Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Project framed within the internal fund of the UCSH, and coordinated by professionals from
different disciplines (pedagogy, sociology, psychology and engineering), belonging to the Research
Center for Socio-educational Transformation (CITSE) of the Universidad Católica Silva Henríquez.
At the global level, practices that favor attention to diversity in school classrooms have gained
strength, in response to the global challenges of democratic and inclusive teaching (Ainscow, 2020;
UNESCO, 2020; Chapman and & Ainscow, 2021).
Co-teaching practices have become a joint teaching strategy that responds to the challenges of
cooperation between teachers (Chandler-Olcott & Nieroda, 2016; Friend, 2019; Scruggs &
Mastropieri , 2017).
In the Chilean context, the creation of the School Integration Programs (PIE) stands out as a
framework for school integration that modifies the public regulations that regulate school inclusion
and that they propose to work through the collaborative work of multidisciplinary teams.
In this scenario, the Covid-19 pandemic has stressed school communities in various collaborative
dimensions (Gajardo-Asbún et al, 2021; Lizana et al, 2021; Ramos-Huenteo et al, 2020; Salas et al,
2020) including co-teaching practices .
Perspectives of teachers and school directors on the development of shared pedagogical practices: development of co-teaching in Chilean public schools
Theoretical framework
Co-teaching, origin and approach
• Co-teaching originates from the concept of cooperative teaching (Beamish et al,
2006; Murawski & Swanson, 2001).
• It refers to the responsibility shared by teachers to teach a class, where they provide
help and collaborate for the needs of the students (Cramer et al, 2010; Friend, 2008).
• Both teachers collaboratively plan, teach, and assess a group of students (Beninghof,
2012; Cook & Friend, 1995; Murawski, 2008).
• It would allow co-teachers to address different instances of learning (Krüger & Yorke,
2010), which would encourage the modeling of collaborative practices in the
classroom and interdisciplinary thinking (Karahan & Roehrig, 2017).
Theoretical framework
Support conditions for co-teaching
• Due to the complexities inherent in the implementation of co-teaching , the support
of school administrators is essential to generate favorable conditions for this practice
(Friend , 2009).
• The role of principals in co-teaching echoes the concept of "leadership for learning,"
which describes managerial action in terms of five dimensions: setting objectives in
relation to learning, allocating resources strategically, ensuring quality teaching. ,
facilitate teacher learning, and ensure an orderly and safe environment (Bolívar,
2012; Robinson, 2008).
Perspectives of teachers and school directors on the development of shared pedagogical practices: development of co-teaching in Chilean public schools
Theoretical framework
Co-teaching in Chile
• Focused on joint experiences between public school teachers and the difficulties to
implement the policy that regulates collaboration between professionals in the
school communities attached to the PIE.
• First group of studies: they investigate the conceptions of teachers who co-teach.
They point out the different visions among teachers and the various profiles that
emerge from them (Arriagada et al., 2021; Inostroza; 2021; López et al., 2014; Muñoz
et al., 2015).
• Secondly, the inquiries about the forms of development of co-teaching: show a low
degree of collaboration between teachers. (Rodríguez, 2012; Figueroa-Céspedes et
al., 2020; Rosas & Palacios, 2021; Urbina et al., 2017).
• Other interesting findings from the referred studies is that they show a series of
facilitators and barriers in this practice that requires strong institutional support for
its implementation (Maldonado-Díaz, 2022).
Perspectives of teachers and school directors on the development of shared pedagogical practices: development of co-teaching in Chilean public schools
Theoretical framework
COVID-19 and co -teaching
• In Chile, the studies are incipient.
• The studies coincide in pointing out that the changes from face-to-face to online and
hybrid education models in socio-sanitary emergencies have led to three dilemmas
for co-teachers.
• First, the need to continue with instruction specially designed or appropriate for
these scenarios. Second, the constant emergence of new challenges due to COVID-19
or related public policies. Lastly, the uncertainty regarding how to implement co-
teaching in this new context (Barron et al, 2021; Chizhik & Brandon, 2020).
Methodology
Characterization of establishments
Variable Category % establishments % participants
Territory North Zone 50% 25%
Center 30% 32%
South Zone 20% 44%
rurality Urban 60% 59%
Rural 40% 41%
faculty Less than 15 teachers 20% 9%
Between 15 and 30 50% 52%
teachers
More than 30 teachers 30% 39%
Registration number Less than 100 students 15% 6%
Between 100 and 300 45% 45%
students
Between 301 and 500 25% 23%
students
More than 500 students 15% 25%
years of operation Between 10 and 39 years 20% 26%
Years in co-teaching Category
Between 40 and 69 years 5 0% % 38%
practices at the Between
less than70 and 99
5 years years
ago 1 5% 39% 22%
establishment more than5100
Between andyears
15 years fifteen% 45% 14%
more than 15 years ago 16%
Perspectives of teachers and school directors on the development of shared pedagogical practices: development of co-teaching in Chilean public schools
Results
Results
Change in the frequency of joint planning
71% of teachers 2%
Continúa igual
planning 50%
Disminuye
27% Cesa
Results
Change in the frequency of co-teaching
61% of teachers 7%
34%
Evaluation of shared teaching in both periods Change in the components of shared teaching
100%
Objetivos de aprendizaje 30%
80%
Results
evaluation of
37%
Continúa igual
learning Disminuye
Cesa
37%
Evaluation of the joint assessment of learning in both Change in the components of the joint assessment
periods of learning
100%
Aprendizajes 48%
80%
Educación Remota Educación presencial 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Perspectives of teachers and school directors on the development of shared pedagogical practices: development of co-teaching in Chilean public schools
Results
Changes in the support granted for co- Training instances for co-teaching during
teaching as a result of the pandemic the pandemic
2%
No han cambiado las condiciones para el trabajo
de pares 9%
22% Aumentaron
Aumento de los tiempos designados para el 50%
trabajo de pares Continuaron iguales
44%
Adaptación de espacios físicos o virtuales para el 72% Disminuyeron
trabajo de pares
Dejaron de realizarse
Actualización de los lineamientos para el trabajo
70% 32%
de pares
Discussion
Those who co-teach the most are teachers of The most widespread practice is the
basic and first basic cycle, language and joint evaluation of learning, followed
Discussion
mathematics, for less than 5 years and from
small and large establishments
by joint planning, and in last place is
shared teaching.
conclusions
The study makes it possible to identify different training needs in co-teaching and,
from a projective perspective, spaces to continue developing initiatives in school
communities, as well as in initial teacher training and continuous teacher training
(Bullock et al, 2002; Rosas & Palacios, 2021; Zadorozhna et al, 2020).
The research hopes to contribute to the review of the experiences lived before and
during the pandemic, in order to make visible the training needs, the proposals for
improvement and investigate the open paths in the initial and continuous training of
teachers in practices. of shared teaching in inclusive educational contexts.
Perspectives of teachers and school leaders
on the development of shared pedagogical
practices: development of co-teaching in
Chilean public schools