Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BUSINESS LAW
(LAW101)
Chapter 2 –Malaysian Legal System 2
2
LEARNING OUTCOMES
• What are the differences between civil and criminal law?
• What is arbitration and tribunals?
• What is statutory interpretation?
3
Standard of proof The prosecutor must prove The plaintiff must establish
his case beyond a his case on the balance of
reasonable doubt probabilities
Negotiation
Negotiation
Cheapest
Private and confidential
10
Mediation/Conciliation
• Mediation/conciliation is a process in which a neutral party informally
brings together the parties to exchange their views in order to reach a
settlement
• Mediation
• The parties try to resolve a dispute with the assistance of a neutral third
party
• The purpose over here is to get the parties to reach a compromise
• The mediator will consult each party and look for common ground
• Conciliation
• Similar to mediation
• But the 3rd party plays a more active role by proposing solutions
11
Mediation/Conciliation
Mediation/Conciliation
This neutral person acts as a facilitator
Cheaper option
Private
It is extensively being used in settling industrial,
employment, family and consumer disputes
In Malaysia, conciliation is used for employment and
trade disputes
This provided in the Employment Act 1955 and the Trade
Unions Act 1959
13
Tribunals
• The work of the ordinary courts is supplemented by a
large number of tribunals set up by Act of Parliament to
hear and decide upon disputes in specialised areas.
• They deal with a wide range of subjects, such as social
security, employment, mental health, agriculture, land,
rents and transport.
• Tribunals are more informal courts which exist outside the
hierarchy of the ordinary courts. They fall into 2 categories
- domestic & statutory.
14
Tribunals
• Domestic tribunals are used by many private or
professional associations to resolve disputes and to
exercise control over or to discipline members, e.g. the
General Medical Council for doctors.
• Statutory tribunals are created by statute to deal with
particular types of dispute, e.g.
• Consumer Claim Tribunal
• Industrial Court
15
Advantages of Tribunals
• They have specialised personnel - the members of the
tribunal are appointed for their special knowledge in that
particular area of law;
• They are cheaper than the ordinary courts (tòa án thông
thường) because they do not generally use judges from
the ordinary courts who are paid high salaries, the
procedure is less formal & consequently involves fewer
people, legal representation is not necessary (although it
may be desirable) and costs are not awarded;
• They are quicker at resolving disputes. Tribunals are set
up when & where they are needed;
16
Advantages of Tribunals
• Because they are more informal, the litigants often feel less inhibited
than they would in an ordinary court;
• The strict rules of evidence can be relaxed, which encourages the
private litigant to present his own case or to be represented, by a
friend or trade union official;
• They reduce the workload of the ordinary courts which are already
overburdened;
• They are subject to the supervision of the ordinary courts & there may
be a right of appeal to such a court;
• They are more private as there is not a general right to access to the
public or press.
17
Arbitration
This is another mechanism for resolving legal disputes
The parties agree to allow an independent person (arbitrator) to
make a binding decision
In Malaysia, the Asian International Arbitration Centre (mang tầm
cao hơn xủ lý các vụ việc ở Asian) was established in 1978 to
provide for the arbitration process
The governing law is Arbitration Act 2005.
The Rules for arbitration are based on UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules
of 1976 with certain modification and adaptation as set forth in the
rules for Arbitration of the Asian International Arbitration Centre
The UNCITRAL Rules have been recommended by the United
Nations General Assembly by its resolution No.XXXI 98 adopted on
the 15 December 1976.
18
Arbitration
Resembles in certain of its characteristics with
litigation
Differ from litigation in the following ways: -
Arbitration
An arbitration clause needs to be inserted in the
contract
If not done, may be done at any time and choose
Arbitration
Decisions are called awards
Parties agree that these shall have a binding
effect
A court can enforce an arbitration award if a
Arbitration
Less time to settle a dispute compared to a court
hearing
Dealt with confidentiality
Formality depends on the choice of the parties
Advantages
Choose arbitrator
Informal
Rarely any publicity
Award may be enforced by court
23
Disadvantages
• Public funding is not available
• Appeals are restricted
24
Statutory Interpretation
• Acts of Parliament need to be interpreted for 2 main
reasons - ambiguity and uncertainty.
• Ambiguity occurs where various meanings can be
attached to a particular word or phrase, and uncertainty
rises where the words themselves are clear but it is
unclear as to what factual situations they are intended to
apply.
25
RULES ON INTERPRETATION
OF STATUTES
GOLDEN
MISCHIEF
26
Statutory Interpretation
The literal rule
If this approach is applied the judge takes the
APPROACH TO INTERPRETATION
DEPENDS ON INTENTION
IF LITERAL MEANING IS
CLEAR - NARROW APPROACH
LITERAL APPROACH -
WORDS ARE GIVEN THEIR
EXACT MEANING
28
APPROACH TO INTERPRETATION
DEPENDS ON INTENTION
IF LITERAL MEANING IS
GOLDEN APPROACH
CLEAR - NARROW APPROACH
LITERAL APPROACH -
WORDS ARE GIVEN A
WORDS ARE GIVEN THEIR
MODIFIED MEANING
EXACT MEANING
Statutory Interpretation
• The golden rule
• This is applied where application of the ordinary
everyday meaning of the word would lead to an absurd
result
• The judge departs from the normal meaning of the word
to the extent that it is necessary to give a sensible result
• Alder v George
• The phrase 'in the vicinity' within the Official Secrets Act 1920
was interpreted to include 'in' even though vicinity normally
means only the area surrounding.
31
STOP
Statutory Interpretation
• The mischief rule
• This is applied where the words of the Act are
ambiguous & uncertain
• The court under this principle ascertains the mischief
which existed before the Act and what interpretation
best gives effect to the cure intended by the Act
34
Statutory Interpretation
• The Ejusdem Generis Rule
• If general words follow particular words in a statute, the
judge must confine the meaning of the general word to
the particular class of things created by the particular
words
• Powell v Kempton Park Racecourse
• '….gambling (bài bạc) is prohibited in any room, office or other
place…’ => dấu hiệu sd Ejusdem Generis Rule
35
36
Or alternatively, go to
https://b.socrative.com/login/student/
QUESTIONS