The poem compares the suburb of White City Jabavu in Soweto to a giant, oozing sore, suggesting decay and disease. This is representative of the poverty, neglect, and oppression faced by inhabitants under apartheid, leaving them demoralized and spiritually sick. Stanza 2 describes the residents as insignificant and feeling smothered, like little houses trapped in the system. Stanza 3 depicts dogs fighting over a dumped, mutilated baby corpse, possibly symbolizing the violence and disregard shown to Black lives under apartheid.
The poem compares the suburb of White City Jabavu in Soweto to a giant, oozing sore, suggesting decay and disease. This is representative of the poverty, neglect, and oppression faced by inhabitants under apartheid, leaving them demoralized and spiritually sick. Stanza 2 describes the residents as insignificant and feeling smothered, like little houses trapped in the system. Stanza 3 depicts dogs fighting over a dumped, mutilated baby corpse, possibly symbolizing the violence and disregard shown to Black lives under apartheid.
The poem compares the suburb of White City Jabavu in Soweto to a giant, oozing sore, suggesting decay and disease. This is representative of the poverty, neglect, and oppression faced by inhabitants under apartheid, leaving them demoralized and spiritually sick. Stanza 2 describes the residents as insignificant and feeling smothered, like little houses trapped in the system. Stanza 3 depicts dogs fighting over a dumped, mutilated baby corpse, possibly symbolizing the violence and disregard shown to Black lives under apartheid.
Question 1 (stanza 1) 1.1 What comparison is being made in stanza 1?
1.2 What is this figure of speech called?
1.3 What is the poet trying to tell us about life in
White City Jabavu by making this comparison? Stanza 1 The suburb in Soweto compared to a giant, oozing sore: suggestion of decay, disease. This tells us: • Firstly, the place is squalid due to poverty and neglect. • Secondly, the inhabitants are demoralised, emotionally and spiritually sick because of this poverty and neglect (by government – ultimately, this is a result of Apartheid • Thirdly, the suburb is a symbol of all of South Africa which has become a place of moral decay due to the oppression of Apartheid. Question 2 (stanza 2) 2.1 What comparison is being made in this stanza?
2.2 What is the poet trying to tell us about life in this
suburb by using this image? (Hint: consider the connotations of the words ‘smothered’, ‘little’ and ‘caught’) Question 3 (stanza 3) 3.1 What is meant by the ‘red bandanas of blood?
3.2 What do the words ‘scavenging’ and ‘fought
fiercely’ tell us about the dogs?
3.3 What else could the poet be referring to through
this description of the dogs? Question 3 (stanza 3) 3.4 What is the effect of the words ‘fangs’, ‘velvet tongues’, ‘scurried’?
3.2 What do the words/phrases ‘squirming’, ‘mutilated corpse’,
‘dumped on a rubbish heap’ tell us about the attitude that has been shown towards this baby?
3.3 Is there another layer of meaning to the description of the
baby? Stanza2 ‘little houses’ – shows vulnerability; insignificance of inhabitants within apartheid system
houses are a symbol for the people who feel ‘smothered’
and ‘trapped’ by poverty, neglect, the political system.