Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CHAPTER
1
Introduction
Modern Labor Economics: Theory and Public Policy, Twelfth Edition Copyright ©2015 by Pearson Education, Inc.
Ronald G. Ehrenberg • Robert S. Smith All rights reserved.
Chapter Outline
The Labor Market
Rationality The basic assumption that people are rational – that means they
have an objective, which they pursue in a reasonably consistent fashion.
• For persons: the objective is utility maximization.
• For firms: the objective is profit maximization.
Employees and employers are both mindful of their scarce resources and
are therefore on the lookout for chances to improve their wellbeing.
Market Failure: Public Goods – Market failure that arises when a person is
willing to consume a good or service but he/she is not willing to pay the cost of
its provision/production – “free rider problem.”
Free rider problem can lead to under-investment in the provision of such good or service
unless the government can compel payments through its tax system.
Market Failure: Price Distortions – Market failure that arises when prices do
not reflect the true preferences of the parties to the transaction. Special
barriers to transactions could come taxes, subsidies, or other forces (price
controls) that create “incorrect” prices.
1.2 Labor Economics: Some Basic Concepts
Normative Economics and Government Policy
Solutions to problems that prevent the completion of socially beneficial
transactions frequently involve governmental intervention – repeal the law
Examples:
Chapters
11-16 address special topics of interest to labor
economists.
• Structure of compensation schemes to induce productivity
• Wage differentials associated with race, gender, and ethnicity
• Labor market effects of unions
• Analysis of unemployment
• The phenomenon of income inequality and globalization
MODERN LABOR ECONOMICS
THEORY AND PUBLIC POLICY 12TH EDITION
CHAPTER
1A
Statistical Testing of
Labor Market
Hypotheses
Modern Labor Economics: Theory and Public Policy, Twelfth Edition Copyright ©2015 by Pearson Education, Inc.
Ronald G. Ehrenberg • Robert S. Smith All rights reserved.
1A.1 A Univariate Test
To test the relationship between wages and turnover or quit rates, we
need to collect data.
This type of analysis is called univariate because we are analyzing the
effects of one variable (wage rate – predictor or explanatory variable
shown on the X-axis) on just one other variable (quit rate – dependent
variable on the Y-axis)
Data collected for this type of test are called cross-sectional data
because they provide observations across behavioral units – cross-
sections – at a point in time.
Observations that provide information on a single behavioral unit over a
number of time periods are called time series data.
Combination of cross-sectional and time-series data are called panel
data.
Figure 1A.1 Estimated Relationship between Wages and Quit Rates Using
Data from Table 1A.1
Table 1A.1
Q = 45 – 2.5Wi R2 = 0.67
1A.1 A Univariate Test
Any straight line can be represented by the general equation
of the form:
Y = a + bX (1A.1)
where Y is the dependent variable; X is the independent or
Qi and Wi are firm i’s quit rate and wage rate, respectively,
α0 and α1 are the intercept and slope parameters; and εi is
the random error term – to capture unexplained factors .
1A.1 A Univariate Test
Line YY in Figure 1A.1 is known as the line of best fit for the
scatter plots A through J
Line of best fit (YY) is the one that minimizes the sum of
squared vertical distances between line YY and each
individual data points – YY is estimated using linear least
squares regression analysis, which yields:
Qi = 45 – 2.5Wi
(1A.3)
(5.3) (0.625)
Qi = 57 – 4Wi → line XX
1A.3 The Problem of Omitted Variables
From Table 1A.2, we see that:
• Quit rates are lower in the three firms (k, l, and m) that
pay high-wage, and they tend to employ older workers
who are less likely to quit.
• Quit rates are higher in the three firms (p, q, and r) that
pay low-wage, and they tend to employ younger
workers who are more likely to quit.
If the true slope coefficient (β1) is –2.5, with omitted variable
bias, the newly computed slope coefficient of –4 means that
the estimated response overstates the sensitivity of the quit
rate to wages.
• Equation (1A.7) ignores the effect that age has on quit rates.
• By omitting an important explanatory variable that affects quit rates
and this is associated with wage levels, spurious regression results
will be obtained.
Figure 1A.3 Estimated Relationships between Wages and Quit Rate
Using Data from Table 1A.2