Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Rationality The basic assumption that people are rational – that means
they have an objective, which they pursue in a reasonably consistent
fashion.
• For persons: the objective is utility maximization.
• For firms: the objective is profit maximization.
There are skeptics about the assumptions used in economics, but economists
argue that the theory underlying positive economics should be judged on the
basis of its predictions, not its assumptions.
Employees and employers are both mindful of their scarce resources and
are therefore on the lookout for chances to improve their wellbeing.
Market Failure: Public Goods – Market failure that arises when a person is
willing to consume a good or service but he/she is not willing to pay the
cost of its provision/production – “free rider problem.”
• Free rider problem can lead to under-investment in the provision of such good or
service unless the government can compel payments through its tax system.
Market Failure: Price Distortions – Market failure that arises when prices
do not reflect the true preferences of the parties to the transaction.
Special barriers to transactions are caused by taxes, subsidies, or other
forces (price controls) that create “incorrect” prices.
Examples:
Capital Market Imperfections – If workers find it difficult to obtain loans – to be used
for various purposes – the government might intervene by making such loans
available to consumers even if it faced the same risk of default
Externalities – Government can use policies to intervene in its decision on the
mandatory school-leaving age by looking at the lifetime benefits of various schooling
levels and comparing them to both the direct costs of education and the opportunity
costs of lost production – internalize externalities
Q = 45 – 2.5Wi R2 = 0.67
Any straight line can be represented by the general equation of the form:
Y = a + bX (1A.1)
where Y is the dependent variable; X is the independent or
explanatory variable; “a” and “b” are parameters or
coefficients to be estimated – vertical intercept and slope
We could model the relationship between the data in Table 1A.1 and
Figure 1A.1 as follows:
Q i = α 0 + α 1W i + ε i (1A.2)
Qi and Wi are firm i’s quit rate and wage rate, respectively,
α0 and α1 are the intercept and slope parameters; and εi is
the random error term – to capture unexplained factors .
From equation (1A.3), we can predict that if a firm paid $4 per hour in
1993, its annual quit rate will be
Qi = 45 – 2.5(4) = 35 percent
If firm i pays $18, its quit rate will be: Qi = 45 – 2.5(18) = 0 percent
Note that the relationship between wages and quit rates cannot be
assumed to be linear for low and very high values of wages
The estimated intercept (45) and the slope (– 2.5) are only estimates of
the “true” relationship, and there could be uncertainty associated with
these estimates
The uncertainty about each coefficient is measured by its standard
error (SE) or the estimated standard deviation (SD) of the coefficients
• SE or SD for the intercept term or constant (45) is 5.3
• SE or SD for the slope coefficient (– 2.5) is 0.625
• The larger the SE or SD the greater the uncertainty
The computed t-statistics for both coefficients (α0 and α1) are statistically
significant at either the 1% or 5% level
Given the computed t-statistics for α1 to be 4.0, we can reject the null hypothesis
of no relationship between W and Q in favor of the alternative/research
hypothesis, which shows the true relationship is negative
Qi = 57 – 4Wi → line XX