Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Data Cleaning

    Uploaded by

    Raaj Chatterjee
    6 views4 pages
    Intracranial EEG (iEEG) data from electrocorticography (ECoG) and stereoelectroencephalography (sEEG) require different cleaning steps than scalp EEG due to higher bandwidth and less spatial filtering of iEEG, which can detect more line noise harmonics. When combining iEEG with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), the TMS artifact in iEEG shows an initial rapid decay within 20 ms followed by a longer decay around 200 ms, requiring new visualization techniques. Phantom iEEG can identify electrode and amplifier artifacts but not electrophysiological artifacts and may provide a model for detrending the TMS decay artifact from in vivo iEEG data.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    Data Cleaning.pptx

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Intracranial EEG (iEEG) data from electrocorticography (ECoG) and stereoelectroencephalography (sEEG) require different cleaning steps than scalp EEG due to higher bandwidth and less spatial filtering of iEEG, which can detect more line noise harmonics. When combining iEEG with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), the TMS artifact in iEEG shows an initial rapid decay within 20 ms followed by a longer decay around 200 ms, requiring new visualization techniques. Phantom iEEG can identify electrode and amplifier artifacts but not electrophysiological artifacts and may provide a model for detrending the TMS decay artifact from in vivo iEEG data.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views4 pages

    Data Cleaning

    Uploaded by

    Raaj Chatterjee
    Intracranial EEG (iEEG) data from electrocorticography (ECoG) and stereoelectroencephalography (sEEG) require different cleaning steps than scalp EEG due to higher bandwidth and less spatial filtering of iEEG, which can detect more line noise harmonics. When combining iEEG with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), the TMS artifact in iEEG shows an initial rapid decay within 20 ms followed by a longer decay around 200 ms, requiring new visualization techniques. Phantom iEEG can identify electrode and amplifier artifacts but not electrophysiological artifacts and may provide a model for detrending the TMS decay artifact from in vivo iEEG data.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 4

    TMS-ECoG/iEEG Data Cleaning

    Raaj Chatterjee
    Brain to Skull Conductivity Ratio is ~20:1
    TMS + iEEG vs EEG cleaning differences
    • Intracranial EEG (iEEG) includes ECoG (Surface) and sEEG (depth)
    • EEG bandwidth (~50 Hz), iEEG Bandwidth (~250 Hz)
    • iEEG has less spatial filtering, more line noise harmonics
    • iEEG may not require removal of eye blink/muscle artifacts
    • In TMS-iEEG, Rapid initial decay (~20 ms) then longer decay (~200 ms) is present
    • iEEG requires new visualizations

    3
    Phantom Verification
    • Will not reflect electrophysiological artifacts
    • Will reflect electrode and amplifier level artifacts (to some extent)
    • Can removing decay artifact in phantom serve as a detrending model for in-vivo data?

    You might also like