English Language & Literature Department Faculty of Languages & Communication Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris Why ESP?
• More learners of EFL as compared to other
language. • Many have no specific objectives in learning the language. • Then, why one studies English? • Learners study English because it is an important world language. • Learners need language as they require later in their studies or career for purposes as yet unknown. • Some study English because they have no choice! • English is a compulsory foreign language in many school and university curricula. There are some specific reasons for learning English: -English may be the medium of instruction in higher education in their countries or at least the language of their textbooks. -For professionals, it may be their working language, for example, hospital doctors all over the world. • For scientists, English may be the language of the professional journals they read to keep up to date with their specialism and for which they write if they wish to make their research known to the rest of the world. • Some of the reasons for learning English: -it is the main language of books, newspapers, airports and air-traffic control, international business and academic conferences, science, technology, medicine, diplomacy, sports, international competitions, pop music and advertising. • Over two thirds of the world’s scientists write in English. • Three-quarters of the world’s mail is written in English. • Of all the information in the world’s electronic retrieval systems, 80% is stored in English. Task 1
What do you think are the advantages of an ESP
course for the learner and for the sponsor of the course?
Note briefly your views.
Expect to spend about 20 minutes on this task. What is ESP?
What is specific about English for Specific Purposes?
-ESP is often defined by contrasting it with EGP. -Discussion of what makes ESP distinct from EGP has focused on the learners and their needs, the role of the ESP teacher, the choice of text and the design of materials, aspects of language and appropriate methodology. *Learners and their needs
What sort of needs do ESP learners have?
How and when these needs to be assessed? Who should participate in the needs assessment? How is the analysis of needs to be translated into course design? These are some of the kinds of practical and theoretical issues which arise in relation to needs analysis in ESP. *The role of the ESP teacher
How does the role of ESP teacher differ from that of
the EGP teacher? What traditional roles may she be asked to play and are there skills other than pedagogic in which the ESP teacher should be proficient? In what sense, if any, is the role of ESP teacher more demanding than of the EGP teacher? These questions relate to the status of the ESP professional as well as the training that ESP teachers require. *The choice of text and the design of materials Are ESP materials distinctively different from General English materials? This is a controversial question. ESP materials are obviously different in their choice of topic and language content, especially vocabulary. However, they may share the same principles of format, staging, and activity types. *Aspects of language Do the language needs of ESP learners differ from those on General English courses? While there is some overlap, most ESP learners need a vocabulary not normally found in General English course books and the vocabulary they need will vary according to specialism. Some ESP learners may need development of one language skill more than others. ESP learners may also need to be familiar with particular types of text, such as business letters or laboratory reports. Appropriate Methodology
Does ESP have a distinct methodology?
Although at one time ESP could claim to be more communicative in its approach than EGP on the grounds that it was based more firmly on student needs, this difference has become less salient with the adoption of communicative approaches in most teaching of EGP. There is now considerable overlap between EGP and ESP teaching in terms of classroom activities. It is in the way that ESP teaching relates to the specialism and takes into account the specialist knowledge the learner brings to the classroom that distinct differences emerge. Task 2 a) Complete Column 1 of the following note-taking frame with reference to Robinson (pp.2-5). b) In column 2 enter the characteristics of a course with which you are familiar. How far does this course match Robinson’s characteristics? c) Compare Robinson’s characteristics with those of Strevens. (See John, A. M. and Dudely-Evans, p. 298) 1. ESP Course 2. Your course Orientation Based on Duration Age of students Level of students Content of course Natura of activities What are the main branches of ESP? Task 3: 1. Study the list of abbreviations for some of the different branches of ESP. What do they mean? What other types of ESP are familiar to you? EAP, EOP, EST, EVP, EPP, EMP. 2. Can you think of ways in which ESP courses can be classified? Try to express your answer in a diagram. 3. Compare your answer with the diagrams shown in Robinson(pp. 2-5) and Hutchinson and Waters (ch 3). Expect to spend about 1 hour on this task.