To discuss the meaning of fundamental option; State defining moments in your moral formation; Explain the relationship between moral acts and character. What moral agent means; A Moral Agent is one who performs an act in accordance with moral standards. A Moral Agent should have the capacity to rise above his/her feelings and passions and acts in accordance with the moral law. A moral agent has the capacity to conform to moral standards, to act for the sake of moral considerations, that is, for the sake of moral law. REMINDER:
An insane person who does not have
the capacity to think and choose, cannot be a moral agent A dog is, therefore not a moral agent because it doesn’t have the capacity to conform to moral standards. It cannot knowingly, freely and voluntarily act. It does not have a mind and freewill. Like the dog, a robot cannot be a moral agent. The moral agent is a purpose-driven or end-driven. That end is sought for its own sake, an end no longer sought for the sake of another end, the highest good which is happiness. From the Christian point of view, a human person’s destiny in the world is not only to achieve cultural and moral perfection, but to attain the eternal happiness of the soul after death of the body. As a moral agent his duty is to know, to love, and to serve God, his ultimate end. Fundamental option is a human person’s basic choice or inner orientation either for a good life (directed towards others and God) or for a bad life (directed towards himself/herself and cut off from others and God) Man as moral agent adopts the “fundamental option,” a free choice to say “yes” to God’s invitation to follow His way. For the existentialist, like Jean Paul Sartre, the human person, the moral agent becomes what he/she make of himself/herself by choice. He/She is nothing no “essence” until he/she starts his/her “existence” by making choices. To the process philosophers like Teilhard de Chadrin and Alfred North Whitehead, whatever a human person, the moral agent, is or will be is a result of creative process. The moral agent has to create his/her end, purpose, or directions. He/she has to invent his/her destiny. Since there is no goal or end designed for him/her, he/she would completely be the author of what he/she turns out to be. He/she will be totally responsible for what he/she will be. Other groups, like Martin Heidgger, Gabriell Marcel and Martin Buber see the moral agent as a being-with-others, who is inseparably related to his/her fellow man. Together with other moral agents, the human person goes through life, designing his/her end guided by messages unveiled in a life of dialogue with others and with the world. For Brabander, the moral agent directs his/her life to improve, refine, develops this world in order to bring out the world to come. R. Franchaeur likewise claims that the moral agent should direct his/her life to the spiritualization of this material world THE DEVELOPMENT OF MORAL CHARACTER OF THE MORAL AGENT Defining moment refers to a significant life-changing event or moment of conversion in a person’s life A person who has moral character does moral actions more readily and more willingly than one who does not. Therefore, it is good to develop more character. It is, therefore, best for all persons to develop moral character. Moral character is formed by repeatedly doing moral acts. THE STAGES OF MORAL DEVELOPMENT According to William Kay, human persons go through three stages of moral development: 1) the amoral stage-egocentric, hedonist and prudential considerations; 2) the pre moral stage – authoritarian, ego-idealist, social and reciprocal considerations. And 3) the moral stage – personal, autonomous, altruistic, rational, independent and responsible considerations. THE STAGES OF MORAL DEVELOPMENT According to Kholberg human persons go through three levels of moral development: 1) pre-conventional, 2) conventional, and 3) post-conventional. Each level has two distinct stages and so Kohlberg has six stages of moral development. During the pre-conventional level, a child’s sense of morality is externally controlled. Children accept and believe the rules of authority figures, such as parents and teachers, and they judge an action based on its consequences. During the conventional level, an individual’s sense of morality is tied to personal and societal relationships. Children continue to accept the rules of authority figures, but this is now because they believe that this is necessary to ensure positive relationships and societal order. During the post-conventional level, a person’s sense of morality is defined in terms or more abstract principles and universal values which are now internalized. For William Kay and Kohlberg, every person is meant to grow into moral maturity. Moral maturity is evident in a person who acts based on his conviction rooted on universal ethics principles not because his act will bring him/her pleasure or pain, or that his/her act is in accordance with the laws or expectations of his/her particular group or society as a whole. Genuine moral development, which is attaining the post-conventional stage, the highest stage in Kohlberg’s is essentially development of conscience. Conscience formation begins with the deep seated decision to seek moral truth. It must stand on the firm foundation of integrity, sincerity, and forthrightness and must be sustained by the habit of consistently educating oneself by exposure to objective moral norms, and the rationale behind those norms. For conscience to be formed, it needs a guide, for Christians, the Church’s moral teaching and persons whose moral judgements are sound and in accordance with the Church’s moral tradition. Conscience formation requires a habit of on- going self – formation (moral information gathering) through study, reading and other types of inquiry. Conscience-based moral decision means the widening of human consciousness – from family consciousness to clan consciousness, community consciousness, town consciousness, provincial, regional, national, and international or global consciousness. Note this,
As one’s consciousness widens, the standards of
one’s decision making widens, one’s moral conscience widens, one matures. Moral development is internalization of moral norms. One acts morally based on his/her convictions not because the law says so or a person in authority orders so. Direction: Give your best answer to the following question/statements. 1. Based on Williams Kay’s and Kohlberg’s stages of moral development point, in which stage are you? 2. What are you doing for genuine conscience formation to reach post-conventional level of moral development, the full internalization of universal ethical principles? 3. Give reasons why students cheat/don’t cheat. Classify the given reasons based on Kohlberg’s six stages. 4. What was a defining moment in your life? What do you do to form your moral character? 5. Explain the relationship between moral acts and moral character. 6. From the innermost core of your being, whom have you chosen – God (goodness) or not God (the evil). How true have you been to your fundamental option? Is your life one of the communion with God or one of isolation?