Professional Documents
Culture Documents
INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS
SEMESTER-4
UNIT 2: INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES
Topics:
Industrialdisputes - Causes
Handling and settling disputes
Employee grievances
Steps in grievance handling
Causes for poor industrial relations
Remedies for poor industrial relations
definition
Industrial Dispute [Sec. 2(k)]: means any
dispute or difference between employers
and employers, or between employers and
workmen, or between workmen and
workmen, which is connected with the
employment or non-employment or the
terms of employment or with the
conditions of labour, of any person
Industrial Disputes have adverse effects on industrial
production, efficiency, costs, quality, human
satisfaction, discipline, technological and economic
progress and finally on the welfare of the society.
The objective of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947 is
to secure industrial peace and harmony by providing
machinery and procedure for the investigation and
settlement of industrial disputes by negotiations.
This act deals with the retrenchment process of the
employees, procedure for layoff, procedure and rules
for strikes and lockouts of the company.
In narrow sense industrial dispute means
conflict between parties in industrial
establishments.
Industrial dispute is a dispute or
difference –
(i) Between employers and employers, or
(ii) Between employers and workmen or
(iii) Between workmen and workmen.
Industrial dispute is connected with –
(i) Employment or
(ii) Non-employment or
(iii) Terms of employment or
(iv) Conditions of labour of any person.
Types of Industrial Disputes
Collective Bargaining
Grievance Redressal
Arbitration
Conciliation
Adjudication
Collective Bargaining
Collective bargaining is the most effective method of resolving industrial disputes. It occurs basically through
Works Committee i.e. when representatives of both workmen and employer meet to settle the differences which
may be due to disputes in wages, benefits, work rules, etc. Since both parties have their representatives, they can
collectively bargain to protect their interests and reach a settlement.
Grievance Redressal Mechanism
A grievance may be defined as a sort of dissatisfaction to workman with any aspect of the organisation wherein
he is employed. The same needs to be redressed for the betterment of the industry. The Industrial Disputes
(Amendment) Act, 2010 has substituted a new chapter i.e. Chapter II-B in the Act with the purpose to establish an
effective tool to resolve industrial disputes. The title of the Chapter is Grievance Redressal Machinery. Section 9C
of the Act provides for the establishment of Grievance Redressal Machinery.
Every industrial establishment having twenty or more workmen shall have one or more Grievance Redressal
Committee for the resolution of disputes arising out of individual grievances
The Grievance Redressal Committee shall consist of equal number of members from the employer and the
workmen
the workmen alternatively on rotation basis every year
The total number of members of the Grievance Redressal Committee shall not
exceed six
There shall be one woman member in the Grievance Redressal Committee in
case of two members. In case the number of members are more than two, the
number of women members may be increased proportionately
The Grievance Redressal Committee shall not affect the right of the workman to
raise industrial dispute on the same matter under the provisions of this Act
The Grievance Redressal Committee may complete its proceedings within thirty
days on receipt of a written application by or on behalf of the aggrieved party
The workman who is aggrieved by the decision of the Grievance Redressal
Committee may appeal to the employer against theThe chairperson of the
Grievance Redressal Committee shall be selected from the employer and from
among decision of the Grievance Redressal Committee and the employer shall,
within one month from the date of receipt of such appeal, dispose off the same
and send a copy of his decision to the workman concerned
Arbitration is a method of settlement of a dispute wherein a neutral third party (appointed by
both parties) apprehends the bargaining situation after listening to both the parties and studying
other information. An award is made on such settlement that binds the parties. Arbitration is
effective as a means of resolving disputes because it is relatively expeditious as compared to
court.
When can the parties refer an industrial dispute to arbitration?
Section 10A of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 provides for Voluntary reference of disputes to
arbitration. It says:
Where any industrial dispute exists or is apprehended and the employer and the workman agree
to refer the dispute to arbitration, they may, at any time before the dispute has been referred
under section 10 to a Labour Court or Tribunal or National Tribunal by a written agreement,
refer the dispute to arbitration and the reference shall be to such person or persons (including the
presiding officer of a Labour Court or Tribunal, or National Tribunal) as an arbitrator or
arbitrators as may be specified in the arbitration agreement
If arbitration agreement provides for a reference of the dispute
to an even number of arbitrators then agreement shall provide
for the appointment of another person as umpire who shall enter
upon the reference, if the arbitrators are equally divided in their
opinion, and the award of the umpire shall prevail and shall be
deemed to be the arbitration award for the purposes of this Act.
An arbitration agreement must be signed by the parties thereto
in such manner as may be prescribed
A copy of the arbitration agreement shall be forwarded to the
appropriate government and the conciliation officer
The arbitrator or arbitrators shall investigate the dispute and
submit to the appropriate government the arbitration award
signed by the arbitrator or all the arbitrators, as the case may be
Conciliation
Conciliation is a process to resolve the dispute where representatives
of workers and employers are brought together before a third party
(conciliation officer) with a view to convince them to arrive at mutual
settlement. The conciliation officer basically acts as a catalyst who
deals with parties separately and collectively in order to provide an
effective solution to the dispute. The appropriate government may
appoint one or more conciliation officer, charged with the duty of
mediating in and promoting the settlement of industrial disputes.
Section 12 of the Act provides the duties of conciliation officer
wherein the conciliation officer is required to hold conciliation
proceedings in case of any industrial dispute or where the dispute
relates to a public utility service and a notice under section 22. Other
duties include investigation of disputes, appropriate steps to settle the
dispute, submission of reports to appropriate government, etc.
.
Similarly, a board of conciliation (constituted under Section 5 of the Act) may
also be referred for settlement of the dispute. The Board of Conciliation is
another authority recognized under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to promote the
settlement of industrial disputes. Duties of Board are similar to the duties of
conciliation officer like to take necessary steps for settlement of the dispute,
submission of reports and memorandum of settlement to appropriate
Government within 2 months. In case of no settlement, the Board must submit
the full report of steps taken by it while working for the settlement. The report
shall be in writing and signed by all the members of the Board.
Adjudication
Industrial disputes can be resolved by way of adjudication i.e. settlement of an
industrial dispute by labour court or industrial tribunal. The appropriate
government may refer a dispute to adjudication depending on the failure of
conciliation proceedings. Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947,
provides for reference of a dispute to the court of inquiry or labour court or
industrial tribunal. The decision of a court of inquiry or labour court or tribunals
is binding on both the parties. The Act also provides for rules regarding the
composition and powers of the court of inquiry, labour courts and tribunals
causes of poor industrial relations
Major causes of poor industrial relations are as follows: 1. Economic Causes 2. Organisational Causes 3.
Social Causes 4. Psychological Causes 5. Political Causes.
Uninteresting Nature of Work: The problem of poor industrial relations is Essentially a product of large-
scale production which has made man subordinate to the machine. Owing to extensive specialization, work
in a factory performance only a minor operation in the whole process of production.
Political Nature of Unions: Political nature of trade unions, multiple unions and inter-union rivalry
weaken the trade union movement. In the absence of strong and responsible trade unions, collective
bargaining becomes ineffective. The union’s status is reduced to a mere strike committee.
Poor Wages: Poor wages and poor working conditions are the main reasons for unhealthy relations among
management and labour. Unauthorized deductions from wages, lack of fringe benefits, absence of
promotional opportunities, dissatisfaction with job evaluation and performance appraisal methods, faulty
incentive schemes are other economic causes.
Occupational Instability: Occupational stability makes workers feel secure in their jobs. It produces an
enervating effect on them. Workers who have held a job for several years generally win confidence in that
job and do not like any change.
Poor Organizational Climate: Organisational climate essentially emphasises the work environment. It
consists of a set of characteristics that describe an organisation, distinguish it from other organisations, are
relatively enduring over time, and influence the behaviour of people in it. Organisational climate affects
organisational processes and behaviour in more than one way.
Psychological Causes: Lack of job security, poor organisational culture, non-recognition of merit and
performance, authoritative administration and poor interpersonal relations are the psychological reasons for
unsatisfactory employer-employee relations.
REMEDIES FOR POOR INDUSTRIAL
RELATION
Sound Human Resource Policies:
Policies and procedures concerning the compensation, transfer, promotion, etc. of employees should be fair
and transparent. All policies and rules relating to employer-employee relations should be clear to everybody
in the enterprise and to the union leaders.
Top management must support them and set an example for other managers. Practices and procedures
should be developed to put human resource policies into practice. Sound policies and rules are of little help
unless they are executed objectively and equitably.
2. Constructive Attitudes:
Both management and trade unions should adopt positive attitudes towards each other. Management must
recognise union as the spokesmen of workers grievances and as custodians of their interests. The employer
should accept workers as equal partners in a joint endeavor. Unions and workers, on their part, must
recognise and accept the rights of employers.
3. Collective Bargaining:
Employers’ organisations as well as trade unions should be able and willing to deal with mutual problems
freely and responsibly. Both should accept collective bargaining as the cornerstone of good employer-
employee relations.
A genuine desire on the part of employers to bargain with employees on the basis of equality is necessary.
Government agencies should assist the two sides in public interest. Problem centred negotiations rather
than a legalistic approach is desired. Widespread union management consultations and information sharing
are helpful.
. Participative Management:
Employers should associate workers and unions in the formulation and implementation of human resource
policies and practices. Management should convince workers of the integrity and sincerity of the company.
Management should not interfere in the internal affairs of the unions. Instead of trying to win workers’
loyalty away from unions, management should encourage right type of union leadership. A strong union is
an asset to the employer.
5. Responsible Unions:
Unions should adopt a responsible rather than political approach to employer-employee relations. Unions
should accept private ownership and operations of industry. They must recognise that the welfare of
workers depends on the successful operation of industry. A strong, democratic and responsible union alone
can ensure that workers honour the agreement with their employer.
6. Employee Welfare:
Employers should recognise the need for the welfare of workers. They must ensure reasonable wages,
satisfactory working conditions, opportunities for training and development, and other necessary facilities
for labour. A genuine concern for the welfare and betterment of working class is necessary.
7. Grievance Procedure:
A well-established and properly administered system for the timely and satisfactory redressal of employees’
grievances can be very helpful in improving employer-employee relations. It provides an outlet for tensions
and frustrations of workers. Similarly, a suggestions scheme will help to satisfy the creative urge of
workers. A code of discipline if properly adhered to by both the parties will help to avoid unilateral and
violent actions on either side.