To understand: 1. Banking institutions 2. Development of Banking in India 3. Scheduled Commercial Banks 4. Mobilisation, iending and investment of Banks 5. Reforms in the Banking sector 6. Payment and Settlement System 7. Diversification in Banking operations 8. Consolidation in Banking 9. Risk Management in Indian Banks 10. Regional Rural Banks 11. Cooperative banking 12. Non-banking Financial Companies
Origin in Vedic times First bank set up in 1683 in Madras Principle of limited liability applied in 1860 Three presidency banks amalgamated into Imperial Bank of India in 1921 – now known as State Bank of India Number of banks increased between 1941 and 1945 Banks under private ownership of Maharajas between 1947 and 1969 In 1969, Nationalisation of 14 banks In 1980, another six nationalised Between 1969 and 1992, rapid expansion of branch network Nationalisation killed competition and led to deterioration of operating standards First phase of comprehensive reforms in June 1992 Competition infused in 1993 by allowing setting up of private sector banks Second phase of reforms underway.
Scheduled commercial banks are those included in the second schedule of the Reserve Bank of India Act,1934. In terms of ownership and function, commercial banks can be classified into four categories: public sector banks, private sector banks, foreign banks in India, and regional rural banks.
Initially known as Imperial Bank Came into existence on July 1, 1955 Objectives: to promote agriculture, to help RBI in its credit policies, to help government pursue broad economic policies Seven subsidiaries Dominates Indian banking structure in terms of :Reach, Size, Market share, Business diversity and Position in government segment. GOI transacts its business through SBI At present, it has five subsidiaries Indian Financial System, 5e By: Bharati V. Pathak Public Sector Banks
Public sector banks are banks in which the government has a major holding. These can be classified into two groups: (i) the State Bank of India and its associates; and (ii) nationalized banks
Nationalization in two phases- in 1969 and in 1980 To widen the branch network At present 27 nationalized banks Now allowed access to capital market Edge over private sector banks in terms of size, geographical reach and access to low deposits Dominant segment is commercial banking – accounting for nearly three- fourths of assets and income. Responded to the new challenges of competition
In the pre- reforms period, 21 private sector banks At present, 12 old private sector and 9 new private sector banks Guidelines revised in January 2001 Norms for issue and pricing of shares revised in 2001-02 Level of foreign participation enhanced Tapped new markets, offered innovative products and services Reserve bank norms propose dispersing ownership of private sector banks. Indian Financial System, 5e By: Bharati V. Pathak Differentiated Banking
On 27 November 2014, the Reserve Bank of India issued the required guidelines that have to be followed for licensing of small finance banks in the private sector. Objectives: The objectives of setting up the small finance banks will be to further the financial inclusion by (a) provision of savings vehicles and (ii) supply of credit to small business units, small and marginal farmers, micro and small industries and other unorganized sector entities, through high technology but low cost operations.
The Reserve Bank of India issued the guidelines for licensing of payments banks on27 November 2014.
Objectives: The objectives of setting up of payment
banks will be to process further the financial inclusion by providing (i) small savings accounts and (ii) payments/remittance services to migrant labour workforce, low income households, small businesses, other unorganized sector entities and other users.
Operating in India since decades 43 foreign banks with 331 branches Set up subsidiaries Their presence benefited the financial system: a. Brought in new technology b. Enabled Indian companies to access foreign currency c. Active players in the money market and foreign exchange market Now permitted to have either branches or subsdiaries but not both Road map laid out by RBI will enable entry and provide them same treatment as PSBs. Indian Financial System, 5e By: Bharati V. Pathak Branches of Indian Banks Abroad
As on end March 2015, 15 Indian Banks have branches abroad SBI with 52 branches, followed by BOB and Bank of India PSBs foreign operations to be merged as part of the consolidation process As against 331 branches of foreign banks present in India, Indian banks have only 183 branches overseas
Indian Financial System, 5e
By: Bharati V. Pathak Setting up of Off-shore Banking Units
Operate virtually as foreign branches in India Cover only non-residents, deal only in foreign currencies and free from control of interest rates SBI opened up first off shore banking unit at SEERZ, Mumbai in 2003
Deposits: Household sector, corporate sector, financial institutions, rest of world(NRI and foreign consulates and embassies) and government Non-Deposits: Public issues; Borrowing in the call/notice market, repo, and CBLO; private placement; and ECBs
A stipulated target of 40% of net bank credit for both public and private sector banks A target of 32% for foreign banks Loan to SSI sector, Loan to NBFCs for the purpose of lending to SSI sector, housing loans in rural and semi urban areas, and educational loans reckoned as priority sector lending
Investment in SLR securities Banks holding 28 of their NDTL as SLR securities compared to the required 23% on account of Slow growth in demand for credit
Strong capital flows from abroad
High market borrowings of the govt
Zero provisioning on government paper
Risk aversion of banks
Indian Financial System, 5e
By: Bharati V. Pathak Investments in Non-SLR Securities
Narasimhan Committee (1991) recommendations changed the face of Indian Banking : recommended prudential norms, entry of private sector banks and gradual reduction of SLR and CRR Khan Committee (1997) recommended : universal banking, mergers and amalgamation and a risk based supervisory framework Verma Committee recommended greater use of IT, restructuring of weak banks and VRS for bank staff. The first phrase of reforms is aimed at : Improving the allocative efficiency of resources through improving policy framework , financial health and institutional infrastructure. The first phase focused on removing financial repression and stepping up prudential regulation The second phase of reforms aims at: - strengthening the banking sector - moving towards international banking practices - increased emphasis on corporate governance
Diversified to non-traditional para-banking activities such as- Factoring and Forfaiting Primary dealer system Venture capital financing Retail banking Insurance Loan syndication and consortium financing
Indian Financial System, 5e
By: Bharati V. Pathak Mergers and Acquisitions in Banking
Increased bank mergers Narasimhan Committee recommended formation of 3-4 large banks with international presence, 8-10 banks with national presence and local and rural banks Mergers to exploit synergies, cost cutting and acquiring new markets
Indian Financial System, 5e
By: Bharati V. Pathak Equity Capital Raised by Public Sector Bank
PSBs allowed to raise funds through equity subject to maintenance of 51% public ownership SBI was the first to tap the equity market Both public and private sector banks raised funds through public issues, private placement and ADRs /GDRs. Government injected funds to strengthen the capital base and restore banks new worth in three phases As at end of March 2005, public holding in six banks ranged between 40 and 49% ; in 12 banks between 30 and 49%;and in 4 banks, Government holding more than 90%
To ensure financial safety, soundness and solvency in banks Norms on capital adequacy, accounting, income recognition, provisioning and exposure Capital adequacy norms: CAR – A measure of the amount of bank’s capital expressed as a percentage of its risk weighed credit exposures Tier I capital: can absorb losses without ceasing trading Tier II capital: can absorb losses in the event of a winding up As at March 2005, 86 out of 88 commercial banks maintained CRAR at or above 9% Stipulated CRAR : 9 %
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) prepared a framework through a consultative process to secure international convergence of supervisory regulations governing the capital adequacy of international banks. This framework was finalized in 1988 and is known as the Basel Accord or Basel I. The objectives of Basel I were twofold: (i) serve to strengthen the soundness and stability of the international banking system, and (ii) to diminish an existing source of competitive inequality among international banks. The three main components of the Basel I framework were constituents of capital, the risk weighting system, and the target ratio. The central focus of this framework was credit risk and especially, country transfer risk. Basel I prescribed two tiers of capital for the banks: Tier I capital which can absorb losses without a bank being required to cease trading and Tier II capital which can absorb losses in the event of a winding-up.
Recommended a ‘one size-fits-all’ approach Assumed that the aggregate risk of a bank was equal to the sum of its individual risks These baseline capital adequacy norms were found to be inadequate as they almost entirely addressed credit risk Many large banks in advanced countries developed advanced risk measurement approaches to estimate the amount of capital required to support risks. Thus, the Basel I framework was found to be redundant in its approach.
Some common rules to provide a level playing field for banks framed by Basel committee Objectives of the new accord: Promotion of safety and soundness of the financial system.
Enhancement of competitive equality
Constitution of a more comprehensive approach to
addressing risks Three pillars Minimum capital requirement
Supervisory review process
Market discipline
All banks implemented Basel II with effect from March 2007
Banks to initially adopt standardized approach for credit risk and basic indicator approach for operational risk Indian Financial System, 5e By: Bharati V. Pathak Basel II Failed to Address Certain Issues Which Emerged During the Financial Crisis of 2007–08
Basel II was pro-cyclical; in times, when banks were doing well, it did not impose additional capital requirement on banks. On the other hand, in stressed times, when banks required additional capital, Basel II required banks to bring capital. The failure to bring in additional capital forced major international banks into a vicious cycle of deleveraging, thereby leading global financial markets and economies around the world into recession. Most of the assets of the banks were trading book exposures such as securitized bonds, derivative products, and other toxic assets which could not be liquidated in the times of crisis. Banks were highly levered and there was no regulation for limiting leverage. Basel II failed to address liquidity risk as part of capital regulation. which cascaded into solvency risk. Basel II focused more on individual financial institutions and ignored the systemic risk arising from the interconnectedness across institutions and markets, which led the crisis to spread to several financial markets.
Basel III is a comprehensive set of reform measures to strengthen the regulation, supervision and risk management of the banking sector. These measures aim to: Improve the banking sector’s ability to absorb shocks arising from financial and economic stress, whatever the source Improve risk management and governance Strengthen banks’ transparency and disclosure The reforms target at: bank-level, or microprudential, regulation, which will help raise the resilience of individual banking institutions to periods of stress. macroprudential, system wide risks that can build up across the banking sector as well as the procyclical amplification of these risks over time. The Reserve Bank issued Guidelines based on the Basel III reforms on capital regulation on May 2,2012 which have been implemented from April 1, 2013 in India in phases and it will be fully implemented as on March 31, 2018
Indian Financial System, 5e
By: Bharati V. Pathak Composition of Regulatory Capital
Banks are required to maintain a minimum Pillar 1 Capital to Risk-weighted Assets Ratio (CRAR) of 9 per cent on an on-going basis (other than capital conservation buffer and countercyclical capital buffer etc.). The Capital Adequacy Framework rests on three components or three Pillars. Pillar 1 is the Minimum Capital Ratio while Pillar 2 and Pillar 3 are the Supervisory Review Process (SRP) and Market Discipline, respectively.
Types: Credit risk, Market risk, Technological risk, Liquidity risk, and Contingent risk RBI issued detailed guidelines in Oct 1999 encompassing credit, market and operational risk RBI prescribed regulatory limits on banks exposure to individual and group borrowers Building up risk management capabilities of banks Assignment of risk weights of various classes Application of marked- to- market principle for investment portfolio Limits of deployment of funds in sensitive activities Know Your Customer and Anti- Money Laundering guidelines
Establishment of the Board for Financial supervision as the apex supervisory authority Introduction of CAMELS supervisory rating system Increased internal control through strengthening of internal audit
Came into existence with the enactment of the Cooperative Credit Societies Act of 1904 Supplements commercial banks Comprises urban cooperative banks and rural cooperative credit institutions
Mobilize savings from middle and low income urban groups Cater to small borrowers in non agricultural sector and rural areas Mostly engaged in retail banking Grew in 70s and 80s Supervised by RBI while rural cooperative credit societies by NABARD UCBs with Rs. 50 crore net owned funds or above can extend their area of operation Required to maintain CRR and extend loans to priority sector 1555 Non- scheduled UCBs and 51 scheduled UCBs Deteriorating financial health
Indian Financial System, 5e
By: Bharati V. Pathak Cooperative Credit Structure
Form almost 70 % of the rural credit outlets Receive refinance facility from NABARD State Cooperative Banks (StCBs) form the upper tier, Central Cooperative Banks (CCBs) the middle tier and the Primary Agricultural Credit Societies (PACS) the lower tier of the short- term structure StCBs – apex institutions – coordinating CCBs CCBs channelize funds from StCBs to PACs PACs deal directly with individual farmers State Cooperative Agriculture and Rural Development Banks (SCARDBs) and Primary Cooperative Agriculture and Rural Development Banks form upper and lower tier of long- term credit cooperatives Deterioration in financial health of rural banks
Supplement the role of banks More flexible structure than banks Provide a range of services Types: Hire purchase finance company Investment company Mutual Benefit Financial Company (MBFC) Equipment Leasing Company Miscellaneous Non banking Co. (MNBC) Residuary Non-banking company (RNBC) Housing Finance Companies Insurance companies Stock broking companies Merchant banking companies Primary Dealers
RNBCs Class of NBFCs which cannot be classified as leasing, hire purchase, loan etc Four companies operating as RNBCs Account for more than 85% of the public deposits mobilized by NBFCs MBFCs – notified under section 620 of Companies Act, 1956 MNBCs– engaged in the chit fund business Application of prudential norms to NBFCs Restrictions on bank funding to NBFCs Converting themselves into Universal Banks