MALIWANAG ELEMENTARY

SCHOOL

SMEA
REPORT
JANEELYN C. LLANOS
Teacher In Charge
Maliwanag Elementary School is situated in the Southern part of
the Municipality of Esperanza. It has 47 kilometers from the district
2 of Esperanza. School Monitoring, Evaluation, and Adjustment is a
technology, mediated system that collects, processes, generates,
automates data relative to the result areas (KRAs) contained in the
Annual Implementation Plan (AIP).
 SCHOOL PROFILE
4th 1st
1 Enrolment Quarter Quarter
By Gender M F T M F T
           
Kindergarten 4 4 8 4 4 8
Grade 1 1 1 2 1 1 2
Grade 2 3 0 3 3 0 3
Grade 3 3 0 3 3 0 3
Grade 4 1 2 3 1 2 3
Grade 5 3 7 10 3 7 10
Grade 6 6 2 8 6 2 8
 SCHOOL PROFILE
ENROLMENT S.Y 2022-2023
12
3rd Quarter
10
10

8 8
8
7
6
6

4 4
4
3 3 3 3
2 2 2
2
1 1 1
0
0
Kindergarten Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6
 SCHOOL PROFILE
Enrolment S.Y. 2021-2022
200

99.9999999999999 4th Quarter 1st Quarter

50 34 34
26 23 26 23
25 21 19 20 20 20 21 19 20 20 20
15 15 15 15
11 11 12 12 1211 11 11 12 12 1211
12.5

6.25

3.125

1.5625

0.78125 10n 1 2 1010

3 84 85 6 10n 1 2 1010
3 84 85 6
rte de de d e d e de de 0000 rte de de d e de de de
g a ra ra ra ra ra ra ga ra ra ra ra ra ra
er G G G G G G er G G G G G G
i nd i nd
K K
 37
TOTAL
ENROLME
NT OF
SCHOOL
YEAR 2022-
2023
 PERFORMANC
E BASELINE
(for KPIs which VARIANCE HINDERING
are unavailable ISSUES
(Actual FACILITATING FACTORS FACTORS (factors
PERFORMAN IMPLEMENTED TECHNICAL TO BE
PERFORMANCE in the preceding TARGET FOR Accomplish (contributory factors to the provision hindering the
quarter, please THIS QUARTER CE FOR THIS ASSISTANCE (District/Division ADDRESS
INDICATORS ment for the of TA leading to increased implementation of TA
refer to the data QUARTER Level) ED BY
Quarter vis- performance) and achievement of
of the same DO/RO
vis Target) the target)
quarter of the
preceding SY)
KRA 1:
ACCESS
               

  - Monitored and Updated Constant Monitoring via Home

8  100%     on enrollment related visitation to Learners who are

activities like posting of Tarps, NLPA; Conduct of regular PTA
Kindergarten maintain of
Enrolment
8  0 posters, distribution of flyers, Meeting; tracking of learners
or bandilyo, and even sending progress and attendance;
rate
letters conducted SARDO intervention none  
 
- Conducted to facilitate the school enrolment none
Teachers' meeting to address to maintain or sustain enrollment
some issues and concerns with from the previous quarter; and
respect to the school strict implosion or adherence of
 
100% enrolment status per month. "No Collection Policy"
Elementary 37 maintain of 37 0     
Enrolment  
  100%
save
Kindergarten 0  0  0
pardos/sa Conducted teachers’ Conduct and
rdos Monitoring through implementation
their School Form 2 of the SARDO
submitted, Conducted Intervention
School teachers’ plan: Home
meeting where the usual Absence of the
visitation,
schedule is every friday concerned
exhaust
or as the need arise parents during
communication
provide TA to schools visits and
means to tap
who have SARDOs by stakeholders like meetings because  
of their busy time
implementing the the purok  
100% SARDO intervention council about
for their source of
income.
save plan per teacher, and the SARDO's
Elementary 0
pardos/sa
rdos 
 0  0 initiated the “Project
Pag-Abante" Project in
the school to reach out
within their
community  
during the
to learners in schools by meeting.
conducting feeding and
provision of basic school
supplies
 
 100% save of
Kindergarten 0 NLPA 0   0 none
Provided TA to Openness
Learners 
teachers’ and and The difficult
encourage to willingness terrain in
maintain NLPA of School reaching out
by provision of Head and the locations
template as teachers in of the
supporting reaching out learners and
documents in to NLPAs the signal
implementing the and the connectivity
100% save of Home Visitation overwhelmi to most of the
Elementary 0 NLPA
Learners 
0  0  Plan(What, How,
and When to
ng support areas in the
of municipality  
 
implemented) stakeholders

   
 0% failure
Kindergarten 0 0 % 0 
rate  schedules
should have
been
coordinated
per concern
so that for
Availability of every focal
Monitored learners' the data personnel in
late submission the
learning performance provided by
of reports and department
and assessment results teachers with will have
other activities
through quarterly their Individual focus and
disrupting the
reports and provided Learning perform their
conduct of
TA for intervention Monitoring duties and
intervention to responsibiliti
based from the least Plan and
learners es with
0% failure learned skills assessment
 
Elementary 0 0%  - 0% utmost

 
rate  results quality and

  significance
most
importantly
in the
teaching-
learning

process  
Kindergarten 0 0  0  0  -  -  -  - 

Conducted No orientation
Elementary 0 0 0  0  Child -  on MADRASAH  
Mapping  Program 
 No. of 4 P’s Recipients
GRADE MALE FEMALE TOTAL
KINDER 1 2 3
GRADE ONE 3 1 4
GRADE TWO 4 1 5
GRADE THREE 1 3 4

GRADE FOUR 3 7 10

GRADE FIVE 5 2 7
GRADE SIX 2 4 6

No. of Schools utilizing
contextualized/   0 0
indigenized lesson plans
No. of contextualized/
  0 00
indigenized lesson plans
No. of Teachers
  0 0
underwent IPED Program
No Teachers
Conducted School Head's meeting
were trained on
0% to the IPED Implementing Schools
0 - Lesson Plan none
increase from the Division Office to provide
making based on
some updates of the IPEd program
IP- IKSP
presence of conduct of
limited time in
teachers trained
Ensured and encouraged that mentoring fellow orientation to
for
contextualization and indigenization of mentors to learn newly hired
contextualization
0% lessons are mainstreamed in the lesson more, unlearn, and teachers and
0 and re-orientation
increase plan through Pre-observation conferences
indigenization of
relearn concepts to teachers in
, instructional supervision, and conduct of and ideas in IPEd
lesson plans that
post conferences contextualization Implementing
could mentor
and indigenization Schools
fellow mentors
Facilitated the participation of the IPED Established IPEd
Implementing Schools to Division and system and
0%
0 other learning and activities providers for referral paths in Time and budget none
increase learning opportunities and updates on the the conduct of
IPEd program IPed activities
 No. of 4 P’s Recipients
GRADE MALE FEMALE TOTAL
KINDER 2 2 4
GRADE ONE 3 0 3
GRADE TWO 3 2 5
GRADE THREE 2 2 4

GRADE FOUR 3 7 10

GRADE FIVE 4 1 5
GRADE SIX 2 3 5
COMMON HEALTH PROBLEMS OF TEACHING
AND NON TEACHING PERSONNEL
 Pre-test
(FILIPINO)                
Grade 3
 0% non-
Non-reader 0
reader
0%   Guided and Mentored teachers  
in crafting and implementing
Frustration 0% non- their reading programs; and
reader
0
reader
0%   provided avenue for schools to  
gain financial support from Time
LGU to their reading program Financial support of Constraints
Instructional 0% non- LGU to reading and limited
reader
2
reader
29%   under LCPC fund and under
Programs of the or restricted  
the umbrella of the District's
Reading program "Project schools through LCPC face-to-face
CHARM"  
Fund
interaction

   
Independent 0% non-
Reader
5
reader
71%      
 
 Pre-test
(FILIPINO)                
Grade 4
 0% non- Guided and Mentored
Financial support of
Non-reader 0
reader
0%   school heads in crafting
LGU to reading
 
and implementing their
Programs of the
Frustration 0% non- 27 reading programs; and
schools through Time Constraints
reader
3
reader %
  provided avenue for
LCPC Fund and and limited or  
schools to gain financial
support of ACCORD restricted face-to-
support from LGU to
Instructional 0% non- 27 to the "Brigada face interaction
reader
3
reader %
  their reading program
under LCPC fund and
Pagbasa" of the 3    
schools through  
under the umbrella of the
provision of reading  
District's Reading
Independent 0% non- 45 materials, LSAs, and
Reader
5
reader %
  program "Project
BEEP"
training  
opportunities.  
  
 Pre-test
(FILIPINO)                
Grade 5
0% non- Guided and Mentored school
Non-reader 0 0%   heads in crafting and Financial support of LGU  
reader implementing their reading to reading Programs of the
Time
programs; and provided schools through LCPC
Frustration 0% non- Constraints
0 0%   avenue for schools to gain Fund and support of
and limited  
reader reader financial support from LGU to ACCORD to the "Brigada
or restricted
their reading program under Pagbasa" of the 3 schools
face-to-face
Instructional 0% non- LCPC fund and under the through provision of
3 38%   umbrella of the District's reading materials, LSAs,
interaction
 
reader reader Reading program "Project and training opportunities.  
BEEP"
   
Independent 0% non-    
5 63%      
Reader reader    
 
 Pre-test
(FILIPINO)                
Grade 6
0%
Non-reader 0 non- 0%    
reader Guided and Mentored
school heads in crafting Financial support of LGU
0% and implementing their to reading Programs of
Frustration the schools through LCPC
0 non- 0%   reading programs; and
Fund and support of Time Constraints  
reader provided avenue for
reader schools to gain financial ACCORD to the "Brigada and limited or
0% support from LGU to their Pagbasa" of the 3 schools restricted face-to-
Instructional
1 non- 17%  
reading program under through provision of
face interaction   
LCPC fund and under the reading materials, LSAs,
reader and training
reader umbrella of the District's

0%
Reading program "Project  
opportunities.
CHARM"
Independent
5 non- 83%    
Reader
reader
 Pre-test
(ENGLISH)                
Grade 4
0% non-
Non-reader 0
reader
0%  0% Guided and Mentored school
 
Financial support of LGU
heads in crafting and
Frustration 0% non- implementing their reading
to reading Programs of the

reader
3
reader
27%  27% programs; and provided avenue
schools through LCPC
Time Constraints and
 
Fund and support of
for schools to gain financial
ACCORD to the "Brigada limited or restricted face-to-
Instructional 0% non- support from LGU to their
Pagbasa" of the 3 schools  
reader
3
reader
27%  27% reading program under LCPC
through provision of
face interaction.  
fund and under the umbrella of
reading materials, LSAs,
the District's Reading program
and training opportunities.
Independent 0% non- "Project BEEP"
Reader
5
reader
45%  45%  
 Pre-test
(ENGLISH)              
Grade 5
0% non- Guided and Mentored school
Non-reader 0 0%  0% heads in crafting and  
reader implementing their reading
programs; and provided
Frustration 0% non- Financial support of LGU to Time Constraints and
0 0%  0% avenue for schools to gain
reading Programs of the limited or restricted  
reader reader financial support from LGU
schools through LCPC Fund face-to-face
to their reading program
and support of ACCORD to interaction
Instructional 0% non- under LCPC fund and under
reader
3
reader
38%  38% the umbrella of the District's the "Brigada Pagbasa“.     
Reading program "Project
BEEP"    
Independent 0% non-      
5 63%  63%    
Reader reader
 
 Pre-test
(ENGLISH)                
Grade 6
0% non- Guided and Mentored school Financial support of LGU to
Non-reader 0 0%  0% reading Programs of the schools  
reader heads in crafting and
implementing their reading through LCPC Fund and support Time Constraints and
Frustration 0% non- programs; and provided of ACCORD to the "Brigada
limited or restricted
0 0%  0% avenue for schools to gain Pagbasa" of the 3 schools  
reader reader financial support from LGU through provision of reading
face-to-face interaction
to their reading program materials, LSAs, and training  
Instructional 0% non- opportunities.
1 17%  17% under LCPC fund and under
   
reader reader the umbrella of the District's  
Reading program "Project  
Independent 0% non- CHARM"  
5 83%  83%      
Reader reader
Pre-test (MTB-
MLE)                
KINDER
100% Guided and Mentored
100 school heads in crafting
Non-reader 4 non- 100% and implementing their Financial support of LGU to  
%
reader reading programs; and
provided avenue for
reading Programs of the
schools through LCPC
100% schools to gain financial Fund and support of
Time Constraints
Frustration and limited or
0 non- 0%  -0% support from LGU to ACCORD to the "Brigada
restricted face-to-  
reader their reading program Pagbasa" of the 3 schools
reader under LCPC fund and through provision of
face interaction

100% under the umbrella of reading materials, LSAs,  

Instructional the District's Reading and training opportunities.
 
0 non- 0%  -0% program "Project
   
reader
reader BEEP"  
100%    
Independent  
0 non- 0%  -0%  
Reader
reader  
Pre-test (MTB-
               
MLE) Grade 1
16.7% non-
Non-reader 1 16.7%  17.6% Financial support of  
reader LGU to reading
Guided and Mentored Programs of the
 - school heads in crafting and schools through Time Constraints
Frustration 16.7% non- 33.33
2 33.33 implementing their reading LCPC Fund and and limited or
 
reader reader % programs; and provided support of ACCORD restricted face-to-
% financial
avenue for schools to gain to the "Brigada face interaction

 -
support from LGU Pagbasa" of the 3
to their reading program schools through
 
Instructional 16.7% non- 33.33 under LCPC fund and  
2 33.33 under provision of reading  
reader reader % the umbrella of the materials, LSAs, and
 
% District's Reading program
"Project BEEP"
training
opportunities.
Independent 16.7% non-
0 0%  -0%  
Reader reader
 Pre-test
(MTB-MLE)                
Grade 2
20% non- Guided and Mentored school Financial support of LGU
Non-reader 1 20%  20% heads in crafting and to reading Programs of the  
reader implementing their reading schools through LCPC
programs; and provided Time Constraints
Fund and support of
Frustration 20% non- and limited or
2 40%  -40% avenue for schools to gain ACCORD to the "Brigada
restricted face-to-  
reader reader financial support from LGU Pagbasa" of the 3 schools
face interaction
to their reading program through provision of
Instructional 20% non- under LCPC fund and under reading materials, LSAs,  
2 40%  -40% the umbrella of the District's and training opportunities.  
reader reader Reading program "Project  
 
Independent 20% non-
BEEP"
 
0 0%  -0%       
Reader reader    
Pre-test (MTB-
               
MLE) Grade 3
0% non-
Non-reader 0 0%  0% Financial support  
reader of LGU to reading
 - Guided and Mentored Programs of the
Frustration 0% non- 33.33 school heads in crafting and schools through
2 33.33 implementing their reading LCPC Fund and  
reader reader % support of
% avenue
programs; and provided
for schools to gain ACCORD to the
Time Constraints
and limited or
 - financial support from "Brigada
restricted face-to-
Instructional 0% non- 33.33 LGU to their reading Pagbasa" of the 3
 
2 33.33 program under LCPC fund schools through face interaction  
reader reader % provision of
% andtheunder the umbrella of
District's Reading reading materials,
 - program "Project BEEP" opportunities.
LSAs, and training
Independent 0% non- 33.33
2 33.33    
Reader reader %
%
 (Did not meet
Expectation) 0    
70-74
(Fairly
65.22%
Satisfactory) 0 65.22% -65.22%
decrease
75-79
Monitored schools Implementation of of
(Satisfactory) 65.22 30.43% Individual Learning
30.43% -30.43% and advised to Monitoring Plan to
80-84 % increase closely monitor learners who lag the
and evaluate subject area.
none none
(Very Satisfactory) 19.57 8.71%
8.71% -8.71% assessment results Implementation of
85-89 % increase for appropriate EASE Program.
Conducted LAC
intervention to be Session to facilitate
conducted the issue.

(Outstanding) 6.52 2.17%

2.17% -2.17%
89-100 % increase
 ENGLISH                
(Did not meet School Monitoring and Implementation
0   0  
Expectation) 70-74 Conducted School of Individual
(Fairly Satisfactory) Head's meeting per Learning
0 % decrease 0% 0%
75-79 Month to provide TA to Monitoring Plan
(Satisfactory) schools who have to learners who
27 % increase 58.70% -%
80-84 FAILED Learners by lag the subject
(Very Satisfactory) implementing the area.
6 % increase 13.04% -% none none
85-89 Individual Learning Implementation
Monitoring Plan and of EASE
Communication of Program.
(Outstanding) Teachers' WHLP to Conducted LAC
3 % increase 6.52% -%
89-100 Parents(What, How Session to
and When to be facilitate the
Implemented) issue.
 MATHEMATICS                
(Did not meet
Expectation) 0   0  
70-74
School Monitoring and Implementation of
(Fairly Satisfactory) Conducted School Head's of Individual
0 % decrease 0% 0%
75-79 meeting per Month to Learning
provide TA to schools who Monitoring Plan to
(Satisfactory) have FAILED Learners by learners who lag
30 % increase 65.22% -%
80-84 implementing the Individual the subject area. none none
Learning Monitoring Plan Implementation of
(Very Satisfactory) and Communication of EASE Program.
9 % increase 19.57% -%
85-89 Teachers' WHLP to Conducted LAC
Parents(What, How and Session to facilitate
When to be Implemented) the issue.
(Outstanding) 3 % increase 6.52% -%
89-100
 SCIENCE                
(Did not meet School Monitoring and
Expectation) 0   0  -0 Conducted School
70-74 Head's meeting per Implementation of
Month to provide TA to Individual Learning
(Fairly schools who have Monitoring Plan to
%
Satisfactory) 0
decrease
0% -0% FAILED Learners by learners who lag the
75-79 implementing the subject area.
none none
(Satisfactory) % Individual Learning Implementation of
22 47.83% -% Monitoring Plan and EASE Program.
80-84 increase
Communication of Conducted LAC
(Very Satisfactory) 6
%
13.04% -%
Teachers' WHLP to Session to facilitate
85-89 increase Parents(What, How and the issue.
When to be
(Outstanding) 3 % increase 6.52% -% Implemented)
89-100
 FILIPINO                
(Did not meet
Expectation) 0   0% -0% School Monitoring and
70-74 Conducted School Head's
Implementation of of
(Fairly meeting per Month to
Individual Learning
Satisfactory) 0 % decrease 0% -% provide TA to schools who
Monitoring Plan to
have FAILED Learners by
75-79 implementing the
learners who lag the
(Satisfactory) subject area. none none
27 % increase 58.70% -% Individual Learning
80-84 Implementation of EASE
Monitoring Plan and
Program. Conducted
(Very Communication of
LAC Session to facilitate
Satisfactory) 6 % increase 13.04% -% Teachers' WHLP to
the issue.
85-89 Parents(What, How and
(Outstanding) When to be Implemented)
3 % increase 6.52% -%
89-100
 ARAL.PAN                
(Did not meet
Expectation) 0    0%  -0% School Monitoring and
Conducted School
70-74 Head's meeting per Implementation of of
(Fairly Month to provide TA to Individual Learning
Satisfactory) 0 % decrease % -% schools who have Monitoring Plan to
75-79 FAILED Learners by learners who lag the
implementing the subject area.
(Satisfactory)8 31 % increase 67.39% -% Individual Learning Implementation of
none none

0-84 Monitoring Plan and EASE Program.

(Very Communication of Conducted LAC
Teachers' WHLP to Session to facilitate
Satisfactory) 8 % increase 17.39% -%
Parents(What, How the issue.
85-89 and When to be
(Outstanding) 2 % increase 6.52% -%
Implemented)
89-100
 MAPEH                
(Did not meet
Expectation) 0   0% -0% School Monitoring and Implementation
Conducted School of of Individual
70-74 Head's meeting per Learning
(Fairly Month to provide TA Monitoring
%
Satisfactory) 0
decrease
0% -% to schools who have Plan to learners
75-79 FAILED Learners by who lag the
implementing the subject area.
(Satisfactory) % Individual Learning Implementation
none none
30 65.22% -%
80-84 increase Monitoring Plan and of EASE
(Very Communication of Program.
% Teachers' WHLP to Conducted
Satisfactory) 9
increase
19.57% -% Parents(What, How LAC Session to
85-89 and When to be facilitate the
(Outstanding) Implemented) issue.
3 % increase 6.52% -%
89-100
 EPP/TLE                
(Did not meet
Expectation) 70- 0   0% -0%
School Monitoring and
74 Conducted School Head's
(Fairly Implementation of of
meeting per Month to
Individual Learning
Satisfactory) 0 % decrease 0% -0% provide TA to schools
Monitoring Plan to
who have FAILED
75-79 Learners by
learners who lag the
subject area.
(Satisfactory) implementing the
Implementation of
none none
19 % increase 41.30% -% Individual Learning
80-84 Monitoring Plan and
EASE Program.
Conducted LAC
(Very Communication of
Session to facilitate
Teachers' WHLP to
Satisfactory) 5 % increase 10.87% -% Parents(What, How and
the issue.
85-89 When to be Implemented)
(Outstanding)
1 % increase 2.17% -%
89-100
 ESP                
(Did not meet
Expectation) 0   0% -0% School Monitoring and
Conducted School
70-74 Head's meeting per Implementation of of
(Fairly Month to provide TA to Individual Learning
Satisfactory) 0 % decrease 0% -0% schools who have Monitoring Plan to
75-79 FAILED Learners by learners who lag the
implementing the subject area.
(Satisfactory)8 Individual Learning Implementation of
none none
29 % increase 63.04% -%
0-84 Monitoring Plan and EASE Program.
(Very Communication of Conducted LAC
Teachers' WHLP to Session to facilitate the
Satisfactory) 10 % increase 21.74% -% Parents(What, How issue.
85-89 and When to be
(Outstanding) Implemented)
3 % increase 6.52% -%
89-100
 ESP                
(Did not meet
Expectation) 0   0% -0% School Monitoring and
Conducted School
70-74 Head's meeting per Implementation of of
(Fairly Month to provide TA to Individual Learning
Satisfactory) 0 % decrease 0% -0% schools who have Monitoring Plan to
75-79 FAILED Learners by learners who lag the
implementing the subject area.
(Satisfactory)8 Individual Learning Implementation of
none none
11 % increase 23.91% -%
0-84 Monitoring Plan and EASE Program.
(Very Communication of Conducted LAC
Teachers' WHLP to Session to facilitate the
Satisfactory) 4 % increase 8.70% -% Parents(What, How issue.
85-89 and When to be
(Outstanding) Implemented)
2 % increase 4.35% -%
89-100
 5%
Kindergarten 4 4 0
increase Strong
participation,
coordination
Division Face to Face Provision of
and support Lack of
and virtual orientation additional
from the School
for the progressive classrooms
5% expansion of the
parents and classrooms and other
Elementary 42 increase 42 0 stakeholders for and other ancillary
limited FACE TO
the school FACILITIES facilities
FACE Classes
participation of
the limited face
to face classes
 encouraged
NUMBER OF personnel through provision of religious
100% series of incentives to beliefs and
VACCINATED 5 5 0 orientations and  

vaccinated fully misinformatio

PERSONNEL information vaccinated n
campaign

               
 100% of the
Classrooms 4 schools will be 4 0
allocated

50% of the
Comfort rooms 4 schools will be 4 0
allocated
100% of the
Arm chairs 47 schools will be 47 0
allocated facilitated access and
On process of
participation to virtual
100% of the encoding and none none
Mono block orientation on School
0 schools will be 0 0 validation
chairs NSBI
allocated

100% of the
Learners' table
0 schools will be 0 0
and chairs allocated

100% of the
Teachers' table
6 schools will be 6 0
and chairs allocated
 100% of the
Functional
library 0 schools will 0 0
be allocated
100% of the
Science
Laboratory 0 schools will be 0 0 Virtual On process of
allocated orientation on encoding and none none
100% of the School NSBI validation
TLE
Laboratory 0 schools will be 0 0
allocated
100% of the
ICT Laboratory 0 schools will be 0 0
allocated
 KINDER &                
ELEMENTARY
FILIPINO 30 2008 47 -17
ENGLISH 61 2008 47 14
MATHEMATIC Procurement of
49 2008 47 2 Provision
Printing
S Division Virtual
Equipment.
of
meeting on the Additional
SCIENCE 28 2008 47 -19
Inventory of Learner's
Facilitate the Lack of Funds
Textbooks
ARAL. PAN. 46 2008 47 1 printing of
Materials for
SLM/LAS from
T.L.E. 15 2008 47 -31 Learners
the SDO Link
MAPEH 34 2008 47 -13
EsP 15 2008 47 -31
 ELEMENTARY
 100% Utilization for the Revision of Plan for
previous quarter some
  none
projects/programs to be
0% utilization for 2023 included in the Plan
budget
  
 
 
Lack of
School Head's
0%   professional
ELEM.  0 0 0  Meeting for
increase - training on
Innovation and -
Innovations.
Best Practices
Lack of funds
 Mentored and
Strong participation,
Guided Schools to
coordination and Lack of Provision of
Division Face to Face
Pahina for the support from parents School additional
and virtual
LIMITED and stakeholders for classrooms classrooms
40 100% 100% orientation for the
F2F Classes the school and other and other
progressive ancillary
preparation participation of the FACILITIE
expansion of the facilities
limited face to face S
limited FACE TO
classes
FACE Classes

Guided by the Barangay Bandilyo,

Early 41.30
19 100% division posting of tarpaulins,    
Registration %
memorandum and flyers
  
facilitated opportunities to time constraints of
teachers for professional availability of teachers in
development though DepEd and balancing work and
ELEM. 1  1 1  1  trainings and crafting of NEAP learning additional time for  
SLAC based from their opportunities professional
individual professional for teachers development
needs activities
 time  
constraints of
facilitated opportunities availability of
school heads in
to school heads for DepEd and
balancing
100% professional NEAP
work and
development though learning and
ELEM. 1 participation 25% 25% trainings and crafting of leadership additional time  
rate for
SLAC based from their opportunities
professional
individual professional for School
development
needs Heads
activities
  
unprecedented
activities that
Conducted Mentoring presence of
would hamper
and Coaching to seasoned and
the conduct of IS
School heads especially experienced
100% activities
ELEM. ____  ____%  0 to neophyte school school heads to unprecedented
conducted IS heads in conducting help in
 
activities that
Instructional mentoring other
would hamper
supervision school heads
the conduct of IS
activities
 Orientation
conducted by SDO
facilitated in crafting of
opportunities to SLACs, and the
teachers for conduct of
unfavorable
clustering in
0% professional
SLACs so teachers
weather disrupting
 
ELEM.  5 0%  0 development the conduct of
conducted from other school
though crafting of will be grouped clustered SLACs
 

SLAC based from with other teachers and other activities

their individual to have more
professional needs learning
interactions and
gains
 Issues and Concerns Recommendations
⮚ Some of the answered modules were not ∙ Home Visitation, Follow Up
the pupils’ handwritten. And some students ∙ Strengthened Teacher and Parents
were not actually answering the module partnership
∙ Apply for a limited face to face classes
⮚ Not appropriate Learning Environment ∙ Encourage the parents to create a study
(Congested Home Setting) area in their home where their children
⮚ Prone on playing ground could concentrate on studying and
conducting experiment, and away to
tempted to playing.
∙ Apply for a Limited Face to face Classes
⮚ Late in submitting answer sheets, ∙ Home Visitation
summative test and performance task ∙ Follow Up
∙ Apply for a Limited Face to Face
Classes
 
⮚ For kindergarten, most of the pupils
could not recognize alphabet letters, don’t
know how to trace, write lines, curves or
circles
∙ Provide materials that can help them
learn to recognize alphabet, to trace
lines, curves or circles.
∙ Strengthened Monitoring of
performance to struggled learners.
∙ Apply for a limited face to face classes

⮚ Poor academic performance due to ∙ Home visitation

difficulty in facilitating learning ∙ Monitor Performance to struggling
learners
∙ Apply for a limited face to face classes

⮚ Lack of Interest in answering the module ∙ Home Visitation

because pupils cannot understand the ∙ Follow Up / Giving Encouragement
topic. ∙ Apply for a limited face to face classes
MOVs Face-to-face

KINDER
MOVs Face-to-face

GRADE 1 AND 2
MOVs Face-to-face

GRADE 3 AND 4
GRADE 5 AND 6
MOVs of ELLN
STAKEHOLDERS MEETING
PAHINA/PREPARATION OF FACE TO FACE
CLASSES