Professional Documents
Culture Documents
03 Audit process
Background and Overview of the audit process
7
ISA 200 - Overall Objectives of the
Independent Auditor and the Conduct
of an Audit in Accordance with
International Standards on Auditing
Professional Judgment
What is it?
Why do we need it?
8
Qualifications Required in an Auditor
Professional Competence
Integrity
General Skills
Objectivity and independence
Confidentiality
Skills and competence
Professional behavior
Professional Skepticism
Professional Judgement
B.K., Finance and Accounting, @2023
Professional Judgement – What is
it?
Application of relevant:
Training
Knowledge
Experience
of:
Accounting,
Auditing &
Ethical issues
In order to make appropriate decisions
L.H., Finance and Accounting, @2022 10
Professional Judgement – Why do we need
it?
• Objective vs Subjective information
(Factual vs Judgmental)
• Eg: Client calculates a sales invoice, you have to verify the accuracy
• Factual
• Easy to prove
• Client provides for potential bad debt, you have to verify the accuracy
• Based on the future, judgmental estimate
• Tricky to prove
12
Professional Skepticism – What is
it?
• An attitude that includes a questioning mind
• Being alert to conditions which may indicate possible error or fraud
• Critical assessment of audit evidence
• Requires professional judgment
• Reliance on others
Do we believe everything we’re told?
Does the information make sense?
13
Eg: Client states that their profits haven’t
dropped, even though they’ve closed a few
branches during the year.
Does the information make sense?
Do you accept their statement without
question, investigation?
How would you ‘know’ it doesn’t make
sense?
Professional judgment
14
Overview of the audit process
15
Audit is a
Project
•An audit has an objective / goal
Creates a ‘product’ (Audit Report)
• Achieve goal by defining the
process
• Manage the process
• Thus… auditing can be regarded
as project management
16
• The steps in the audit process are laid out in the ISA’s
• Process must be:
Planned
Executed
Managed
Reviewe
d
17
Pre-engagement activities
Audit Planning
19
• Evidence
Execute your plan
Get the proof you need for your opinion
• Evaluation
What does your evidence indicate?
• Conclude / Opinion
If you have enough evidence, decide on your opinion
Prepare audit report
20
PRE- ENGAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
21
Applicable Standards
• ISA 200 - Overall objectives of the independent auditor and the
conduct of an audit in accordance with international standards on
auditing
• ISA 210 – Agreeing the terms of audit engagements
• ISA 220 – Quality control for an audit of financial statements
• ISQC 1 – Quality control for firms that perform audits
• Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants
KEY QUESTION
Can we accept a new client or continue with an old client?
• The entity is seeking to obtain better value for money in the provision of
audit and other professional services and/or a wider range of services.
• On change of ownership of an entity.
• Where an audit firm ceases to operate.
• Users of the financial statements and providers of finance (e.g. banks)
expect organisations achieving a size or status (e.g. being listed on a
recognised stock exchange) to have multinational accountancy firms as
auditors.
• The entity has a policy of auditor rotation.
• Current auditors do not seek reappointment.
26
Auditors Requirements– ISA 220
• Leadership responsibilities
• Relevant ethical requirements
• Acceptance and continuance of client relationships and
audits
• Assignment of engagement teams
• Engagement performances
• Monitoring
• Documentation
-In other words the auditor is worried about whether the firm can
comply with ethical requirements and the relevant standards
Required
a. Discuss what an auditing firm sets out to achieve by implementing policies and procedures relating to the acceptance of new clients. (4)
b. Comment of how information about a prospective client can be obtained. (4)
c. Comment on the matters to which your committee should give consideration in deciding on whether to accept the above audit
appointments. (25)
38
Suggested solution
1. Trigger Happy Ltd
a. The activities of a company such as this may as a result of a recent Act of Parliament, be illegal.
b. However, one of the major reasons for conducting preliminary engagement activities is to determine whether there will be any negative
consequences for the firm. The practice of hiring out mercenaries and being involved in war activities is morally questionable and is
probably not something which
the staff of the firm or
the clients of the firm would be particularly keen for Art Andersunn & Co to be associated with. It is therefore, an unwise
business decision.
c. Another aspect to consider would be whether we would be able to actually render our professional service. In a business like this, there
is likely to be shady dealing between parties, undisclosed movements of funds and balances etc, which would make auditing very
difficult, placing us at risk.
2. Bossman Ltd
a. The objectives of corporate governance spelled out in the ZIMCODE are to achieve openness, accountability and honesty in "big
business".
b. In addition, for listed companies, adherence to the requirements of corporate governance, including making certain disclosures such as
the integrated (sustainability) report in the annual report, is a ZSE requirement.
c. It is therefore unlikely that we would take this audit (despite the fact that it is a listed company with a high fee) as we might
place ourselves at risk by taking on a client who does not embrace the qualities of openness, accountability and honesty.
have great difficulty in reporting on those disclosures which must be contained in the annual report relating to corporate
governance.
d. If the Chairman of the company does not believe in the principles of Corporate Governance, the integrity of the company’s personnel
“charged with the governance of the company” may be in question.
40
Cont…
5. King Couriers Ltd
a. This company is obviously aware of what auditors should be doing, as it has successfully sued its
previous auditors twice.
b. This should not cast the company in a bad light, indeed they may well be the type of efficiently run,
successful company which we would like to work with.
c. We should be satisfied that our quality controls are of the standard which will prevent negligent
performance and the threat of litigation should not be the overriding consideration. This would be a
negative approach but may have some business risk implications!
d. We must be satisfied that the client’s actions with regard to the previous auditors do not reflect a lack
of integrity, and that we understand the business sufficiently to be certain that we can satisfy the
technical, resource, and time requirements.
6. Skweeze (Pvt) Ltd
a. It is unlikely that our firm would want to be associated in any way with this company.
b. Firstly, pornographic materials are generally not socially acceptable and any association with them is
undesirable and discreditable to the profession and its members.
c. Of even more significance is the fact that the company is involved in activities (escort agencies) which
may be illegal (prostitution) and which in no way would we wish to be involved or associated.
41
Cont…
7. La Paint (Pvt) Ltd
a. The difficulties with this engagement is the lack of independence.
b. Whilst it may be argued that the partner who is "creating" the lack of independence is not an audit
partner and that because we are a large firm, need not have anything to do with the audit of his wife’s
company, we must still be seen to be independent, which, if we take the appointment, we will not.
8. Interworld Ltd
9. The question to be asked here is whether we are large enough to service this international client.
10.Although we are a large firm, do we have
sufficient manpower
sufficient resources
international affiliations (even if we do have, we must still be large enough in our own right to
justify holding the position of principal auditor).
11.We will also need to consider whether we have the necessary expertise to conduct the audit e.g.
international law, tax practice etc (affiliated offices may be able to provide this).
4. On the positive side, the prestige of having a client of this nature would enhance the image and profile
of our firm.
42
Self Practice
Before your firm accepts any additional ongoing engagements, e.g. new audits, the partners meet to decide on whether the engagement should be
accepted. The firm is mindful of the requirements to conduct preliminary engagement activities including compliance with ISA 220 – Quality control for an
audit of financial information. The following prospective audit clients are being evaluated. Your firm has seven partners and a diverse portfolio of clients
ranging from small business entities to medium-sized companies. None of its existing audit clients is a listed company.
1. Vaughan’s Porn (Pvt) Ltd, a recently opened retailer of adult entertainment requisites. The business is lucrative and efficiently run. It is owned by a
group of businessmen who are not active in the business itself. They require that the financial statements be audited and have included the
requirement in the company’s Memorandum of Incorporation.
2. Fishy Business Ltd, a large fishing company in Kariba, which was recently convicted for exceeding its fishing quotas, and threatened with closure by
the authorities should it occur again as this was not a first offence. Should your firm accept the engagement, it will be the third auditing firm to have
been appointed in the last four years. The previous auditors have resigned. The company is a public company but is not listed.
3. Middleman (Pvt) Ltd, a medium-sized company which is about to expand considerably through a Black Economic Empowerment deal which involves a
large listed company. The listed company requires that Middleman (Pvt) Ltd be externally audited annually. Our firm has no experience in the industry
in which Middleman (Pvt) Ltd and the listed company operate.
4. Stonebridge (Pvt) Ltd, a small company which is owned by Harry Jack, the father of one of your firm’s partners. Harry Jack believes that having the
company audited externally adds to its credibility when negotiating with prospective business partners.
5. Mishin (Pvt) Ltd, is a medium-sized company in the light engineering sector. The directors informed your firm that they were changing their auditors
because their previous auditors had “different views” to them (the directors) on which accounting policies were appropriate for their company. They
have declined to provide specific details. The previous auditors would not comment on this stating only that the directors of Mishin (Pvt) Ltd had not
given them permission to discuss the company’s affairs.
6. Soldier Boy (Pvt) Ltd, a company which provides companies and governments operating in Africa with security personnel, including bodyguards and
equipment such as armoured vehicles and firearms. The audit fees paid to the previous auditors were substantial.
REQUIRED
Discuss the matters to which your firm should give consideration, when deciding on whether to accept the above prospective audit appointments.
43
44