IRAC is a formal method for analyzing legal problems that involves identifying the issue, stating the rule, analyzing the facts in light of the rule, and reaching a conclusion. It includes:
1. Identifying the key issue(s) in question.
2. Stating the legal rules and principles relevant to those issues.
3. Analyzing how the facts relate to or intersect with those rules.
4. Reaching a conclusion on how applying the rules determines the outcome of the issue(s).
CREAC is an alternative to IRAC that rearranges the elements to conclusion, rule, elaboration of the analysis, application of the rule to the facts, and conclusion. It
IRAC is a formal method for analyzing legal problems that involves identifying the issue, stating the rule, analyzing the facts in light of the rule, and reaching a conclusion. It includes:
1. Identifying the key issue(s) in question.
2. Stating the legal rules and principles relevant to those issues.
3. Analyzing how the facts relate to or intersect with those rules.
4. Reaching a conclusion on how applying the rules determines the outcome of the issue(s).
CREAC is an alternative to IRAC that rearranges the elements to conclusion, rule, elaboration of the analysis, application of the rule to the facts, and conclusion. It
IRAC is a formal method for analyzing legal problems that involves identifying the issue, stating the rule, analyzing the facts in light of the rule, and reaching a conclusion. It includes:
1. Identifying the key issue(s) in question.
2. Stating the legal rules and principles relevant to those issues.
3. Analyzing how the facts relate to or intersect with those rules.
4. Reaching a conclusion on how applying the rules determines the outcome of the issue(s).
CREAC is an alternative to IRAC that rearranges the elements to conclusion, rule, elaboration of the analysis, application of the rule to the facts, and conclusion. It
• It is the formal way of solving case problem for the lawyer.
• IRAC represents the; • I- identifying the issue • R- describing the rule • A- analyzing the fact with the rule • C-conclusion • Issue • Issue is the question which you should address. A given problem may have more than one issues. You should put the issue shortly and clearly. • You can put the issue based on the below example • The issue is whether their is marriage between the man and women? • Who should guardian o the children? • Is there any personal property? • Who is the owner of the property? • Is there a contract between the parties? • RULES • it is the discussion of the legal provisions which can define and govern the issues you already identified. these is not only writing the provision of the law and even putting the legal provision directly is not advisable(if you put the provision directly, put it in quotation) rather it is better to put the provision in your own word and you have to put the adequate significance of the provision with the problem. • Analysis of Facts • This part is discussing or explaining how the issue is going to be solved based on the provision of the law we provide under the rule. the analyze should also defend as well as undermine the another idea or analyze by providing the reason why the antagonistic or opposite idea legally unacceptable (should not acceptable) and your idea is more legal and acceptable. • Conclusion • It is to show you are going to summarize your discussion. What you should conclude is only what you already discussed and you shouldn't add new idea that you don’t discuss. • Most of the time conclusion starts with; • Therefore, • Generally, • To conclude, • As/to summarize and etc. CREAC • It is an alternative formula for IRAC. • It is to mean; • C- conclusion • R- rules • E- elaboration(more or less analyze in IRAC) • A- application( it is an application of the rule you provided in the fact) • C- conclusion( restating in other words) • CREAC is mostly used in the validity question whether the problem have legal provision or answered based on general principle.