Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Medical perspectives.
Levofloxacin
Levofloxacin
History
• The optical S-(-) isomer of ofloxacin) was developed by the Daiichi
Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. (now Daiichi Sankyo Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd - one
of Japan's largest pharmaceutical companies) in Japan.
• Was developed to ensure excellent ofloxacin's antibacterial potency and
minimize toxicity.
• First launched in Japan in 1993 under the brand name Cravit.
• Currently marketed in the U.S. by Ortho McNeil Pharmaceutical under the
name Levaquin, under license from Daiichi.
• Sanofi-Aventis sells levofloxacin under the brand Tavanic in Europe/ ME.
Levofloxacin- Background
• Dual MOA:
1. Inhibition of bacterial DNA Gyrase (Topoisomerase II)
1. Formation of quinolone-DNA-Gyrase complex
2. Induced cleavage of DNA
2. Inhibition of bacterial Topoisomerase IV
1. Mechanism poorly understood
Anaerobic bacteria
ABSORPTION
• Levofloxacin is rapidly and completely absorbed after oral
administration.
• Cmax - 5.7 + 1.4 mcg/ml.
• tmax - 1 to 2 hours
• bioavailiability - 100%
• Food prolongs tmax & decreases Cmax but the therapeutic efficacy is
not affected
Pharmacokinetics
DISTRIBUTION
• Distribution - Wide
METABOLISM
EXCRETION
• Hypersensitivity to FQs
• Epilepsy
• Tendon disorders
• Children or growing adolescents
• Pregnancy
• Lactation
Levofloxacin – Side Effects
Antacids
• Interferes with absorption of Levofloxacin lower levels are
achieved than desired.
• Antacid to be taken 2 hrs before or after Levofloxacin.
Warfarin
• Levofloxacin enhances effect of warfarin. Patient should be
closely monitored for evidence of bleeding.
Theophylline
• No drug interaction is exhibited with theophylline like older
quinolones.
Levofloxacin – Warning
• Tendon rupture
Levofloxacin – Precaution
Pregnancy
Lactation
Pediatric Use
AECB 500 mg OD 7
CAP 500 mg OD 7-14
AMS 500 mg OD 10-14
USSSI 500 mg OD 7-10
CSSSI 750 mg OD 7-14
UUTI 250 mg OD 3
CUTI 250 mg OD 10
Acute pyelonephritis 250 mg OD 7-14
Levofloxacin –
Dosage: Patients with impaired Renal function
Renal Status Initial Dose Subsequent Dosing
CSSSI
CLCR from 50 to 80 ml / min No dosage adjustment
UUTI
No dosage adjustment is necessary
CUTI/ Acute Pyelonephritis
CLCR more than 20 ml / min No dosage adjustment
Comparative Studies
Levofloxacin – UTI: vs Lomefloxacin
Levofloxacin Lomefloxacin
Regimen 250 mg OD X 7-10 days 400 mg OD X 14 days
Bacterial eradication rate 95.5%(168/176) 91.7% (154/ 68)
Complete resolution of symptoms at the 5 to 84.8% 82.4%
9-day post-therapy
Decreased symptoms 8.2% 6.1%
Clinical success rate 93% 88.5%
Adverse events 10 patients (2.6%) 18 patients (5.2%)
Discontinuation because of adverse events 8 patients (3.4%) 14 patients (6.1%)
observed in 8 (3.4%) levofloxacin- and 14
(6.1%) lomefloxacin-treated patients.
Levofloxacin – UTI: vs Lomefloxacin
Levofloxacin Lomefloxacin
Adverse events 2% 5%
Levofloxacin – AECB: vs Cefaclor
AECB
Levofloxacin v/s cefaclor
• Prospective multicentric, randomized study involving 373
adults.
• Levofloxacin was more effective than oral cefaclor.
• Bacteriological eradication - levofloxacin 94%
cefaclor 81%
Levofloxacin – AECB: : vs Cefuroxime
AECB
• Levofloxacin - (500mg/day)
CAP
Levofloxacin v/s ceftriaxone/cefuroxime axetil
• Randomized study involving 456 patients.
• Levofloxacin 500mg as 1-hour infusion or orally for 7 to 14
days parentral ceftriaxone or oral cefuroxime axetil 500mg
twice daily orally for 7 to 14 days.
• Levofloxacin has shown higher clinical success rates as
compared with these cephalosporins.
Levofloxacin –vs Ceftriaxone/ Cefuroxime
CAP…
CAP
• Levofloxacin treatment resulted in approximately a 97%
clinical success rates, while ceftriaxone or cefuroxime axetil
therapy achieved a 90% success rate.
• The microbiological eradicated rates for pneumonia patients
infected with Haemophilus influenzae, Streptococcus
pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, Moroxella catarrhalis,
Haemophilis parainfluenzae and Klebsiella pneumoniae are
98%, 95%, 88%, 94% and 100% respectively.
Levofloxacin –SSSI: vs Ciprofloxacin
SSSI’s
Bacterial sinusitis
Levofloxacin v/s cefuroxime axetil
• Clinical studies have demonstrated that oral levofloxacin is
about as effective as cefuroxime axetil for treating acute
bacterial sinusitis.
• For treatment of acute maxillary sinusitis, levofloxacin is
recommended for infections cause by Streptococcus
pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenza or Moraxella catarrhalis.
Levofloxacin –ABS: vs Co-amoxiclav
Bacterial sinusitis
Levofloxacin v/s amoxycillin/clavulanic acid
Bacterial sinusitis
Levofloxacin v/s clarithromycin
• In a open comparative study of oral levofloxacin 500mg
with clarithromycin 500mg bid clinical success rates were
found out to be 96% with levofloxacin and 93.3% with
clarithromycin.
Levofloxacin –UTI: vs Ciprofloxacin
ADVAQUIN Vs Ciprofloxacin
a) More active against all types of Strep pneumoniae - 1st line in CAP.
b) Has better activity against B. fragilis, the commonest anaerobe.
c) Similar activity compared to Ciprofloxacin against atypicals & Legionella.
d) Does not interact with theophylline and hence safe in asthmatics on
theophylline while ciprofloxacin interacts altering plasma levels of
theophylline.
e) Less phototoxic than ciprofloxacin
f) Shows comparable efficacy in umcomplicated SSTI & complicated UTI.
g) Has convenient OD dosage (Vs bid of ciprofloxacin).
ADVAQUIN advantages over other antimicrobial agents
a) Has better activity against all types of S. pneumoniae (A/CA does not
cover - penicillin-intermediate & - resistant strains)
b) Has excellent activity against atypicals & Legionella (A/CA - not active).
Excellent success in
resistant typhoid 5 days therapy in URTI
Rx the best…
ADVAQUIN