Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Present Ac I On Carlos 2
Present Ac I On Carlos 2
‒ The presence of any of these probabilistic factors is not necessarily indicative of mixed states, but accumulation of
these factors should alert clinicians to the possibility of MDD with mixed features
Clinical History
Unipolar Family history of bipolar Treatment History Bipolar
disorder
Early age of onset of first Worse response to Symptoms
depressive episode (<25 years) antidepressants
# of lifetime affective episodes Antidepressant-induced Psychotic features
hypomania Atypical depressive symptoms
# of hospitalizations
Rapid onset of depressive Subsyndromal hypomanic
episodes symptoms
Greater severity of depressive Impulsivity
episodes Aggression
Hostility
Comorbid SUD
35
30 34.0% 33.8%
Percentage (%)
25
26.0%
20
15
10
0
MDD BD-I BD-II
(n=149) (n=65) (n=49
)
*Data from a post hoc analysis of participants who met criteria for a current mood episode as part of MDD (n=506) or BD (BD-I: n=216, BD-II: n=130)
Mixed features specifier (MFS) was operationalized as a score ≥1 on 3 or more select items on the Young Mania Rating Scale
(YMRS) or ≥1 on 3 select items of the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) or Hamilton Depression Rating Scale
(HAMD-17) during an index major depressive episode (MDE) or hypo/manic episode, respectively
TREAT
EASY TO TREAT (no
15 –
meds required)
ITT
10 –
ETT-1
ETT-2
5–
EASY TO TREAT (one
0– med required)
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
MDD = major
depressive Participants with medication-resistant history (difficult-to-treat group [DTT]) without any antidepressant use (easy-to-treat group 1 [ETT-
1]) or those without any change in antidepressant (easy-to-treat group 2 [ETT-2]). Participants who changed antidepressant just once,
disorder after an adequate antidepressant trial (intermediate level of difficulty to treat [ITT]).
^ * *p<0.05
* ref ^p=0.06
* * N=674
The interaction of bipolar diagnosis and childhood The interaction of bipolar diagnosis and number of
maltreatment type is associated with odds of having at childhood maltreatment histories is associated with odds
least one medical illness in adulthood of having at least one medical illness in adulthood in a
dose-dependent manner
BMI, body mass index; CVD, cardiovascular disease; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TG, triglycerides.
1. Weiner M et al. Ann Clin Psychiatry 2011;23(1):40-7.
2. de Almeida KM et al. CNS Neurosci Ther 2012;18(2):160-6.
3. International Diabetes Federation. The IDF Consensus Worldwide Definition of the Metabolic Syndrome. Brussels, Belgium: IDF Communications;
2006.
4. Kemp DE et al. Bipolar Disord 2010;12(4):404-13.
5. Cooper SJ et al. J Psychopharmacol 2016;30(8):717-48. doi: 10.1177/0269881116645254. Epub 2016.
6. ADA, APA, AACE, NAASO. Diabetes Care 2004;27(2):596-601.
7. Liu YK et al. J Affect Disord 2021;S0165-0327(21)01427-0.
RM
Prevalence of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Impaired Fasting Glucose, General
Obesity, and Abdominal Obesity in Patients With Bipolar Disorder: A Systematic
Review and Meta-Analysis
Relative risk of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus in bipolar patients and age- and gender-matched non-bipolar
populations
10
0
Non-obese BMI 30 BMI 35
• Bipolar I specifier
Bipolar Specifier
• Bipolar II specifier X
3 Medications
≥4 Medications
0 5 15 20 30 40 45 50
25 35 AMSP
10 Swedish National Registry EMBLEM Stanley-Pittsburgh
Bipolar Choice STEP-BD Institute of Living
AMSP, Institut fur Arzneimittelsicherheit in der Psychiatrie.
Freedom From Fear Butler
Kim AM et al. J Clin Psychiatry 2021;82(3):20r13263. AC
Second-Generation Antipsychotic
Drugs in Bipolar Depression
Adjunctive
Monotherapy (to Lithium or Valproate)
Lumateperone*
Quetiapine1
Olanzapine/fluoxetine2
Lurasidone3
Cariprazine4
*Lumateperone has FDA approval for the treatment of schizophrenia in adults. Safety and efficacy have not been established for other uses.
1. Quetiapine fumarate PI. 2. Olanzapine and fluoxetine PI. 3. Lurasidone hydrochloride PI. 4. Cariprazine PI.
AC
Olanzapine-Fluoxetine Combination (OFC) in Bipolar Depression
Data from two 8-week randomized clinical trials for bipolar depression. Primary measure was
change in MADRS; OFC was significantly superior to both OLZ and PBO.
OFC: n=86, mean daily dose 7.4 mg/39.3 mg. OLZ: n=370, mean daily dose 9.7 mg. PBO:
n=377.
AC
Acute Responder Efficacy of Lurasidone
in Bipolar Disorder I Depression
Adjunctive Design1 Monotherapy Design2 Mean baseline doses
100 100 of lithium in the
lurasidone and placebo
80 80 groups: 897.2 mg/day
and 947.3 mg/day,
† † respectively
Patients (%)
57
60 60 53 51
42 Mean baseline doses
40 40 of valproate in the
30
lurasidone and placebo
20 20 groups: 1058.3 mg/day
and 1117.8 mg/day,
respectively
0 0
Placebo + Li/VPA Lurasidone + Li/VPA Placebo Lurasidone Lurasidone
(N = 161) (N = 179) *P <.01 (N = 162) 20-60 mg 80-120 mg
NNT = 7 †P <.001 (N = 161) (N = 162) Li, lithium; LOCF, last observation
NNT = 5 NNT = 5 carried forward; MADRS,
Responder criteria: ≥50% reduction from baseline in MADRS at LOCF endpoint. Montgomery-Asberg Depression
Rating Scale; NNT, number needed
NNT: 1/( % responders on active compound - % responders on placebo) to treat; VPA, valproate.
-13.0
-20.5
*P <.05. †P <.01. ‡P <.001. MADRS range: 0–60. Mean daily dose of lurasidone: 36.2 mg/day. Mixed model for repeated measures, ITT population.
ITT, intention-to-treat; LS, least squares; MADRS, Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale; MDD, major depressive disorder.
-2 -2
-4 -4
-6 -6
*
-8 -8 †
*
-10 -10 ‡
‡ †
-12 * -12
-14 † -14 ‡
‡
-16 Placebo ‡ -16 Placebo ‡
Cariprazine 1.5 mg/day Cariprazine 1.5 mg/day
*P <.05
Cariprazine 3 mg/day †P <.01 Cariprazine 3 mg/day
‡P ≤.001
AIA
Non-AIA
Mean Agitation Score
HDRS-17 Score
anodal-left cathodal-right Sham tDCS
prefrontal sessions on 15
weekdays, then 1 session every
fortnight until Week 6 10
Active tDCS
5
Baseline Week 2 Week4 Week 6
Time
Response: 67.6% (vs. 30.4% sham); NNT=2.69
Up to 60% of
depressed
patients with BPII
are initially
diagnosed with
unipolar
depression
Stahl SM. Stahl's Essential Psychopharmacology, 5th ed; 2021; Hirschfeld RM et al. J Clin
Psychiatry 2003;64(2):161-74; Singh MK et al. Bipolar Disord 2021;23(8):834-7.
Factors That Contribute to Misdiagnosis
• Several of the agents that are approved for bipolar depression are also
effective for depression with mixed features
Unmet
Unmet
Need
2009 Quetiapine (Age 10–17)
RISK FOR
AIM?
Genetics
Neural Factors (CYP P450
(amygdala volume, polymorphisms)
prefrontal-limbic
connectivity,
physiology) Family History
BACKGROUND QUESTION
-Mixed features in youth with bipolar Depressive Mania Do bridge symptoms moderate the acute
depression affect treatment outcomes Symptoms Symptoms
and long-term treatment effects of
-Bridge symptoms overlapping between lurasidone in youth with bipolar
depressive and manic states may depression?
moderate treatment effects Reduced Sleep Irritability Decreased Need for Sleep
CONCLUSIONS: Successful remediation of sleep disturbance and irritability improved the effect of lurasidone on
depressive symptoms; targeting bridge symptoms like sleep disturbances may ameliorate treatment outcomes.
Singh MK et al. Curr Neuropharmacol 2022;doi: 10.2174. Online ahead of print.
Patient Centricity to Optimize Clinical Outcomes
Correll CU. Using patient-centered assessment in schizophrenia care: defining recovery and discussing concerns and preferences,
J Clin Psychiatry 2020 Apr 14;81(3):MS19053BR2C.
Lauriello J. Patient-centered psychopharmacology and psychosocial interventions: treatment selection and shared decision-making to
enhance chances for recovery, J Clin Psychiatry 2020 May 12;81(3):MS19053BR4C.