Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CH 6 Controlling Function Edited
CH 6 Controlling Function Edited
Controlling Functions
By
Mesfin A. (PhD Scholar)
Future–Oriented
To be effective, control systems need to help regulate
future events, rather than fix blame for past events.
Multidimensional
need to be multidimensional in order to capture the major
relevant performance factors, such as, quality, quantity,
overhead, etc.
Economically Realistic/ Cost Effective
The cost of implementing a control system should be less,
or at most, equal to the benefits derived from the control
system.
Characteristics Cont’d
Accurate
Since control systems provide the basis for future actions,
accuracy is vital.
Acceptable to Organization Members
Control systems operate best when they are accepted by
the organization members who are affected by them.
Characteristics Cont’d
Timely
Control systems must provide relevant information soon
enough to allow corrective action before there are serious
repercussions or consequences
Reliability and Validity
Controls not only must be dependable (reliable), but also
must measure what they intend to measure (must be valid).
Characteristics Cont’d
Flexible
Control systems need to be flexible enough to meet new or
revised requirements.
Easy to Understand
The simpler the control, the easier it will be to understand
and apply.
Controlling Process
Establish objectives and standards.
Measure actual performance.
Compare results with objectives and
standards.
Take necessary action.
Establish Objectives and
Standards
• Performance objectives are defined and the
standards for measuring them are set.
• There are two types of standards:
– Output Standards - measures performance results in
terms of quantity, quality, cost, or time.
– Input Standards - measures work efforts that go into
a performance task.
Measuring Actual Performance
Measurements must be accurate enough to spot
deviations or variances between what really occurs
and what is most desired.
Without measurement, effective control is not
possible.
Comparing Results with Objectives and
Standards
The comparison of actual performance
with desired performance establishes the
need for action.
Ways of making such comparisons
include:
Historical / Relative / Engineering
Benchmarking
Taking Corrective Action
The corrective action to be taken depends up on
the type of deviation that exists.
When performance exactly meets (deviation of
zero) or exceeds (positive deviation) the standards
set - recognizing the positive performance
When standards are not meet, managers must
carefully assess the reason why and take
corrective action
Types of Controlling
Control can focus on events before, during, or
after a process.
Based on these three types of control are
identified:
Preliminary
Concurrent
Post-action
Pre-action/Preliminary/Preventive/Steering/Input
Control
Accomplished before a work activity begins.
Make sure that proper directions are set and that the right
resources are available to accomplish them.
Attempts to monitor the quality and/or quantity of resources
(human, material, and financial) within the organization
Aims to prevent problems before they arise
It is future oriented.
Concurrent/Screening/ Yes-No/Checking
Control
monitor ongoing operations and activities to make
sure that things are being done correctly.
rely on performance standards, rules, and
regulations for guiding employee tasks and
behaviors.
the purpose is to ensure that work activities
produce the desired results.
the only controls that can cope with contingencies
(unexpected events) that cannot be anticipated
When contingencies arise involving activities in a
transformation process, a yes/no decision is
required
decision must be made whether to:
continue as before or follow an alternative course, or
take corrective action, or
stop work altogether.
Feedback/Post-Action/Output Controls