Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ADDIONAL INFO .
2017
Project analysis slide 2 2018 TYPICAL RATIOS FOR THIS
KIND OF QUESTION
GROSS MARGIN 40% 43% CURRENT RATIO 1:3
LIQUID RATIO 0:8
PROFIT MARGIN 8% 7%
gross profit
Profit current ratio Trade
divided by
margin Rate of inv Current ratio in receivable turn
the revenue relation to current
Profit turnover over
of the liabilities
divided Cost of sales Days taken to
business. or. . by . Liquid ratio
revenue divided by Liquid asset ratio receive a
gross profit
Profit in avg liquid asset in payment
in relation to relation to the
relation to inventory Trade payable
the revenue current liabilities
the revenue Liquid assets + turnover
assets-invi Days taken to
pay
Constant increase in gross margin over the years
Effect?
• Gross margin has increased by 3% b/w 2017 and 2018
Reasons
• This indicates that the business is making more revenue than last year .
• This change could be because of a decrease in the cost of sales which increases the gross
profit .
• Thus the business is doing good when it comes to the gross profit margin
A decrease in profit margin
Effect?
• However the profit margin for the business have fallen from 8% in 2017 to 7% in 2018
Reasons to be excluded
• This problem is not related to the cost of sales as the gross profit margin has increased.
Reasons
• This could be because of workers not being motivated and not working productively which might have increased
inefficiency and wastage increasing other costs of the business
Solution
• In order to maintain the profit the business should try to cut down on their expenses a way to do this is by hiring
skilled workers to increase efficiency
A decrease in return on capital employed
Effect ?
Increase from 9 to 10
Reasons
• An increase in inventory turnover means that the sales of the business have
increased which is good this will have a positive
• However they might have increased due to a decrease In average inventory
Decrease in liquidity ratio Increase in current ratio
Reason
• The reason behind this maybe that the suppliers are not loyal enough and want us to pay earlier
• And the increase in receivable may be because the business is trying to create more loyal
customers
Project analysis slideOverall
8 performance
Project analysis
The following ratios have been prepared slide 8 ratios for two similar business for the year ended 30 September 2018
to show comparative
Project analysis
Garford 33%
slide 8
vs Hobson 31%
Although both of there gp margins are good garford has a higher percentage of It .
• Over here now hobson has a greater inventory turn over than garford
but there gp is still low
• This means that there problem mainly lies with the price of there
product
• The owner is probably not aware of the PED of its products and has set
a very low prices which helps him increase demand but the prices don’t
add up to form a higher gross profit
• On the other hand garford has lower inventory turnover but still has
higher revenue
• A reason could be that the proportions of there average inventory may
be bigger than that of hobsons
• Another possibility is that the piece of there product is price inelastic
that even if there selling products at a higher price customers still buy it
Profit margin
Project Garford
analysis9% slide 8 vs Hobson 11%
EFFECT
Hobsons profit percentage is higher than garfords this could mean that hobsons
expenses are more controlled than garfords
REASON
Garfords profit % is low because of inefficient work leading to wastage and higher
inefficiency
SOLUTION
In order to correct this they need to lower there expenses and increase efficiency
Return on capital employed
Project analysis
Garford 14% slide 8 vs Hobson 12%
• Garfords roce is higher but this does not mean that there profit is higher as roce could be
higher just because of low capital invested
• However hobsons is lower this means that the business is not using its resources
effectively
• In order to increase ROCE
• The business can decrease the amount of capital employed or can try to increase revenue
*usual cr for this type
of business 1:2* Current ratio
Project analysis slide 8
Garford 1:4 vs Hobson 1,1
• However these ratios may not be useful when comparing business's that were opened with a lot
of time gap
• E.g. if one business was set up in 1990 the prices of land and resources were relatively cheaper
however a business which sets up in the current year may find it more expensive