Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Microeconomics 2
Overview
Profit maximisation in
(perfectly) competitive markets (CH8)
Microeconomics 3
Recapitulation
Perfect competition
Assumptions
market atomism price takers
homogeneous products / substitutes
(e.g. commodities)
free entry and exit
perfect information
Profit maximization
P = MR = AR
so that MR = MC P = MC
Microeconomics 5
Profit maximization in the short run
Microeconomics 6
Choosing output in the long run
Microeconomics 7
Profit maximization
Microeconomics 8
Topic introduction
Microeconomics 9
Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) of the European Union
Source: Matthews A. et al. (2017). Trade impacts of agricultural support in the EU. IATRC commissioned paper 19.
Source: Elijah A. et al. (2017). Australia, the European Union and the New Trade Agenda. ANU press.
Microeconomics 10
Protectionism
Source: https://www.intellinews.com/eu-announces-fourth-wave-of-russian-sanctions-238153/?source=russia
Microeconomics 11
Problem statement and
learning goals
Problem statement
Microeconomics 13
Learning goals
After this chapter you can
Microeconomics 14
Economic efficiency
Economic efficiency
Perfectly competitive markets (without government
intervention) are economically efficient
Welfare is maximized
W = CS + PS
Microeconomics 16
Climate change and the cost of carbon
Microeconomics 17
Let us reflect on “profit maximization”
Source: https://de.freepik.com/vektoren/menschen
Microeconomics 18
Putting profit maximization into perspective
Sustainability
“Sustainable development is development that meets the
needs of the present without compromising the ability of
future generations to meet their own needs.”
WCED (1987) “Our Common Future”
Source: https://sustain.wisconsin.edu/sustainability/triple-bottom-line/
Source: Stockholm Resilience Centre (2016), Contributions to Agenda 2030 – How Stockholm Resilience Centre (SRC) contributed to the 2016 Swedish Agenda 2030 HLPF report,
https://www.stockholmresilience.org/SDG2016
Microeconomics 19
Putting profit maximization into perspective
Legal embeddedness and ethics
Source: https://www.aa.com.tr/en/africa/one-fifth-of-african-children-are-laborers/1873615
Source: https://www.spiegel.de/international/tomorrow/child-labor-in-bolivia-is-legally-permissable-a-1130131.html
Source: https://globalmarch.org/combating-child-labor-in-global-supply-chains/
Microeconomics 20
How can we measure the effect of government
interventions?
Government interventions
Microeconomics 22
Deadweight loss
Remember: Perfectly competitive markets (without
government intervention) are economically
efficient, i.e. welfare is maximized
Microeconomics 23
Consumer and producer surplus
Consumer
surplus
P
Producer
surplus
Q Q
Microeconomics 24
How can we measure welfare?
General methodology
to calculate welfare change
Consumer
surplus
Producer
surplus
Government
(income or expenses)
Welfare
Examples:
UN’s Convention on the Rights of the Child
Belgian law on the removal and transplantation of
organs (see also example 9.2 p. 333-335)
Microeconomics 27
Welfare effect of a price ceiling (maximum price)
Price
∆ CS = +A-B
B
∆ PS = -A-C
P0
A C
∆ W = -B-C
Pmax welfare loss
(DWL)
EXCESS DEMAND
D
Qs Q0 Qd
Quantity
Microeconomics 28
Welfare effect of a sales ban (~ maximum price)
Price S’
∆ CS= +A-B
∆PS: -A-C
B
∆W = -B-C
C
Here, a maximum
A price of 0 EUR is
justified for ethical
D reasons
0 Quantity
Microeconomics 29
Consequences of price ceilings and/or sales bans
When a maximum price is imposed
it results in a deadweight loss
there is excess demand
causing very long waiting lists
and potentially black markets (cf. illegal trade of drugs)
(compare pmax with the willingness to pay)
Microeconomics 30
Welfare effect of a price ceiling (maximum price)
D
Price
Q1 Q2 Quantity
Microeconomics 31
Welfare effect of a price ceiling (maximum price)
D
Price
Q1 Q2 Quantity
Microeconomics 32
Price floor (minimum price)
Welfare effect price floor (minimum price)
Why do governments impose minimum prices?
P
Pmin
P0
Q0 Q
Qd Qs
A minimum price is imposed to protect producers and only makes sense
when it is above competitive equilibrium price.
Microeconomics 34
Welfare effect price floor (minimum price)
Suppose producers limit their production to Qd
Pmin
A B ∆ CS = -A-B
P0
∆ PS = +A-C
C
∆ W = -B-C
DWL
Qd=Qs Q0 Q
Microeconomics 35
Welfare effect price floor (minimum price)
Suppose producers do not limit production to Qd
Pmin
A B ∆ CS = -A-B
P0
∆ PS = +A-C-D
C
∆ W = -B-C-D
DWL
D
EXCESS SUPPLY V
Q0 Q
Qd Qs
Microeconomics 36
Welfare effect price floor on labour markets
wmin
A
B
w0 ∆ EMPLOYERS = -A-B
C
∆ EMPLOYEES = +A-C
∆ W = -B-C
UNEMPLOYMENT
D
Ld L0 Ls L
Microeconomics 37
Price supports and production quota
Price support
In order to guarantee higher prices (Ps) (e.g. for farmers)
government buys excess production (Qg)
(which will be financed by taxpayers)
P S ∆ CS = -A-B
Qg
∆ PS = +A+B+D
Ps ∆ G = -(Qs-Qd)Ps
D = -B-D-E
A
B
P0 ∆ W = -B-E
D + Qg
E
D
Qd Q0 Qs Q
Microeconomics 39
Production quota
In order to guarantee higher prices (Ps) (e.g. for farmers)
government limits production to S’
P S’ : production quotum
PS
A
B ∆ CS = -A-B
P0
C
∆ PS = +A-C
∆ W = -B-C
Qd=Qs Q0 Q
Microeconomics 40
Production quotum with compensation
In order to guarantee higher prices (Ps) (e.g. for farmers)
government limits production to S’
but financially compensates farmers for incurred losses
P S’ production quotum
S
PS
∆ CS = -A-B
D
A
B ∆ G = -B-C-D
P0
C ∆ PS = +A-C+compensation
= +A-C+B+C+D
= +A+B+D
∆ W = -B-C
D
Qd=Qs Q0 Q
Microeconomics 41
Price support versus production quota
Change in consumer surplus is identical (= -A-B)
Change in producer surplus is identical as well (=+A+B+D)
Cost for the government
Price support : -(Q2-Q1)PS
Production quotum : -B-C-D
Most often production quota are cheaper
BUT society would be even better off if governments would
just provide direct payments to farmers (decoupling
support from production)
For consumers nothing changes (price stays the competitive P0)
Government directly pays A+B+D to producers
Microeconomics 42
Import quotas and tariffs
Quotum of zero
Free market: world market price PW = domestic price
P
Quotum of zero import excess demand
price increases to P0
S
P0
A ∆ CS = -A-B-C
B C
PW
∆ PS = +A
D ∆ W = -B-C
IMPORT
QS Q0 QD Q
Microeconomics 44
Import quotum (but no zero import)
Instead of prohibiting imports, it will be limited
(to QD’-QS’)
S
P As a consequence of the import
quotum:
• domestic P increases from Pw to P*
• domestic production increases
• domestic QD decreases
P* • import decreases
A D ∆ CS = -A-B-C-D
B C
Pw
∆ PS = +A
IMPORT
∆ W = -B-C-D
IMPORT D
QS Q’S Q’D QD Q
S
P As a consequence of the import tariff:
• domestic P increases from Pw to P*
• domestic production increases
• domestic QD decreases
• import decreases
P*
A D ∆ CS = -A-B-C-D
B C
Pw
∆ PS = +A
IMPORT
∆ G = +D
IMPORT D
∆ W = -B-C
QS Q’S Q’D QD Q
Remark: an import tariff is better for domestic welfare than an import quotum
(compare their deadweight loss) Microeconomics 46
Import tariff – exam question
S
P
P*
Pw
IMPORT
IMPORT D
QS Q’S Q’D QD Q
True or false
For the true/false questions a “gambling correction” applies, that is,
for each incorrect answer one point is subtracted. Each correct
answer gives one point and blank answers give zero points.
True False
An import tariff is worse for domestic welfare
than an import quota.
A B
An import tariff increases domestic welfare.
A B
Microeconomics 48
Taxes and subsidies
Impact specific tax
P
S’ = S + t
S
∆ W = -B-C
Q1 Q0 Q
Microeconomics 50
Impact specific subsidy
Prijs
PS ∆ CS = +A+B
C D
P0 E ∆ PS = +C+D
A
Pb B
∆ G = -A-B-C-D-E
∆ W = -E
D
Q0 Q1 Hoeveelheid
Microeconomics 51
When is government intervention needed?
Microeconomics 52
When is government intervention needed?
In the presence of market failures
market power (CH10 & 11)
externalities (CH18)
asymmetric information (CH17)
Microeconomics 53