Professional Documents
Culture Documents
TRADITIONAL
DEVELOPMENT
PRESENTED BY:
Cherry velle v. tangog
TRADITIONAL SYSTEMS LIFE CYCLE
Preliminary Analysis
System Design
Development
Maintenance
Evaluation
Disposal
TRADITIONAL SYSTEMS LIFE CYCLE
ADVANTAGES
First and foremost, this method makes it much easier to manage the
team and its resources when working on the custom software
development project.
This approach suits projects within stable markets that are resilient
to changes and can operate within the same frameworks for years.
TRADITIONAL SYSTEMS LIFE CYCLE
DISADVANTAGES
The main disadvantage of this method is that it is rather rigid and does
not allow for any flexibility. Once the development stage is over, it is
hard to come back to it and implement any changes. That is why many
project managers seek alternative development methods not satisfied
with the waterfall method and its rigidity.
Another issue with this method is that it is rather slow. As said, you
cannot start working on a new stage of development while still working
on the previous one, even if you have enough people and resources to
do so.
PROTOTYPING
Identify basic requirements
Step 1
Yes
User satisfied?
No
ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES
Frees IS resources for higher Duplication or effort and waste of
resources
priority projects
Greatly increased costs
May help reduce the hidden backlog
Loss of control over data
Faster design/implementation cycle
Loss of control of quality in both
More acceptable to users programs and data
Incompatible prevent sharing
Reduces communications
problems between users and IS Can be used to circumvent control processes
ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES
Improved focus on core Service delivery – fall behind time
business activities
Confidentiality and Security
Increased efficiency
Lack of Flexibility
Controlled costs