or ‘low
energy’ individuals. The former will have an increased need for elated sensations
(Khantzian, 1985; Khantzian et al. 1990) whilst the latter, who likely mirror a depressive
state, will use cocaine to escape anhedonia-- inability to feel pleasure (Khantzian and
Albanese, 2008).
Related to the view that AOD problems are secondary to other psychological
problems is the question about whether an alcoholic or addictive personality
exists. Clearly, there are alcoholics and drug addicts who seem to be free of any
identified psychological problems prior to their problematic use patterns.
Proponents of psychological explanations of addiction believe that there may be
an "addictive personality" that could be identified and that would explain why
individuals with AOD addictions often have problems with nondrug addictive
behavior (e.g., gambling, food, work, sex) following successful recovery from
their drug of choice.
However, this effort to identify the "addictive personality" has largely been
unsuccessful. As Miller (1995) noted, "alcoholics appear to be as variable in
personality as are non-alcoholics" (p. 90).
Jellinek (1952) also described the progressive stages (3)of the disease of
alcoholism and the symptoms that characterize each stage.
The early stage, or prodromal phase, is characterized by an increasing tolerance to
alcohol, blackouts, sneaking and gulping drinks, and guilt feelings about drinking
and related behaviors.
The next stage, the middle or crucial phase, is defined by a loss of control over
drinking, personality changes, a loss of friends and jobs, and a preoccupation with
protecting the supply of alcohol.
The issue of "loss of control" has come to be a central defining characteristic of
alcoholism and one of the more controversial aspects of the disease concept. We
will examine this issue when discussing criticisms of the disease concept.
Consistent with this concept (that the individual with addictive disease does not
reverse the progression of the disease even with a prolonged period of sobriety) is
the notion that addictive disease is chronic and incurable.
That is, if an individual has this disease, it never goes away, and there is no drug
or other treatment method that will allow the alcoholic or addict to use again
without the danger of a return to problematic use.
One implication of this notion is that the only justifiable goal for the alcoholic or
addict is abstinence, which is the stance of Alcoholics Anonymous
Abstinence must be the goal for those with addictive disease
Several arguments have been advanced to dispute the notion of loss of control.
Fingarette (1988) pointed out that if alcoholics lack control only after first
consuming alcohol, then they should have no difficulty abstaining. Obviously,
however, alcoholics do have difficulty abstaining.
If loss of control exists before the first drink (which would explain the difficulty
in abstaining), it implies a difficulty in exercising self-control or willpower, which
is a much different model of addiction.
(1) Perhaps the greatest advantage to the articulation that addiction is a disease
has been to remove the moral stigma attached to chemical dependency and to
replace it with an emphasis on treatment of an illness. We do not punish a person
for having a disease; we provide assistance.
(2) In a more functional sense, defining addiction as a disease has also resulted in
treatment coverage by insurance companies. Using medical terminology to
describe addiction has also led to greater interest in scientific research.
(3) For the individual who has problems with alcohol or other drugs (and for the
family as well), the concept of a disease removes much of the stigma and
associated embarrassment, blame, and guilt. You would not feel guilty if you
were diagnosed with diabetes and, therefore, a person with addictive disease need
not feel guilty for having this disease.
As we have said, people who believe that addiction is due to a lack of willpower
or to a moral deficiency may avoid treatment, since the admission of the need for
help is an admission that some character flaw exists. Therefore, an acceptance of
the disease concept may make it easier for some people to enter treatment.
(5)Finally, the disease concept has a logical treatment objective that follows from
its precepts: abstinence. If you have a physiological condition that results in
severe consequences when alcohol or other drugs are used, you can avoid these
consequences by abstaining from alcohol or other drugs.
If you attempt to use moderately, you will eventually lose control, progress
through predictable stages, and suffer the consequences. Since most individuals
who seek treatment for alcohol or other drug problems have experienced some
negative consequences already, this argument can be compelling.
(1) The orthodox precepts of the disease concept may not be accurate. There is
not an inevitable and completely predictable progression of symptoms and stages
nor a consistent loss of control. Therefore, individuals with alcohol or other drug
problems who may need some form of intervention or treatment may avoid help
since they do not fit the "disease model.“
(2) An adherence to the disease model may also result in a purely medical model
of treatment:
While this may have the advantage of motivating physicians to treat the alcoholic
in a nonjudgmental way.. .the average American physician is still both reluctant to
treat alcoholics and often ignorant about alcoholism....
Medical models tend to put the physician in full charge, focus almost exclusively
on physical damage, and perpetuate a medical "revolving door" which is more
humane than the drunk tank/prison but equally ineffective for long-range
treatment. It implies that nonmedical persons are unable to treat the illness....
(Royce, 1989, p. 123)
(3) The notion that the disease concept removes responsibility from the alcoholic
or addict for his or her behavior is frequently cited as a disadvantage of this
model (Royce, 1989). Since the alcoholic or addict is "powerless" over the
disease, inappropriate or even criminal behavior may be attributed to the
"disease."
Relapse may also be blamed on the disease, "If alcoholics come to view their
drinking as the result of a disease or physiological addiction, they may be more
likely to assume the passive role of victim whenever they engage in drinking
behavior if they see it as symptom of their disease....(Marlatt & Gordon, 1985, p.
7).
Fisher, G.L., & Harrisson,T. C. 2012. Substance Abuse: Information for school
counsellors, social workers, therapists, and counsellors (5th ed.). Boston, MA:
Pearson.
The Self-Medication Hypothesis of Drug Addiction: a Critical Evaluation.